Jump to content

Recommended Posts

MP - I can still see Neil Orr slipping on that buggered up pitch when we were coasting at 1-0 against Chelsea to let them into score....now 3 points that night and it would have gone to the wire when I think we'd have beaten Everton on the last game of the season, as they'd have been out of it then...also we were just so knackered on the run in with the backlog

It still hurts doesn't it quids.

I dunno these supporters with their interminable comparative European title shot statistics, they don't know just how much a little success really means.


Spoilt they are, spoilt.


I wept at the end of the FA Cup defeat I did the stupid thing of actually daring to hope.

IMP sat numbed and then had scousers buying me drinks in a well meaning but slightly patronising manner all night in Cardiff...I still drank them! I presume you are older enough to remember 1980 but there are plenty of quite old fans who've never seen us win a thing....still that's the norm a lot of supporters..

Yep, just.

I celebrated the youth cup win like it was the real one, it was also my first exposure to a certain Joe Cole, so great night all round (6-0 on the night, 9-0 on aggregate didn't hurt either).


But you're right, we normal many simply roll our eyes to the so called big four less few than they should be, bleating on about what a terrible season they're having; plus I was very jealous of Ratty the other year!!

It's all relative though isn't it. 5 years ago Chelsea were a team that might win a cup, there was no big 4. Then they got rich, won a title, and suddenly fans had new expectations. Plus they suddenly got a lot of new fans who claimed to have supported for years, but that's another matter :-)

Keef Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's all relative though isn't it. 5 years ago

> Chelsea were a team that might win a cup, there

> was no big 4. Then they got rich, won a title, and

> suddenly fans had new expectations. Plus they

> suddenly got a lot of new fans who claimed to have

> supported for years, but that's another matter :-)



Glory hunters I think they are called Keef and I hate those types with all of my being!!!

Well no one else is going to say it (I wonder why ;-), so I will, well done to Liverpool for beating Real Madrid last night at the Bernabau. Liverpool limited Real to scraps, and bossed the game, and can now look forward to the 2nd leg a bit more than the other Premiership teams.


The team most likely to struggle from the PL quartet is United.

While you were sunning yourselves we all thought Rafa was quitting, a couple of bookies suspended bets on him leaving etc...

I'm (secretly) hoping all 4 sides go through to the semis, that would be press overhype central, and of course I'd laugh when you got knocked out then...;-)

matthew123 Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> The team most likely to struggle from the PL

> quartet is United.


You think that? What a suprise. I'm sure you're right, we are shit after all, we couldn't boss a game like Liverpool.

United will do a league and champions league double. I don't believe they will struggle in the second leg, I think they gave Inter a lesson in the first half in Italy that they will not have properly recovered from, to be treated like that at home is humiliating, and they will get a full 90 mins of that in Manchester. I don't think Sir Alex will allow Jose to do a "Porto" on him again. MU are in my opinion the best team in europe this year, they just have to prove it by winning the trophy.
I'm with Red devil, I want all 4 clubs in the semis. I'd love a Liverpool Vs United match up over 2 legs, I think it was an old wrestler or something who said "to be the best, you've got to beat the best". Very true in my book, and United are the best, simple as that.

Sandperson Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> matthew123 Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > The team most likely to struggle from the PL

> > quartet is United.

>

> You think that? What a suprise. I'm sure you're

> right, we are shit after all, we couldn't boss a

> game like Liverpool.


United are the top team in Europe - but it is arrogant to think you will steamroller anyone in your path; Inter Milan are a good team, very dangerous. They will pose a significant challenge in the 2nd leg, more so than any of the other teams playing PL sides so I will stand by my sober judgement.

I didn't say we'd steamroller anyone. In fact if you go back over the thread I said I thought we'd go out on an away goal. I also think that Real have a lot to play for and they are going to give you a game at Anfield. I would say that Chelsea and Arsenal - especially Arsenal - are in pole position. I think that Arsenal have the benefit of the weakest opposition (no offence to Arsenal) and I think that their progress might just kick start a bit of a resurrgence, in fact I wouldn't bet against them making the final...you heard it here first.

LIVERPOOL are officially the top ranked club in Europe


UEFA's latest rankings (over last 5 years):

1 Liverpool FC (114.077)

2 Chelsea FC (110.077)

3 Barcelona (109.403)

4 AC Milan (109.306)

5 Arsenal (101.077)

6 Sevilla (100.403)

7 Man Utd (99.077)

8 Bayern Munich (93.664)

9 Lyon (90.576)

10 Inter Milan (87.306)


http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/liverpool-fc/liverpool-fc-news/2009/02/27/liverpool-are-officially-the-top-ranked-club-in-europe-100252-23026354/

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...