Jump to content

Recommended Posts

If there was a house price crash and my property went down to its original value should I be bothered? Other property prices would be reduced too so if I wanted to move then, if anything, I get something more for my money? Or am I talking cr*p?

And when is a crash a crash? Do values have to drop a certain amount for it to be called a crash?

If prices crash at any given time, there will always be a proportion of 'owners' who will be mortgaged to the hilt on the previous value (or worse - see recent 125% mortgages), so could not sell up as they would be significantly out of pocket. This might seize up the housing market. There would likely be far fewer properties on the market. It might be difficult to move.


Many people are now borrowing crazy multiples, so with rates rising, things may get sticky.

To put in simply......Karter thinks that as London is now the financial capital of the world and Dulwich seems to house many city folk and people are buying houses in the area using their city bonuses ( fuelling prices) then Duwich will not be affected massively by a bursting bubble. London is working to accomodate the olympics and improving transport. Many folk around the country will undoubtedly lose out as they have over-commited and are not cash rich and rents may not cover mortgage so re-posessions may occur. I don't think many Dulwich folk will lose out but some may obviously will.


Just play it safe and don't over-commit I say or sell now at peak time as many are starting to do. The other thing that seems to prompt people to sell now is this homebuyers survey report that the seller must pay for possibly coming into play soon.Ok ok who's going to start slating what Ive said? (6)

  • 11 months later...

I am looking at the concept of a house price crash which is being fanned by the media at the moment.


It is an interesting thought, that if people who didn't need to sell / move didn't put their houses on the market, then the available stock would be reduced, thus keeping prices buoyant.


However as soon as the media start talking crashes, job losses in the city and so on (like they are now) then some people either panic or are forced to sell (due to lost earnings, inherited home or any other reason) which puts a glut of properties on the market and buyers holding back waiting for prices to spiral downwards.


I guess the real question here is, are the media causing the current crisis in house prices, much like they have been responsible for hyping them up to unrealistic levels over the past few years, or is there a genuine problem in the economy forcing people to sell no matter what they loose?


I believe that it would be an interesting experiment for East Dulwich to see what would happen if there is a reduced number of properties for sale, by choice of the sellers, thus keeping demand for the few available properties high and in turn keeping it a bit of a sellers market.

Would prices here fall in line with the rest of the UK / London, or would they remain as they are? It the latter then it would end up creating media interest into why ED is bucking the trend, features in Homes and Properties (or similar publications) suggesting that ED is the place to buy to avoid the crash and therefore attracting people to the area who have the money to afford the artificially inflated (bit limited availability) housing stock.


I also personally believe that should most people who don?t need to sell, but are selling anyway, then not accept falling house prices (stick to the price they expect), then the statistics for an area would show that the average house price hasn?t fallen (but may take time to sell) resulting in the area bucking the media prediction and general trends.


However this is all academic as it will only effect each one of us when we come to sell our properties, and at which time the choice is simple, accept the market value knowing that where you move to will also be at that new higher or lower market value, which ultimately results in no real gain or loss to people selling up to move on.


Is East Dulwich brave enough to take this on as an experiment (and by reducing available housing stock, maybe, just maybe we can reduce the number of estate agents (F for example) downwards as well?..

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Per Cllr McAsh, as quoted above: “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution. " Is anyone au fait with the Clean Air Act 1993, and  particularly with the state of 'Smoke Control' law and practice generally?  I've just been looking  through some of it for the first time and, afaics, the civil penalties mentioned  were introduced into the Clean Air Act, at Schedule 1A, in May 2022.  So it seems that, in this particular,  it's a matter of the enforcement policy trailing well behind the legislation.  I'm not criticising that at all, but am curious.  
    • Here's the part of march46's linked-to Southwark News article pertaining to Southwark Council. "Southwark Council were also contacted for a response. "Councillor James McAsh, Cabinet Member for Clean Air, Streets & Waste said: “One of Southwark’s key priorities is to create a healthy environment for our residents. “To achieve this we closely monitor legislation and measures that influence air pollution – our entire borough apart from inland waterways is designated as a Smoke Control Area, and we also offer substantial provision for electric vehicles to promote alternative fuel travel options and our Streets for People strategy. “We as a council support the work of Mums for Lungs and recognise the health and environmental impacts of domestic solid fuel burning, particularly from wood-burning appliances. “We are currently updating our Enforcement Policy and changes will allow for the issuing of civil penalties ranging from £175 to £300 for visible smoke emissions, replacing the previous reliance on criminal prosecution.  “This work is being undertaken in collaboration with other London boroughs as part of the pan-London Wood Burning Project, which aims to harmonise enforcement approaches and share best practice across the capital.” ETA: And here's a post I made a few years ago, with tangential relevance.  https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/278140-early-morning-drone-flying/?do=findComment&comment=1493274  
    • The solicitor is also the Executor. Big mistake, but my Aunt was very old, and this was the Covid years and shortly after so impossible to intervene and get a couple of close relatives to do this.  She had no children so this is the nephews and nieces. He is a single practitioner, and most at his age would have long since retired - there is a question over his competence Two letters have already gone essentially complaining - batted off and 'amusingly' one put the blame on us. There are five on our side, all speaking to each other, and ideally would work as a single point of contact.  But he has said that this is not allowed - we've all given approval to act on each others behalf. There are five on her late husband's side, who have not engaged with us despite the suggestion to work as a team, There is one other, who get's the lion's share, the typicical 'friend', but we are long since challenging the will. I would like to put another complaint together that he has not used modern collective communication (I expect that he is incapable) which had seriously delayed the execution of the will.   I know many in their 80s very adept with smart phones so that is not an ageist comment. The house has deteriorated very badly, with cold, damp and a serious leak.  PM me if you want to see the dreadful condition that it is now in. I would also question why if the five of us are happy to work together why all of us need to confirm in writing.             The house was lived in until Feb 23, and has been allowed to get like this.
    • Isn’t a five yearly electricity safety certificate one of the things the landlord must give for a legal tenancy?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...