Jump to content

Recommended Posts

(Admin: I would post this in the General section but off and on for a month now I have not been able to post in there?)

People have posted and complained about people not being considerate on the pavements re: allowing others to pass when coming from the opposite direction. I would take serious issue with people who allow their bushes to encroach onto the pavement- in some cases up to 1/3 of the pavement is covered. I am going to look into this with the council because it is ridiculous in some places.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/48975-clogging-the-pavements/
Share on other sites

I have done in the past - a rose bush thang was growing out and causing kids and pensioners to have to walk on a meduim busy road, so i lopped it all off and checked it over their fence/booting their side door when I finished to ensure they were aware of the actions.cat owning spunkers. now on the headshot list
Sorry, I didn't just mean you personally; more the 'inner core' of long-term Lounge-users who have had more than one persona. When people refer to a previous incarnation in a way that seems to have a bearing on the current discussion it gets confusing. Maybe there should be a character list somewhere to help other people catch up, including their best bits, like on the Archers website.

to be fair snorky may have got banned, i'm not sure any other aliases have, possibly from the lounge. i thin khe just retires out of frustration from time to time and then gets sucked back and enjoys the 15 or 20 minutes beofre someone twigs ;)


*Dons kevlar full head helmet*

Who were you RPC?...always wondered but cant figure it oot.


Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Maybe it's me... I don't mean to criticise anyone

> who has changed their identity as I'm sure there

> are many, me included, who lapsed for whatever

> reason and then rejoined later.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Girls In Your City - No Selfie - Anonymous Casual Dating https://SecreLocal.com [url=https://SecreLocal.com] Girls In Your City [/url] - Anonymous Casual Dating - No Selfie New Girls [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/vanessa-100.html]Vanessa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/molly-15.html]Molly[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/cheryl-blossom-48.html]Cheryl Blossom[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/carola-conymegan-116.html]Carola Conymegan[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/pupa-41.html]Pupa[/url] [url=https://secrelocal.com/girl/mia-candy-43.html]Mia Candy[/url]
    • This is a remarkable interpretation of history. Wikipedia (with more footnotes and citations than you could shake a shitty stick at sez: The austerity programme was initiated in 2010 by the Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government. In his June 2010 budget speech, Osborne identified two goals. The first was that the structural current budget deficit would be eliminated to "achieve [a] cyclically-adjusted current balance by the end of the rolling, five-year forecast period". The second was that national debt as a percentage of GDP would fall. The government intended to achieve both of its goals through substantial reductions in public expenditure.[21] This was to be achieved by a combination of public spending cuts and tax increases amounting to £110 billion.[26] Between 2010 and 2013, the Coalition government said that it had reduced public spending by £14.3 billion compared with 2009–10.[27] Growth remained low, while unemployment rose. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Kingdom_government_austerity_programme From memory, last time around they were against the LTNs and competing with the Tories to pick up backlash votes - both failed. They had no counterproposals or ideas about how to manage congestion or pollution. This time around they're simply silent on the matter: https://www.southwark-libdems.org.uk/your-local-lib-dem-team/goosegreen Also, as we have seen from Mr Barber's comments on the new development on the old Jewsons yard, "leading campaigns to protect the character of East Dulwich and Goose Green" is code for "blocking new housing".
    • @Insuflo NO, please no, please don't encourage him to post more often! 😒
    • Revealing of what, exactly? I resurrected this thread, after a year, to highlight the foolishness of the OP’s op. And how posturing would be sagacity is quickly undermined by events, dear boy, events. The thread is about Mandelson. I knew he was a wrong ‘un all along, we all did; the Epstein shit just proves it. In reality, Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew as well but accepted it, because they found him useful. As did a large proportion of the 2024 intake of Labour MPs who were personally vetted and approved by Mandelson.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...