Jump to content

Recommended Posts

More worryingly (or me at least) was the fact that a much bigger coup was narrowly averted in the other byelection.


To avoid a loss by just a few hundred votes in a heartland stronghold should send shivers down the spine of the Labour leadership and campaign teams.


Something tells me it'll result in some brow-furrowing, hand-wringing and not a lot else.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Something tells me it'll result in some

> brow-furrowing, hand-wringing and not a lot else.



I hope you're wrong, though I doubt it.


I guess when it comes to the GE a lot of people will go back to blue or red and UKIP won't do as well as they're hoping. At which point they'll be dismissed by the "main parties" as a flash in the pan. But I think they will continue to grow until they're taken seriously.

I was in Chichester last weekend. On Sunday afternoon I had a bit of a stroll through the town and noticed a UKIP stall. The old girl behind it was wearing an oversized yellow T-shirt that bore the slogan "We want our country back." I thought... from who or what? Back to the 50s? I didn't like to ask.

Sadly, no.


That sort of pointlessly optimisitic delusion is what all modern political leaders have to dole out in these circumstances.


They're actually trying to say that the Labour share of the vte went up 0.8% from 2010.


Never mind that you surrendered a 6000 majority into a 600 one. And that 2010 was an electoral disaster. If you've only managed 0.8% in the intervening 4 years something is very very wrong.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> That sort of pointlessly optimisitic delusion is

> what all modern political leaders have to dole out

> in these circumstances.




I am sure you're right, it's just so depressing.


This isn't a go at Miliband, because I'm sure the others would have put exactly the same spin on it (and I think Ed's a good guy), but for me it's exactly what is wrong. The politicians think they know best what is best for us all, so they spin everything as a positive.


I'd honestly rather hear him say that this shows that people are not convinced, and that they need to hear the people more, rather than assuming they know what's good for them.




I know that would be suicide and that he can't do it, but that's what depresses me.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The LRB has a storming article on UKIP. Really is

> well worth a read all the way through for a

> fascintating insight into the minds of UKIP

> members and voters. And life in Thanet.

>

> http://www.lrb.co.uk/v36/n19/james-meek/in-faragel

> and



Very interesting as you said.

I can't stand the man but he's unfortunately accurate here:


http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100289196/after-the-catastrophe-of-heywood-labour-is-staring-down-the-barrels-of-ukips-tanks/


For a while it looked like Miliband was going to nail that "anti-establishment" vote with his attacks on big energy, Murdoch etc. That momentum has been lost and if he wins in May it'll be by his finger nails.

Perhaps - but at least it was popular! I'd take that at the moment.


Interestingly, the public are to the left of Miliband on a number of issues. Rail, energy and mail renationalisation, income tax, minimum wage, zero-hour contracts and rent-capping yet on all of these issues Labour remain silent.


Meanwhile they take a beating on issues where the public is to the right of them: immigration, Europe, crime, etc.


A bizarre mix.

Income Tax...you sure?


plus Labour haven't been quiet on Zero_hour Contarcts or Minimum wage (were you watching their conference??)


But those are 'micro' issues the biggest ones are defeceit (ooops, forgot that one David M...and C:) ); overall management of the economy and Immigration and a bit further down the list the NHS. Labour only doing well on one of them.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Interestingly, the public are to the left of Miliband on a number of issues.


And yet, the most interesting thing about these by-elections was the swing. Normally, the swing goes from left to right to left, depending on the colours of the government of the day. But in these elections the swing from Tory/LibDem has gone to the right.


Which probably means that the old-world view of left-right politics is now completely irrelevant.

"The LRB has a storming article on UKIP."


Pshaw, what's all this well informed nonsense, deflecting from the real issues of straight bananas, and errr Europe innit, Polish undercutting our wages, good workers mind you but that's hardly the point, ignoring the fact that we want our country back, but then what do you expect from people who can read!!!

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> david_carnell Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > Interestingly, the public are to the left of

> Miliband on a number of issues.

>

> And yet, the most interesting thing about these

> by-elections was the swing. Normally, the swing

> goes from left to right to left, depending on the

> colours of the government of the day. But in

> these elections the swing from Tory/LibDem has

> gone to the right.

>

> Which probably means that the old-world view of

> left-right politics is now completely irrelevant.



Some of us have been saying the same thing on the forum for years.....

StraferJack Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> "I know that would be suicide a"

>

> if that's the case why blame the politician - why

> not blame the people who would judge him/her for

> it?



Where did I blame him? The whole sentence was "I know that would be suicide and that he can't do it, but that's what depresses me".


I don't blame him, I don't even blame Cameron. I blame Tony Blair a fair bit, because he was a master of playing to "it" and set the modern standard. The "it" that I really blame are the stupid f**king people I share a country with. The ones that will vote based on who plays the part best and looks / seems most "prime ministerial".


I'm not the most "up" on politics, compared to someone like D_C (this is a compliment by the way) I feel somewhat inept when talking about this stuff (but at least I can admit that). But I am not stupid, and I won't vote because someone looks or sounds the part.


Hopefully one day it will happen, but at the moment I can't imagine a politician ever being able to show weakness and use it to his/her advantage. They have to be full of false bluster, and it's just a load of old crap frankly.

"This isn't a go at Miliband, because I'm sure the others would have put exactly the same spin on it (and I think Ed's a good guy), but for me it's exactly what is wrong. The politicians think they know best what is best for us all, so they spin everything as a positive. "


That reads like you blame the politician to me?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • CPR Dave, attendance records are available on Southwark's website. Maggie Browning has attended 100% of meetings. Jon Hartley has attended 65%.
    • I do hope NOT, wouldn't trust Farage as far as I could throw him, Starmer & co.  He's backed by GB News which focus's predominantly on immigration while the BBC focus predominantly on the Israel - Gazza conflict.   
    • Everyone gets the point that Corbynites try to make with the "total number of votes cast" statistic, it's just a specious one.  In 2017, Corbyn's Labour got fewer votes than May's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes). In 2019, Corbyn's Labour fewer votes than Johnson's Tories (both the percentage of votes and aggregate number of votes); and he managed to drop 2.7 million votes or 6.9% of vote share between the two elections. I repeat, he got trounced by Boris F***ing Johnson and the Tories after the Brexit omnishambles. It is not true that a "fairer" electoral system would have seen Labour beat the Tories: Labour simply got fewer votes than the Tories. Corbyn lost twice. There is no metric by which he won the general election. His failure to win was a disaster for the UK, and let Johnson and Truss and Sunak into office. Corbynites have to let go of this delusion that Corbyn but really won somehow if you squint in a certain way. It is completely irrelevant that Labour under Corbyn got more votes than Labour under Starmer. It is like saying Hull City was more successful in its 2014 FA Cup Final than Chelsea was in its 2018 FA Cup Final, because Hull scored 2 goals when Chelsea only scored 1. But guess what - Chelsea won its game and Hull City lost. Corbyn's fans turned out to vote for him - but an even larger group of people who found him repellant were motivated enough to show up and vote Tory.
    • I guess its the thing these days to demonstrate an attitude, in this instance seemingly of the negative kind, instead of taking pride in your work and have standards then 🤷‍♀️
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...