Jump to content

Recommended Posts

my cat has acquired fleas over the last month and is climbing the walls scratching and shaking her ears.

i brought some of the Bob Martin flea spray and am trying to treat it as it is impossible to get her to take tablets or hide them in food (believe me, i have tried). My question is how often is it safe to use the spray ? I assumed it was once a week but I think it needs more than that... help, any cat lovers out there .. my poor cat is so miserable

Frontline Spot on works fine for our feline chums. Treatment on the back of the neck, much less stressful than spray or tablets/drops on food.

Once treated your cat shouldn't be experiencing the return of fleas so quickly. You'll have to consider treating your house/clothes/bags/under beds especially if you have carpet. There's various things you can try for the house.

KK we switched to Advantage a while ago but couldn't get any so went back to Frontline for a few treatments. To our surprise the fleas persisted (we had used this successfully for years). So we took the cats to the vet and got some other treatment - I think it was Advocate.


The vet confirmed that fleas had become immune to Frontline but said that Advantage would also work.


I have no reason to doubt this, there are threads all over the place (e.g. netmums) about Frontline no longer working.

It depends on the area. The fleas in East Dulwich have apparently become immune. My cousin lives in Cambridge and it works on the fleas out there, so it depends on whether your animal has resistant fleas or not.


It worked for us, then it didn't. I hadn't become more blase about treatment, so there doesn't appear to be any other logical explanation for it's failure to work.

I've been using Advocate on my cat for the last four months and have used the expensive vet prescribed spray all around the house that's supposed to last for 12 months. We're not getting bitten anymore and cat seems fine....but I can still see what I think is flea 'dirt' dropping off my cat (those black specks). Does this mean she still has fleas (although there's no evidence of them anywhere else)??? Driving me crazy!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Works for us... *shrugs* perhaps we keep a closer eye on the biters/our feline chums don't get them too bad in the first place/we treat before it becomes an issue.


If you treat them regularly according to the schedule on the packet you should not need to 'keep an eye on the biters' as there should never be fleas 'in the first place' because treatments like Frontline are meant to kill AND prevent fleas.


It's only since Frontline stopped working that it became an issue for us.


We have not had a problem since we took our vet's advice and switched - I won't go back to Frontline, but then maybe I'm just being naive in thinking my vet isn't on one of those Advocate scams?

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> or buy them online 1/3 the price!


Do you know any sites that sell Advocate? We used to use Viovet which was great for Frontline but obviously no good for our cats any more.


I'm pretty sure Advocate is prescription only but would be good to find it online.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, AFAICS, the "civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300" were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...