Jump to content

Recommended Posts

my cat has acquired fleas over the last month and is climbing the walls scratching and shaking her ears.

i brought some of the Bob Martin flea spray and am trying to treat it as it is impossible to get her to take tablets or hide them in food (believe me, i have tried). My question is how often is it safe to use the spray ? I assumed it was once a week but I think it needs more than that... help, any cat lovers out there .. my poor cat is so miserable

Frontline Spot on works fine for our feline chums. Treatment on the back of the neck, much less stressful than spray or tablets/drops on food.

Once treated your cat shouldn't be experiencing the return of fleas so quickly. You'll have to consider treating your house/clothes/bags/under beds especially if you have carpet. There's various things you can try for the house.

KK we switched to Advantage a while ago but couldn't get any so went back to Frontline for a few treatments. To our surprise the fleas persisted (we had used this successfully for years). So we took the cats to the vet and got some other treatment - I think it was Advocate.


The vet confirmed that fleas had become immune to Frontline but said that Advantage would also work.


I have no reason to doubt this, there are threads all over the place (e.g. netmums) about Frontline no longer working.

It depends on the area. The fleas in East Dulwich have apparently become immune. My cousin lives in Cambridge and it works on the fleas out there, so it depends on whether your animal has resistant fleas or not.


It worked for us, then it didn't. I hadn't become more blase about treatment, so there doesn't appear to be any other logical explanation for it's failure to work.

I've been using Advocate on my cat for the last four months and have used the expensive vet prescribed spray all around the house that's supposed to last for 12 months. We're not getting bitten anymore and cat seems fine....but I can still see what I think is flea 'dirt' dropping off my cat (those black specks). Does this mean she still has fleas (although there's no evidence of them anywhere else)??? Driving me crazy!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Works for us... *shrugs* perhaps we keep a closer eye on the biters/our feline chums don't get them too bad in the first place/we treat before it becomes an issue.


If you treat them regularly according to the schedule on the packet you should not need to 'keep an eye on the biters' as there should never be fleas 'in the first place' because treatments like Frontline are meant to kill AND prevent fleas.


It's only since Frontline stopped working that it became an issue for us.


We have not had a problem since we took our vet's advice and switched - I won't go back to Frontline, but then maybe I'm just being naive in thinking my vet isn't on one of those Advocate scams?

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> or buy them online 1/3 the price!


Do you know any sites that sell Advocate? We used to use Viovet which was great for Frontline but obviously no good for our cats any more.


I'm pretty sure Advocate is prescription only but would be good to find it online.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • It's called The Restorative Place. Also, the Fired Earth storefront is under offer too, apparently. How exciting...!
    • Perhaps the view is that there are fewer people needing social housing in London, going forward, or to cap it as it is rather than increasing it. We already see the demographic changing.
    • But actually, replacing council housing, or more accurately adding to housing stock and doing so via expanding council estates was precisely what we should have been doing, financed by selling off old housing stock. As the population grows adding to housing built by councils is surely the right thing to do, and financing it through sales is a good model, it's the one commercial house builders follow for instance. In the end the issue is about having the right volumes of the appropriate sort of housing to meet national needs. Thatcher stopped that by forbidding councils to use sales revenues to increase housing stock. That was the error. 
    • Had council stock not been sold off then it wouldn't have needed replacing. Whilst I agree that the prohibition on spending revenue from sales on new council housing was a contributory factor, where, in places where building land is scarce and expensive such as London, would these replacement homes have been built. Don't mention infill land! The whole right to buy issue made me so angry when it was introduced and I'm still fuming 40 odd years later. If I could see it was just creating problems for the future, how come Thatcher didn't. I suspect though she did, was more interested in buying votes, and just didn't care about a scarcity of housing impacting the next generations.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...