Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(Admin: I would post this in the General section but off and on for a month now I have not been able to post in there?)

People have posted and complained about people not being considerate on the pavements re: allowing others to pass when coming from the opposite direction. I would take serious issue with people who allow their bushes to encroach onto the pavement- in some cases up to 1/3 of the pavement is covered. I am going to look into this with the council because it is ridiculous in some places.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48975-clogging-the-pavements/
Share on other sites

I have done in the past - a rose bush thang was growing out and causing kids and pensioners to have to walk on a meduim busy road, so i lopped it all off and checked it over their fence/booting their side door when I finished to ensure they were aware of the actions.cat owning spunkers. now on the headshot list
Sorry, I didn't just mean you personally; more the 'inner core' of long-term Lounge-users who have had more than one persona. When people refer to a previous incarnation in a way that seems to have a bearing on the current discussion it gets confusing. Maybe there should be a character list somewhere to help other people catch up, including their best bits, like on the Archers website.

to be fair snorky may have got banned, i'm not sure any other aliases have, possibly from the lounge. i thin khe just retires out of frustration from time to time and then gets sucked back and enjoys the 15 or 20 minutes beofre someone twigs ;)


*Dons kevlar full head helmet*

Who were you RPC?...always wondered but cant figure it oot.


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe it's me... I don't mean to criticise anyone

> who has changed their identity as I'm sure there

> are many, me included, who lapsed for whatever

> reason and then rejoined later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...