Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sophron, you clearly didn't understand what I was saying, which was that I doubt you live close to the kinds of kids who grow up with alcoholic/drug addicted abusive parents, but in reality they are all our neighbours (maybe not in close proximity) and what happens to them affects all of society.


I wasn't even saying the kids mentioned in the original postings came from these kinds of backgrounds, but the references to scum, thugs, feral kids etc and the later posts saying they'd been subject to increasingly extreme behaviour made me bring up the connection between lack of money spent on preventing kids becoming damaged versus waiting till they are fucked up then banging them in jail.


El Pibe, I would prefer less government, at the top, not just at the bottom. If they are going to take our taxes, spend them on making society better, not on funding armies, militarised police forces, corporations who have been allowed to hoover up our public assets at huge discounts etc.


My idea of less government would also be less government to protect the elite from having their loot and land re-distributed.


I'm all for a bit of anarchy, but not sure I'll get many EDFers on board lol.

El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> thought this might cheer up a few who prefer a more heavy handed approach


Looks like that is far from the first punch that woman's ever thrown!

Is this Lady D. mistaking a poor drug addled teenager for one of the many yuppie millionaires of East Dulwich(despite the skateboard as she doesn't like to conflate reality with her own world view she has decided she is right)?

Sophran I believe the question of the parents were brought up by another poster, I'm not sure there would be

many millionaire kids.


Young adts/teenagers hanging around bothering people do tend to make assumptions on where your from, if they've had

a rough life they often feel resentful and assume, often wrongly, others are more

priviledged, and would never understand the problems the face them.this causes a big barrier when it comes to approaching them about unacceptable behaviour.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> 3 little piggies Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > When my two were small I found the teens

> > intimidating and unapproachable and now mine

> are

> > 13 and 14 they are part of that 'set'.

>

> Your kids also bully younger children?



Jeremy, in response to your question, no, my kids don't bully younger children.


The 'set' I am referring to are the young teens in general, which, as a parent of young children, I was naturally wary of, having never had experience of dealing with them.


Now I have no choice, these teens are my kids' peers, my kids go to school with them, travel to and from school alongside them, they come into contact with them every day, I have had to learn how to deal with them and more importantly, so have my kids.


I still find them intimidating and unapproachable but do we just 'give up'? Are they all 'gangsters in the making'? It's easy to demonise them all but harder to work out a solution. As a parent of kids of that age I am merely trying to explain (not excuse) some of their behaviour and to say childhood goes very quickly, it only seems like yesterday that mine were the little ones playing on the swings.


And just to make it clear, I'm very proud that last week on the rowing course they was on, my 13 year old daughter and 14 year old son integrated with all the teens (including the big and scary monosyllabic ones). At the beginning of the week they were the only ones speaking to the overweigh, introverted and obvious outsider in the group, encouraging his participation and making sure to include him, whilst the others were making fun. By the end of the week he was a natural part of the group and his dad came over and thanked my two, as did the course leader.


It's a shame you only chose to highlight that small part of my post and turn it into something negative. Bullying behaviour me thinks?

3 little piggies Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's a shame you only chose to highlight that

> small part of my post and turn it into something

> negative. Bullying behaviour me thinks?


Don't be ridiculous.


You wrote a post which, to me, seemed to suggest that the behaviour of these kids was normal. While I think that some of the behaviour described here (particularly the more extreme examples) is quite abnormal.


Of course I realise that your kids don't behave in the same way... that was my point.


I don't think we should accept it just because, your know, "they're teenagers".

Thanks Belle,


I try to see positives in most things and I guess my kids have taken that on board too.


I think it's always better to try and find some common ground somehow. I've always looked at things not just in terms of my kids, but the kids they are mixing with, learning with, playing with, living with. I get involved with their schools and the after school clubs they go to. The more informed you are, the easier things are to deal with hopefully.


Don't get me wrong, mine are no angels. Both are argumentative, ungrateful, often unresponsive or confrontational and most of the time pretty un-civil to each other. I'm finding the teen years the hardest to deal with, there is a constant battle of wills over everything. It's very, very hard, mostly unrewarding, but it's all part of the job and I'm just catching glimpses of the light at the end of the teen tunnel.


I read an interesting article which described teen hormones as severing a lot of the early brain links, enabling new, adult behaviour to be learnt. Parents are seen as an obstruction, it's their peers who are the all important people to them. If we can influence and engage with one or two, surely that's better than alienating.


Final thought - the lovely, wonderful, funny, cute little ones running around Goose Green playground today will very soon become the surly teens of tomorrow. Hopefully none of them will be the subject of similar future posts. But can you be sure of that?

3 little piggies Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Final thought - the lovely, wonderful, funny, cute

> little ones running around Goose Green playground

> today will very soon become the surly teens of

> tomorrow. Hopefully none of them will be the

> subject of similar future posts. But can you be

> sure of that?


I agree and hopefully, whilst they're still funny, cute innocent little ones, they won't have to witness violent and aggressive behaviour, especially in an area designed for them to be safe and have fun.

I also agree and well done for providing boundrys to your difficult teens who won't thank you now but will better learn how to navigate their way through life with out being mean, rude, violent or explicit around other people - especially little kids in a little kids play area.

> Hopefully none of them will be the

> subject of similar future posts. But can you be

> sure of that?


I take your point in a way - even kids from apparently stable, loving backgrounds can go off the rails.


But responsible parents should be able to make certain guarantees. That they go to reasonable lengths to know what their children are doing and who they're with. That if the kids get in trouble, they do something about it. That they don't threaten to beat up other parents who complain about their behaviour.

3 little piggies wrote


"And just to make it clear, I'm very proud that last week on the rowing course they was on, my 13 year old daughter and 14 year old son integrated with all the teens (including the big and scary monosyllabic ones). At the beginning of the week they were the only ones speaking to the overweigh, introverted and obvious outsider in the group, encouraging his participation and making sure to include him, whilst the others were making fun. By the end of the week he was a natural part of the group and his dad came over and thanked my two, as did the course leader."


Wow - your kids are like angels...


Very different, it seems, from the feral low life we are talking about at Goose Green.

There we go again with the "feral low life" crap. You sound nice.


> Hopefully none of them will be the

> subject of similar future posts. But can you be

> sure of that?



No one can be sure of anything, but not having the current teenagers in their playgrounds setting an example for them to follow would probably be a good start.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...