Jump to content

Consultation on ?improving? the junction of East Dulwich Grove, Townley Road and Green Dale


Recommended Posts

@intexasatthemoment


At last night's Dulwich Community Council, Matt Hill, the Council officer, confirmed that the cycle lane currently painted on Townley Road with a dotted line will become a mandatory cycle lane with a solid line and a barrier separating it from the main flow of traffic once the Traffic Management Order has been signed off by the Cabinet member. The advance lights for cyclists in that lane, and the gate, will probably be added in stages after they have been trialled by TfL elsewhere. He said the delays were caused by a difference of opinion between TfL and the Department for Transport.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Irony is that the bordering private schools don't

> have proper covered cycle parking for staff or

> pupils but all wanted this junction made safer for

> cyclists and pedestrians.



Jags/Japs does have proper covered parking for bikes.

@intexasatthemoment


Matt Hill didn't say what the barrier would consist of. On the plan attached to the traffic management order, it's described as "Proposed 10.5m x 0.6m cycle lane segregation island to be installed, offset 1.5m from the adjacent proposed kerbline". I don't know if that's still the plan.

I came across this document by accident:


Sight Line

Designing Better Streets for People with Low Vision

by Ross Atkin


It's available for download as a free pdf.


It has a section on designing road junctions that are more helpful and safer for blind and partially sighted pedestrians.


It seems to me that design features that might do this have been removed from the junction in favour of yet to be completed changes that will benefit cyclists.


In all the paperwork did anyone see what appears to be the legally mandatory disability impact assessment?


I'd like to read it.


Is there an EDF member who knows about this subject?


John K

I spoke to some children today who use this junction. They think it a vast improvement for them. They're walking rather than cycling but still this is some good news from all that money being spent.
Well, let's keep proper monitoring of all road users, rather than ask a few children and conclude that ?200K+ was well spent. As with Melbourne Grove, anecdotal doesn't trump all other sorts of evidence.

I was wondering whether these were Dulwich Village children.


Or commuters from North Dulwich station.


I don't think it was ever established whether Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local pupils.

edhistory Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> I don't think it was ever established whether

> Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local pupils.



EDH,


We live on East Dulwich Grove and our two lads attend Alleyns, having previously attended DVI and Hamlet. How much more local do you want to get?


Tom

BrandNewGuy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well, he said they walked, so I assume so. So were

> they driven before now because of the dangers of

> the junction?


I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the changes to the junction have not changed the travelling habits of any of the school children using it, except insofar as the removal of the barriers make it a nicer experience to cross the road here. I'd be astonished if there are people who used to drive who are now walking because of the work done.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edhistory Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I don't think it was ever established whether

> > Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local

> pupils.

>

>

> EDH,

>

> We live on East Dulwich Grove and our two lads

> attend Alleyns, having previously attended DVI and

> Hamlet. How much more local do you want to get?

>

> Tom


That seems a rather snippy reply to a perfectly fair question. Without that sort of information about pupils' journeys (as well as staff), it makes it difficult for anyone to judge changes and improvements.

Going back the original Southwark consultation which stated:


"The key aim of the proposals is to significantly improve safety for cyclists and pedestrians at the junction, whilst ensuring that there is no adverse delay to traffic on East Dulwich Grove."


If a couple of children have said that they think its an improvement and my own have said the same. That's good then isn't it ? And that's all it is. No one is trying to use this as justification for whole exercise. No one was ever said that less children will be driven because of changes to junction.

Jeez.

ed_pete Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> No one was ever said that less

> children will be driven because of changes to

> junction.


Yes, that is one of the aims of the cycling campaign and one of the reasons for the extra funding, to encourage children to move from cars/coaches to cycling. And I didn't say it wasn't good that the children asked liked it. I suggested that it was only a small part of how the changes should be judged.

Fair point and I?m aware that it?s Mayoral policy to increase cycling in London generally. Hopefully the alterations to this junction will help in that regard though I doubt the change is likely to take effect overnight.

James Barber Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I spoke to some children today who use this

> junction. They think it a vast improvement for

> them. They're walking rather than cycling but

> still this is some good news from all that money

> being spent.


So what about speaking with any adults, making any independent and objective observations, speaking to the lollipop guy who knows the junction inside out etc.


Let's get some facts on the operation of the junction and stop these ineffectual interjections.

tomdhu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> edhistory Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > I don't think it was ever established whether

> > Alleyn's or James Allen's have many local

> pupils.

>

>

> EDH,

>

> We live on East Dulwich Grove and our two lads

> attend Alleyns, having previously attended DVI and

> Hamlet. How much more local do you want to get?

>

> Tom



Thanks, Tom.


That's 2 children out of c985 who will not be using the new pedestrian crossing.


John K

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • These have reduced over the years, are "perfect" lives Round Robins being replaced by "perfect" lives Instagram posts where we see all year round how people portray their perfect lives ?    The point of this thread is that for the last few years, due to issues at the mail offices, we had delays to post over Christmas. Not really been flagged as an issue this year but I am still betting on the odd card, posted well before Christmas, arriving late January. 
    • Two subjects here.  Xmas cards,  We receive and send less of them.  One reason is that the cost of postage - although interestingly not as much as I thought say compared to 10 years ago (a little more than inflation).  Fun fact when inflation was double digits in the 70s cost of postage almost doubled in one year.  Postage is not a good indication of general inflation fluctuating a fair bit.  The huge rise in international postage that for a 20g Christmas card to Europe (no longer a 20g price, now have to do up to 100g), or a cheapskate 10g card to the 'States (again have to go up to the 100g price) , both around a quid in 2015, and now has more than doubled in real terms.  Cards exchanged with the US last year were arriving in the New Year.  Funnily enough they came much quicker this year.  So all my cards abroad were by email this year. The other reason we send less cards is that it was once a good opportunity to keep in touch with news.  I still personalise many cards with a news and for some a letter, and am a bit grumpy when I get a single line back,  Or worse a round robin about their perfect lives and families.  But most of us now communicate I expect primarily by WhatApp, email, FB etc.  No need for lightweight airmail envelope and paper in one.    The other subject is the mail as a whole. Privitisation appears to have done it no favours and the opening up of competition with restrictions on competing for parcel post with the new entrants.  Clearly unless you do special delivery there is a good chance that first class will not be delivered in a day as was expected in the past.   Should we have kept a public owned service subsidised by the tax payer?  You could also question how much lead on innovation was lost following the hiving off of the national telecommunications and mail network.
    • Why have I got a feeling there was also a connection with the beehive in Brixton on that road next to the gym
    • Ah, thanks,  it all comes flooding back. I've actually been to the Hastings shop, I'd forgotten all about it, along with her name! Didn't she (in between?)  take over what  was then The Magnolia, previously The Magdala, now The Lordship, with her then partner? Or is that some figment of my imagination?  In fact, didn't they transform it from The Magdala (much missed) to The Magnolia? With flowery wallpaper covering the front of the bar? Which reminds me of the pub's brief period after The Magnolia  as the ill-conceived and ill-fated The Patch.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...