Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Today, I am working from Home, and for the forth time in 2 weeks I have answered the door to someone asking about my religion and do I believe in their own special God.


It is starting to scare me that maybe they know something is about to happen "The End of the World is Nigh" or soemething of that world shattering ilk.


I will admit that they are starting to annoy me now, espcially as last night they disturbed the Coven and our ritual sacrifice of a virgin (don't they know how hard it is to find a virgin these days (6) )


Is anyone else getting annoyed and what techniques (apart from the polite no thank you and shutting the door) do you use ?

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/4759-religious-callers/
Share on other sites

They aren't more annoying to me than the cold-calls I get from some call-centre in upnorthsville or India


But that's not to say they aren't ALL very annoying


I used to live with a Jehovas Witness - which was good because I didn't get any of them cold-calling. But they really believe this stuff. Like REALLY.. with no irony, wink or nod or nuffink. 144, 000 of us getting to heaven, people and that's it - if your names not on the list etc etc

I always wonder if the Jehovas Witnesses and their 'conversion calls' is a bit like Pyramid Selling, the more people they convert the better chance they have of getting on that final list of 144,000 thereby the people they convert need to convert more people to move up that list and so on...


Eventually there has to be a point where there is no way anyone else can get on the list so new conversions are actually not going to get what they signed up for....


I wonder if the religious version of the FSA has ever looked into this ?

Doesn?t say much for old Jo?s omnipotence if he could only make the gaff big enough for 0.0001352666854534551928832821803987%* of the people who have ever been born.


* Figure based on the best guesstimate I could find on t?internet and assuming the assumption of these lucky folk into heaven took place in 2002 which was the year of Rapture?s last world tour.

The Jehova's witnesses also beleive that the heavenly 144,000 will govern the new improved earth and all the ones who don't get into heaven and who aren't evil etc get to live in harmony on the paradise earth. They showed me, and it does actually say so in the bible.
I do just tell them to Fuck Off nowadays, I can't put up with their contstant interference and the damage that their (and others) babaric superstisions impose on the world ....I'm sure they've got some secret code on the pavement saying 'home of the devil' as they don't visit much..that suits me fine


Oh dear God (;-)) CWALD - that's in Revelations which, of all of the biblical texts is the most fantastical, farcical and irrelevant. (possible tautology alert, depending on your beliefs there) Besides, a cap on the number of people getting in to heaven is the least of our problems if even half the things in that book come to pass

Nope, just most other religions treat Reveleations as the black sheep of the family and tend to agree it's pretty nuts. Although there are many other books which have been dis-included in the canon anyway - no-one is reading the whole text. But now we are getting into an area of talking about religion and faiths generally which I know has upset some good people before and should perhaps be carried on in a thread oother than this one (where even religious people might be inclined to have a pop at door-to-door people)
I think most of Christendom realised a long time that the bible in general is a bit nuts and can?t be taken literally. Although the official party line is that it is. But it isn?t really only sometimes when being used to justify whatever activity or belief is currently en vogue for that particular denomination.

I just find it wierd when different types of Christians take or leave whichever bit of the bible suits them, but something as fundamental as what happens after we die, or who gets to go to heaven etc seems wierd to gloss over.


I am an anglican pretty much, but find it interesting to see what other denominations are saying.

Wasn't it Thomas Aquinas who came up with the idea that the New Jerusalem was an inner spiritual place and not to be taken literally and most of Revelation as parable or at the very least metaphor?


Since then mainstream christian religion has stuck to that with the fringes (Opus Dei are fairly literal on this i believe, I sat next to one for 5 years and he was pretty insistent that doom was in the air) and every lunatic religious preacher from Matthis in Munster through to Koresh in Carmel (ok it's really called Waco, but the alliteration is better) embracing the more eschatalogical interpretations (especially your loons in the religious right constantly bleating on about rapture, which is a pretty modern and unsurprisingly millenarian concept).


I could be wrong of course, and by all accounts the world will end....eventually!!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
    • Niko 07818 607 583 has been doing jobs for us for several years, he is reliable, always there for us, highly recommended! 
    • I am keeping my fingers crossed the next few days are not so loud. I honestly think it is the private, back garden displays that are most problematic as, in general, there is no way of knowing when and where they might happen. For those letting off a few bangers in the garden I get it is tempting to think what's the harm in a few minutes of 'fun', but it is the absolute randomness of sudden bangs that can do irreparable damage to people and animals. With organised events that are well advertised there is some forewarning at least, and the hope is that organisers of such events can be persuaded to adopt and make a virtue of using only low noise displays in future.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...