Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I'm not sure if Kessler could still do 168.

He'd automatically be 2nd tier level I expect if he did come back, but as mentioned the guys operating at top level in their prime are going to hurt him - he wasn't outstanding enough to now come back after 4yrs and make a big impact.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> He was a pretty big puncher, they say that's the

> last thing to go. Has DeGale's chin really been

> tested yet (honest question)?


A 30yr old Kessler might have caught DeGale clean on the button. I doubt a 40yr old Kessler would.

  • 4 months later...

I can see McGregor with an ear;y knockout....but that's just my optimism......Will be a dull fight with him chasing Money around the ring and not getting anywhere.


On a separate note I have had a couple of White Collar Fights. For one of them I trained at Miguels in Brixton.....a young lad was made to spar with me. The only reason i knew i'd been hit is because my nose was bleeding....i didn't see where it came from or where it went.....He's now doing really well for Matchroom....Isaac Chamberlain....

  • 4 years later...

Is Saturday?s AJ v Usyk contest simply a case of A good big man beats a Good smaller man ?

How do you see it panning out ??


The other mention I?ll squeeze in here is Amanda Serrano. Deadly boxer, very possibly may come up TWO weights to fight Katie Taylor next year.

AJ was outmanoeuvred, out-punched, out-thought, and outclassed.

No shame in that, Usyk is an anomaly like Lomachenko was.

I disagree with some who say no point in a re-match, AJ has a punchers chance and in fact did catch Usyk decently a couple of times.

Thanks to Wilder crying like a baby pulled off the teat and stopping the AJ v Fury fight (which I think would have happened by now) - that fight is very unlikely.

Wilder would have far less chance than AJ of beating Usyk.

Fury - I don?t know about this one, how does Usyk prepare for such unorthodoxy ?!

Either way, it?s all been shaken up and AJ will need to climb the slippery ladder again, I imagine tho he?ll still leapfrog those waiting in line, such as Whyte.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...