Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Looks like a lot of people would like to know the answer to your question. I'm just nosey. What do you want removed and why? I have the impression rightly or wrongly that people have these done when they are under the influence of something or other and I don't see why you would if not. Being a Lady of course you don't have to answer.

LadyDeliah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Lol, no, I just want a bit of a tattoo removed

> because it was done wrong. I like my tattoos, even

> the ones I was drunk for 😁


As far as I know, you'd still be left with visible scarring from the removal, unless technology has improved and now leaves 'no trace'? Otherwise, is it feasible to add to the original design or incorporate into something else and therefore ink over the mistake?

My dad had an anchor on his forearm lasered off. The laser did a good job of removing the ink from the tattoo and didn't scar his skin. But where they lasered it's a few shades lighter than the rest of his skin and doesn't tan in the same way so he now has a "ghost" anchor on his arm. It's not glaringly obvious but you can see it.

Old fella I used to know in Liverpool had "Rita" tattooed on his arm along with arrow pierced heart. I commented that it was very nice, given that his wife was a Rita.


Turned out he'd gotten lucky, the tat was tribute to his "tart" from his 20s. He met his wife Rita many years later and chalked it up as a bit of a result.

  • 2 years later...
  • 2 years later...

I'm sorry for bumping this old discussion, but I really just want this to be know in the hopes it helps someone else.


I needed this advice years, and years, and years ago!


I have gone through a laser tattoo removal in East Dulwich and I would absolutely NOT recommend anyone to do it :|


It has messed me up for life both physically and financially.


If you go through the usual laser removal methods. Which I, again, do not recommend, not only that it will leave marks on your skin, so in reality, the tattoo will still be kind of visible if you know where to look. It is a very long process. And to be honest, very costly.


I had a hook up from a friend, and I have only paid 4000$ for 12 sessions. Which is a whole lot of money, but if I had to pay the full price, I would spend at least 6500$.


This also depends on where do you live, but in general, it is costly. And it took ages to finish, they have recommended me at max one session per month. So I have ended up getting rid of this tattoo for more than a year and a half, and to be honest, the tattoo was quite small. It was significant as a can of coke. If I had a more massive tattoo, it would take a longer time and more session, which means more $$.


Laserless tattoo removal is where it's at.


Unfortunately, at the time of my tattoo removal, I did not know this, I know about this only thanks to my brother, which bought this program last year.


This has a few pros and few cons. It works, and he was able to do it himself. Well, you have to do it yourself or ask someone to do it for you.


It is a long process, but I believe he has spent just a couple bucks on this ebook. It is definitely way cheaper than any tattoo removal cream I have bought.


And how long it will take to remove the tattoo with this method varies from person to person, their age and their skin. My brother got rid of his tattoo with in four months, I believe, and his tattoo was at least twice as big mine was.


I am not sure, if he were supposed to do something to treat it every day, I would have to call him about it, but hey it works and out of all of these options it is the cheapest one and yes you might spend more time on this than on laser removal, but your tattoo will be gone sooner than if you would go with the laser removal option.


To be honest, I do not know that many things about this, but I just did a quick google search and here is a good review of it: https://laserlesstattooremovalkit.com/dorian-daviss-laserless-tattoo-removal-guide-review/


To my knowledge, this is the only 100% natural option out here in 2019 to get rid of your tattoos.


I really hope this helps someone out there. Please save your money and your lovely skin and only use natural alternatives!


If I'm able to just help one (1) person not to commit the same mistakes I've made and to change their mind I'll die a happy man. Amen.


Nabil

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Dishing the dirt is generally fine when it comes to politicians and in Farage's case he often deserves it but  nothing illegal  has been done. It is not illegal for him to give his partner a sizeable amount of money with which to buy a house and have it registered in her name. He is 64 years old and his partner is 16 years younger and so he most likely is making plans to minimise IHT. There is a sliding scale for IHT but basically a gift is free of IHT if the gift is made 7 years before the donor dies. Farage is 64 years old and his partner is 16 years younger. In 7 years time, if he lives that long, he will be 71 years old. Given that he smokes like a chimney and drinks like a fish, his odds on getting beyond 71  years may be pretty slim.  A similar  process is followed by the "bank of mum and dad"  where parents  give money to their kids to fund purchase of a property. Many who are not cash rich will mortgage their home and so release equity to fund their kids property. We did it as have many of our friends.  
    • Week 4 fixtures...   Saturday 13th September Arsenal v Nottingham Forest AFC Bournemouth v Brighton & Hove Albion Crystal Palace v Sunderland Everton v Aston Villa Fulham v Leeds United Newcastle United v Wolverhampton Wanderers West Ham United v Tottenham Hotspur Brentford v Chelsea   Sunday 14th September Burnley v Liverpool Manchester City v Manchester United
    • They are being taxed into oblivion.    a lot of them, previously fully subscribed (we'll call you, don't call us) are no advertising desperately for new pupils, even paying for those bulk junk mail drops.   
    • More dirt https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce845w70g0yo
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...