Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Anyone see the Golovkin v Munroe contest.

After dismantling Munroe in the 2nd, Golovkin carried him for a couple of rounds 'for practice', before stopping him in the 6th.

Munroe didn't want to go on, when asked by the ref.


Golovkin now exposing the sham that is Intl. boxing, whereby none of the so-called MW champs want to face him - yet all the pundits recognise him as No.1 at MW and As being in top 5 P4P.


The only person I think could beat him is Mayweather, at a fixed weight down around 154.

Never going to happen. Ever.


Mayweather was a featherweight at amateur level and has come up through to welterweight now. That's the biggest his frame can handle comfortably. He had to fight Canelo at some weird catch-weight. He won't go up to light-middle properly.


GGG's was a middleweight amateur and now fights at....middleweight. No way can he go down and retain his power. He'd be crazy to try.


GGG should look to duff up Cotto and then Canelo. Once he's done, then take on whoever is around at super-middle....Ward, Groves, DeGale, even Froch (that would be a right old dust up).

I'm not saying Floyd will fight Gennady (who persistently asks for the fight), but he's the only guy at a do-able weight that IMO could defeat him.


Unfortunately Cotto/Canelo want no part of GGG, which was part of the point of my post. The WBC has told Canelo/Cotto that if they want to fight each other for the WBC MW belt they must both sign a contract agreeing that the winner fights GGG. Of course, they'll sign the contract, fight, then vacate the WBC belt. Sham.


I think Ring Magazine has Cotto as no. 1 MW.


I don't think the Ward fight could be made. Ward would want to boss the show with majority % of the money split, despite having fought no more times since the Super Six tournament ended in 2012 than Golovkin has in 2015 so far !


The biggest money fight out there is Floyd v GGG, so many people won't pay good money again to see Pac fight Floyd again. Incidentally, GGG would come down to 154 (fight weight), lighter than Cotto was when he fought Floyd. And don't forget Canelo was at an equal fighting weight as GGG when he fought Floyd, in the low 170s.


I checked out the most recent fight (March) of one of my current faves at the weekend, as I'd not seen much in the boxing press about him, if you check BoxRec you can see who he fought (can't remember the name) and find the youtube clip. Alex Saucedo, I think I've mentioned him here before.

Canelo was 152lbs when he fought Mayweather. Mayweather was 150.

Cotto was 154lbs when he fought Mayweather. Mayweather was 151


That shows that 150lbs is Mayweather's natural limit. Even if Golovkin could boil himself down to scrape under the 154 limit (and I'm doubtful that's sensible) he'd shoot up to closer to 160 (if not higher) when he got in the ring. No way does Mayweather give up 10lbs.


Daniel Jacobs, the WBA holder, looks like he can bang a bit (26KOs from 29 wins) so that could be entertaining but again, he may not want the fight. Peter Quillan and Andy Lee would also be entertaining. Contrary to some commentators out there I think there is more depth at middleweight than would appear. That's four or five solid-to-very-good fighters for Golovkin to seek out before he could realistically say there is no one left. That would also take him up to Hopkins record 20 defences.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> GGG should look to duff up Cotto and then Canelo.

> Once he's done, then take on whoever is around at

> super-middle....Ward, Groves, DeGale, even Froch

> (that would be a right old dust up).



Looks like you MIGHT get your dust up...


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/boxing/32828185

I think that could be a war!


Golovkin is a lot smaller although not especially quick. But he has, like Duran, hands of stone. Massive power in both fists.


Froch doesn't really do defence in a tradition way an as he's aged his reflexes have faded and he gets caught. A lot. But he has a chin of granite. Likewise, he has power, esp in that right hand that he curls up like a coiled spring.


If Froch takes it, and boxes smart behind a long jab and then peppers GGG with straight rights he can keep him at bay for a points win. If Froch trades toe-to-toe I think he'll lose although it might depend on how well GGG takes a punch - have we really seen him be hit hard before?

GGG has taken plenty of punches, Curtis Stevens got to him easy, Munroe didn't really have a problem getting through, plenty of those were hard punches, and Geale landed a huge one 1/4 second before he was KO'd.

Everyone says GGG gets hit easy, well if he does that includes hard shots, he hasn't faced any powder-puff punchers they all have decent KO records which means they knock people out. So their punch isn't in question IMO.

Good for him anyways, his career seemed stunted after his loss to Groves.

He's done well considering his opposition hasn't been top-tier.

If Groves gets a belt too we could have a good match-up between the two (and maybe Froch swoops down out of the wings to reclaim some world titles).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • There was another unprovoked attack on Monday this week on a young woman nearby (Anstey Road) at 6.45pm. Don't have any other details, it was posted on a Facebook group by her flatmate. Pretty worrying  https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EGfDrCAST/
    • OMFG is it possible for the council to do anything without a bunch of armchair experts moaning about it? The library refurb is great news, as it's lovely but completely shagged out - the toilets don't even work reliably. Other libraries in the area will be open longer house during the closure. July is a rubbish time to begin a refurb because it's just before the entire construction sector goes on summer holiday, and it would mean delaying the work another 8 months.
    • Licensing application for 2026 has gone in and they want to extend the event from 4 to 7 days accross two weekends.  There are some proposed significant changes to be aware of:   Event proposal moves to two separate weekends Number of days of the festival moves from 4 to 7 meaning also a change in the original licence is required Expected footfall in the park over the two weekends around 60,000.    Dear Peckham Rye Park Stakeholder,   Re: STAKEHOLDER CONSULTATION – event application: ‘GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’ – ref: SWKEVE000935   We are writing to you because you have previously identified yourself as someone who wishes to be informed about event applications for Peckham Rye Park, or we think that you might have an interest in knowing about this particular event application.   Please be aware that the council are in receipt of an event application for: GALA and On The Rye Festival 2026’   In line with the council’s Outdoor Events Policy and events application process we are carrying out consultation regarding this application.   The following reference documents are attached to this email:   Consultation information APPENDIX A – site plan weekend 1 APPENDIX B – site plan weekend 2 APPENDIX C – Production Schedule APPENDIX D – 2025 Noise Management Plan   The consultation is open from Tuesday 4 November and will close at midnight on Tuesday 2 December 2025   Community engagement sessions will take place on Wednesday 19 November.   If you would like to comment on application: SWKEVE000935 and take part in the online consultation, please visit:   www.southwark.gov.uk/GALA2026   If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact us.     Kind Regards, Southwark Events Team Environment and Leisure PO Box 64529 London SE1P 5LX 020 7525 3639 @SouthwarkEvents APPENDIX A - SITE PLAN weekend 1.pdf APPENDIX B - SITE PLAN weekend 2.pdf APPENDIX C - PRODUCTION SCHEDULE.pdf And just to add that councillor Renata Hamvas chairs the licensing committee. Worth contacting her with views on ammendments to the original license. I am fairly sure she won't grant any amendments, but just in case.....
    • Second time Aria has completed a plumbing job for me and both times he’s been polite. Communicative, kept to time and completed the job. He’s very helpful and tidy as well. First job was ball valve in water tank, not easy at all. He and his team were fantastic. This time kitchen tap cylinders replaced and tap tightened.  Much appreciated, Aria thank you.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...