Jump to content

Dog Snatcher?


Bunny19

Recommended Posts

No first mate, thankfully I didn't hear about the puppy ear portions. It now seems to be common for puppy litters to be stolen when they are advertised in the press. London Tonight has been running features on dangerous dogs this past week.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

sammy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> when we brought he he had to have it done, but the

> national dog tattoo register cAn let you know of

> local places. are you thinking of having your dog

> done. What breed you got?



Thanks for the info - will check it out.


S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really sorry, I have been away since the original post. Very difficult to describe the man, but of African decent I would say, very dark skin and quite thick set/sturdy looking. He was wearing a black tracksuit and a black woolly ?beanie? type hat and possibly had a moustache. The vehicle they drove away in was an old white pick-up truck that had one of those cabin things enclosing the back. Not much to go on there I suppose, but I was quite anxious and tried to stay my distance as best possible, but I still feel we were followed for a reason, that being the dog. In reply to some of the earlier posts, my dog is a pedigree and not that common, but I wouldn?t have thought attractive to someone who was looking to use her in any dog fighting or baiting activity. Dulwichmum, I really didn?t want to scare anyone, simply thought that if I posted my experience, dog owners might be that little more vigilant.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

Why is it that people used to have dogs to help

them feel safe - and now people don't feel safe

because they have a dog.

Are today's dogs a bunch of softies? Can't they

look after themselves anymore, never mind protect

their owners.



Can't win really!


Agressive/agressive looking dog = Menace to society!


Socialised and of good temperament = Waste of fur?


The dogs aren't at fault, it's the @/*?ing lowlife scum that are stealing them!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mick Mac Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Why is it that people used to have dogs to help

> them feel safe - and now people don't feel safe

> because they have a dog.

> Are today's dogs a bunch of softies? Can't they

> look after themselves anymore, never mind protect

> their owners.



That?s a very interesting view of seeing it! Maybe in former times it was like that but nowadays not many people have dogs to protect them - dogs are human?s best friends!

And I dont feel afraid because i have a dog I am afraid of loosing my dog! Or of people that want to steal my dog!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SteveT Wrote:

It is because of the lowlife killer fighting dogs,

that ordinary family pet dogs are being stolen.



You've missed an apostrophe and an s from the end of lowlife! Unless of course you believe that stealing family pets for the reward, for ransom or breeding as well as the use in dog fighting, is something gangs of 'killer fighting dogs' do?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • A bit like this: https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/apr/27/tory-staff-running-network-of-anti-ulez-facebook-groups-riddled-with-racism-and-abuse
    • Because the council responsible for it is far-left....   And you haven't answered whether it is worth diverting emergency vehicles because a few cars drive through the LTN and why some lobby groups have been so desperate to close it to emergency vehicles.    Emergency services hate non-permeable junctions as they lengthen response times....f you remember it's why the council had to redesign the DV junction because emergency services kept telling them they needed to be able to drive through it...but the council resisted and resisted until they finally relented because the emergency services said their LTN had increased response times....sorry if the truth gets in the way of a good story but those are facts. The council was putting lives at risk because they refused to open the junction to emergency services. Why? What could have been the motivation for that? So, in fact, it was the emergency services who forced the council (kicking and screaming) to remove the permanent barriers and allow emergency services access. So the council finally opened the junction to emergency services and is now coming back to re-close part of the junction.  Why?  Perhaps you should be asking who is lobbying the council to close the junction or parts of it or why the council is happy to waste so much of our money on it - who are they representing as even their own consultation demonstrated they did not have support from the local community for the measures? The results showed the majority of local residents were against the measure...but they are going ahead with them anyway.   In time, I am sure the truth will come to light and those rewponsbile will be held accountable but you have to admit there is something very unusual going on with that junction - its the very definition of a (very expensive) white elephant.    
    • A Roadblock that a civilised society wouldn’t allow. 
    • Now this is cycling  BBC News - Tweed Run London bike ride evokes spirit of yesteryear https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-68900476  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...