Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The deal's still to be made but yeah it appears close. It'll still be the biggest fight, money-wise, in history.

The endless speculation in the columns and the fever pitch it reaches at times like this are a bit tiresome though !

Just make the darned fight and get them in the ring - albeit 5 or 6 years too late. I think it has less meaning now than it would have had previously, so the hysteria is probably more a collective cry of relief than actually deserved..


Wilder fights Stiverne on Saturday so the USA could finally have a world champ - heaven knows they're crying out for one !! On ability, I fancy Stiverne (hopefully in (5-6) but Wilder does seem to set-up the right-hand windmill by blinding you with the left.

  • 1 month later...

We could use my pad as I've BoxNation, problem is I'll be on IOW !

If I can switch weekends (my weekends, not asking Floyd to switch his weekends for me !) then happy to host.

Pubs unlikely to show it cos it's West coast hrs - card probably starts around 1am !

Basically the other 'champs' in his division should be ashamed of themselves - Cotto should face him or go back to LMW, Quillin vacated rather than face Koborov and had nothing to say when Golovkin's name was mentioned. Andy Lee says he's interested but don't they all - he's more likely to face Saunders in Ireland.

The established boxers flapping their gums about GGG not having proven himself are increasingly in need of better strategies to not fight him.

The whole situation is a sad symptom of the multi-belt charade called international boxing.

I'll be interested to see how Chris Eubank Jr v Dmitry Chudinov (WBA 'interim' middleweight) works out after Eubank's defeat last time out.


I don't know much about Frampton or Fury's opponents, but expect Fury to win easily against some journeyman. Feels like Fury has been around forever and never really had a proper fight. Shame the David Haye thing never happened as that would have been a proper test.

I meant to post this the other day, quite a good piece on the state of boxing and why lots of the fights we want never get made.


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/31133135



Comments at the bottom all seem to be agreeing that it will be a disappointing fight ending in points win for FM.

someone told me that tickets for the big fight are $100,000 each.

I haven't had chance to check but surely that can't be true ?


Not sure who wins Carl Frampton's contest, I don't know the other guy at all (and am also reliably shite on predictions). Unfortunately I'll be in the country again relying on wifi so don't expect to be able to access ITV4 - saw the fight advertised whilst in the Castle last night.


Jean Pascal is fighting Kovalev soon I read, The way Froch handled Pascal some years ago you'd expect Kovalev to do the business.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hello,  I feel as though our apartment is damp. I would like to borrow a dehumidifier to ascertain whether it is or not. Does anyone have a dehumidifier that I could borrow for a week?  thank you,    Brigid
    • Post much better this Xmas.  Sue posted about whether they send Xmas cards; how good the post is,  is relevant.  Think I will continue to stay off Instagram!
    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...