Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Can just imagine the tension in Quids' mind as he spends the evening trawling the various threads and, as he grinds away trying desperaately to compose a witty rejoinder, knowledgable quip or articulate point he notices that one thread has reached its 99th post and so, with a nifty bit of mousework, and nimble fingering, he types '100' and posts. cue self-congratulatory grin.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Similar to people's obssession with HB(ON

> TOPIC)

>

>

> Not similar at all Quids, your posting makes no

> sense, whereas...I'll get back to you in a while.


Quids, I haven't been able to give the matter the attention it deserves as yet. As you know there were all sorts of shenanigans going on about spelling today which took up some of my time.

And before anyone looks it up 'shenanigans' has no double 'n's, I've been up to them for some considerable time, so should know.

Added to that my employers had laid on some work for me today. Bastards.

But I know there's a difference, I can feel it in my water.

SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That may just be enough to make me join the i love

> hlb thread. .


SeanMacGabhann Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I know

>

> Well I know his reason, but I can't see what he

> claims to see


Aaah shucks Sean, thanks.

Hona, I think that my good intentions may have been somewhat misconstrued. I'd like to set the record straight; my offer of help to Giggirl and the other bandwagon chicks was genuine and heartfelt.


I regret that I can have been so misunderstood, and will try my hardest not to cause any confusion in the future.


Back to the number obsession.....

Oh Kells, forgive me my foolish misinterpretation of your intentions.

It's just that I've become so protective of the Bandwagon Chicks (particularlry the head of sorority that is Giggi) that I may have been somewhat defensive and not taken your assertion at the face value you intended.

Looking back at it, how could I have been so foolish.

Welcome good Kells and may I wish you many years of loving me and all that, this is a happy day indeed.

Made all the happier now that Sean M's joined in. Finally. Just joshing, SM.

I'm just off now to watch Question Time on BBC1 and the only thing that could possibly make me feel more joyous is if David Dimbleby drops the loaf on Piers Morgan.

Fingers crossed.

  • 2 weeks later...

Giggi and TLS you're timing as always is immaculate.

It's some sort of sixth sense you both have about when a judicious post from you makes all the difference.

You've changed my internal soundtrack from Nick Lowe's Endless Sleep (#it makes you want to lay face down on the grass so brown, where the sun beats down on the baking ground, to find sweet relief, in endless sleep#) to the life-affirming potty-mouth of Uncle Fukka by Terrance And Phillip.

Indiscriminate kisses and hugs to you good, good people.

  • 2 weeks later...

Oh no! I was trying to make a pertinent comment on another thread and inadvertently I've been and gone and brought this one back from page 6.

I'm utterly mortified by the whole thing. Please just ignore it.

And anyone who was previously in love with me and all that, you have my permission to withdraw your love.

It'll hurt but frankly I think I deserve it, it's almost as if I must be stopped. For my own bad.

Alan Brady Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I honestly don't know how you can live with

> yourself sir!!!


It's a thankless task Al but I have to.

I feel duty bound, which in a way is like being egg-bound but you experience more crap.

Just to balance out the other thread. Frankly if no one else is prepared to love me, then I'll do the job myself.

Is Ying Yang the phrase I'm looking for?

It might be, seems as good as anything else.


(For first-timers please read the above while imagining the author (if one can dignify oneself as such) searching, in a distracted fashion, through the pockets of a large baggy Harris tweed three-piece suit in search of a pipe).


As you were.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of Smoke Control law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all per se, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...