Jump to content

New Shops in Dulwich / Peckham

LondonMix

By LondonMix
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share
Administrator
Message added by Administrator,

Due to this topic being excessively long, a new 2024 "New Shops in Dulwich / Peckham" has been opened here. Please continue the discussion there.

Recommended Posts

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 5 weeks later...
scarlettbanks

scarlettbanks

Posted
Posted
New Japanese izakaya place outside Kanpai sake distillery in Peckham. Went yesterday and loved it - tasty and reasonable prices - v informal setting - dress warm if you want to sit outside, or you can sit in the sake place and drink warm sake. Soft launch yesterday and today - 25% off. Here it is: https://instagram.com/kanpaikitchenpeckham?igshid=YmMyMTA2M2Y=
DuncanW

DuncanW

Posted
Posted

Seems a bit harsh.


Soderberg has a distinct offer, Swedish, whereas Gail's seems a bit more generic.

It's run by a Swede and looks like it's privately owned, albeit part of a currently very small chain - this is only their second in London.

Gails is owned by Bain Capital.


And aren't business owners, by definition, bourgeois - were you hoping that site was going to taken over by a proletariat co-op?

Dogkennelhillbilly

Dogkennelhillbilly

Posted
Posted

Seems a bit harsh.

It is, but I've been in one. They're crap.

 

And aren't business owners, by definition, bourgeois - were you hoping that site was going to taken over by a proletariat co-op?

The brand and food are bourgeois. We have many bourgeois coffee shops in Dulwich. Poundland is a business, but it is not bourgeois.

Penguin68

Penguin68

Posted
Posted
The brand and food are bourgeois. We have many bourgeois coffee shops in Dulwich. Poundland is a business, but it is not bourgeois.


I'm sorry, but brands, and foodstuffs, are not and cannot be bourgeois, which is a definition of a state of mind of people - or the definition by one group of people of the political class of another group of people. Foodstuffs do not have a political class, The customers may be bourgeois, by someone's definition, or may be pretentious, and the products designed for them. Poundland is a business, and a big business. It may cater for a customer base that does not self-identify as bourgeois, but that does not make the company, or those who run it, any one thing or another. I'm betting that Poundland middle management may well meet your criteria of bourgeois. And not themselves shop there!


This is an ad hominem attack using early 20th century political vituperation. It really doesn't belong in the early 21st Century. And it's inappropriately addressed. You might just as well call the shops Kulaks. Or Intellectuals.

CPR Dave

CPR Dave

Posted
Posted

Poundland is not Bourgeois.


It's owned by Steinhoff International Holdings N.V., a Dutch company that is listed on the Frankfurt and Johannesburg stock exchanges.


Steinhoff has annual revenues of about 10 billion pounds


You can't really compare that to a company that runs a handful of bakeries.

apod

apod

Posted
Posted

Apparently Wagamama is moving into Barclays space on LL, just heard tth naot sure of the actual source.

 

Is there any truth to the rumours that Wagamama's and Poundland are coming to the Lane?

 

Poundland is - its replacing Foxtons. Its discussed here: https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=2286345


Haven't heard anything about Wagamama. Any source for that one?

Dogkennelhillbilly

Dogkennelhillbilly

Posted
Posted

brands, and foodstuffs, are not and cannot be bourgeois,


TBH, comrade, I'm not convinced of the accuracy of your definition of "bourgeois", either in a Marxist/Marxian sense or the vernacular sense, which both correctly describe Soderberg. But you obviously have strong feelings about it, so feel to imagine Soderberg described as "yet another coffee shop/bakery for the bourgeoisie", which I hope you find dogmatically acceptable. https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/bourgeois_1

 

You might just as well call the shops Kulaks. Or Intellectuals.


If Dulwich becomes plagued by as many Kulak-oriented shops (perhaps they would sell petrol cultivators, or yokes for oxen) as we have smug identikit coffee shops, I will come back to moan about the preponderance of kulak-oriented shops. Until then...

HeadNun

HeadNun

Posted
Posted

brands, and foodstuffs, are not and cannot be bourgeois,


TBH, comrade, I'm not convinced of the accuracy of your definition of "bourgeois", either in a Marxist/Marxian sense or the vernacular sense, which both correctly describe Soderberg. But you obviously have strong feelings about it, so feel to imagine Soderberg described as "yet another coffee shop/bakery for the bourgeoisie", which I hope you find dogmatically acceptable. https://www.macmillandictionary.com/dictionary/british/bourgeois_1

 

You might just as well call the shops Kulaks. Or Intellectuals.


If Dulwich becomes plagued by as many Kulak-oriented shops (perhaps they would sell petrol cultivators, or yokes for oxen) as we have smug identikit coffee shops, I will come back to moan about the preponderance of kulak-oriented shops. Until then...



I have to agree with Penguin here - 'bourgeois' might describe the patrons, but I don't see how a bakery can be bourgeois.


Anyway, this word surely no longer describes anyone these days, it's a pejorative way to describe social climbers in the past who belonged to the lower middle classes. Surely these days we're a far more class-less society.


These places might be predictable, perhaps, with a large dollop of twee, but not bourgeois.

Moovart

Moovart

Posted
Posted

Cos we really need another restaurant.....so much more useful than a bank!!!!




 

Apparently Wagamama is moving into Barclays space on LL, just heard tth naot sure of the actual source.

 

Is there any truth to the rumours that Wagamama's and Poundland are coming to the Lane?

 

Poundland is - its replacing Foxtons. Its discussed here: https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=2286345


Haven't heard anything about Wagamama. Any source for that one?

NewWave

NewWave

Posted
Posted

Is there any truth to the rumours that Wagamama's and Poundland are coming to the Lane?

 

Wagamamas is not what it used to be...

another chain..guess they're the only ones who can afford the rents now.


I'd rather have a Barclays bank than a Wagamamas.

And...

Who can really afford to eat out more than once a month these days??

we are both adults in full time work, middle income.. we go out for a meal once a month maximum

and I'm not talking flashy west-end I'm talking local.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Blah Blah
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Jules-and-Boo
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Jules-and-Boo · Posted

      Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • snowy
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By snowy · Posted

      That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • Dogkennelhillbilly
      Councillor McAsh defects to the Greens

      By Dogkennelhillbilly · Posted

      TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...