Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Quite Alan, who cares indeed. It doesn't really matter.


But if posters are being 'cornered' as suggested above then that does matter. It might be easy to spew bile and accusations when anonymous, but so too it is easy to keep on at a poster until they cave in. What is often described as bullying on forums is more a case of soemone having to have the last word. If you then have several people having to have the last word, then it gets quite messy. It should be enough to express a view and be ok about others expressing a different view, without a need to keep emphasising the point. Tone also plays a part, as well as written styles of expression. It's so easy to form the wrong impression of someone, and of what they are trying to say.

I can see when long established names take one person to task it can seem cliquey, but it really isn't.


In my experience it's a consensus that someone is wrong and the someone in questioning not knowing when to either say 'whoops my bad' or when to shut the hell up.


If you quack like a duck, the whole world is telling you you're a duck, but you insist through your orange beak and by stamping your cute little webbed feet that you're not a duck, that doesn't make the world cliquey ;)

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > light hearted post rather than heartfelt debate

> in

> > a largely ridiculous thread maybe RPC?

>

> Ah. And is the dismissive bit in that one also

> light-hearted?


it can be what you want it to be, I'm really not bothered at all in getting involved in a debate in the sort of pointless rubbish (including mine) that this type of thread results in. Tis' all pooterish and laughable in my opinion.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > ???? Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > light hearted post rather than heartfelt

> debate

> > in

> > > a largely ridiculous thread maybe RPC?

> >

> > Ah. And is the dismissive bit in that one also

> > light-hearted?

>

> it can be what you want it to be, I'm really not

> bothered at all in getting involved in a debate

> in the sort of pointless rubbish (including mine)

> that this type of thread results in. Tis' all

> pooterish and laughable in my opinion.



So you're one of the perceived clique, you're joining in simply to dismiss the discussion, and at the same time you refuse to be called to account.


Oh. Someone fetch Louisa...

Robert Poste's Child Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----


> So you're one of the perceived clique, you're

> joining in simply to dismiss the discussion, and

> at the same time you refuse to be called to

> account.

>

> Oh. Someone fetch Louisa...



Called to account for what?! Does it really matter who is in a clique and who isn't?


Why do you feel the need to make such a deal out of something that isn't of major importance?

Blah Blah Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I haven't been around long enough to know all the

> characters but I tend to associate the idea of a

> clique with recurring themes, behaviour. In my own

> case it the accusation of being a troll or another

> poster after a handful of first posts. That is a

> recurring theme of a small group of people, who

> never apologise when shown to be wrong it seems.



Or you've never actually shown anyone to be wrong. To be fair you'd need to be in the same room with a couple of other people at the same time in order to prove it for sure, and that's never gonna happen so we all just have to take your word for it, or not.


For my part I don't really care, but the fact remains that whether by coincidence or not, your posts are similar in style to a previous poster or two. I'm not accusing you of anything, I am just explaining why people jumped to that copnclusion, and saying that I did wonder myself. But I won't lose sleep either way.


I do remain convinced that DJKQ and Pokertime are the same person though, whether you are them or not.



El Pibe Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I can see when long established names take one

> person to task it can seem cliquey, but it really

> isn't.

>

> In my experience it's a consensus that someone is

> wrong and the someone in questioning not knowing

> when to either say 'whoops my bad' or when to shut

> the hell up.

>

> If you quack like a duck, the whole world is

> telling you you're a duck, but you insist through

> your orange beak and by stamping your cute little

> webbed feet that you're not a duck, that doesn't

> make the world cliquey ;)



What Mockney said, 100%!

see, easy to do.


davis strikes me as a persona rather than a person, no offence davis, which usually rings alarm bells, but I've been wrong so often it's almost a habit!


talking of habits, do we have forum catechisms now? someone should write them down!!!


Question 1:

Are you part of the clique?

There is only one Admin, he is the clique, we are all part of his clique.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • where I've got to with left politics is very much not defined by labels - when anyone suggests (for example and without judgement) "a reformist socialist government" - my response now is: "like where? Which country is closest to this ideal and what challenges to they face?"
    • I wonder why they didn’t use Fairfield Halls with 10 times the space
    • Was anyone commenting here actually AT the meeting?  I was.  Yes David Peckham; it WAS busy. I'd estimate about 150 people filling the biggest room at Ruskin House, with some standing at the back.  And the bar was quite separate with no queue and sensible prices the twice I used it.  To Insuflo I'd say that my reading of Zarah Sultana's piece in The New Left Review accurately admitted past (Corbyn) mistakes and sought to lay a better path for the future. Jeremy is respected by millions but has not been as shrewd or tough an operator as I hope she turns out to be. Precisely the progressive point she makes despite the fact some will try to cite it as a split.  I agree The Left has been guilty of in-fighting at the cost of political success in the past, particularly given FPTP, but some of us are incurable idealists who don't just give up and snipe from the sidelines. I remember a meeting at Brixton Town Hall in the 80s where a Labour Party member advised someone from one or other of the fringe Left parties to 'get out of your ideological telephone booth'. Very funny and accurate and I never forgot the expression.  Maybe The Labour Party is the expression of liberal-thinkers who suppress their disagreements in the interest of occasionally forming a UK government, but their current incarnation is giving dangerous concessions to violent Zionists and UK fascists. Some of us have not given up hope and seek to learn from the mistakes of the past with respect to the formation of a new Left party.  The speakers listed on the poster were, I thought, intelligent and eloquent. One was determined, for instance, actually to organise people to confront the racists attacking asylum seekers in Epping and elsewhere. Another informed us about TfL seeking to change the rules to allow the expulsion of about 70 tube staff from the UK for visa-renewal reasons and that she and others are taking action to prevent that happening. Practical interventions in the real world when The Right is on the rise, emboldened by Reform and its desperate manifesto.  Another emphasised the crucial importance of ecological awareness in policy-making, although alliances with the Green Party were a matter of debate.  A youthful presence (the majority present were, like me, grey-haired) was the contributions by members of the latest incarnation of the 'Revolutionary Communist Party'. One by one they did what that party does: stand up and say 'yes we support the apparent aims of 'Your Party' but really the only solution is revolution' (they mean Bolshevik/French style).  This met with little applause, I think because most people present know that that is not going to happen here unless things get an awful lot worse. Realistically a reformist Socialist government is the furthest Left the current British population could ever countenance in my opinion.  So yes; if we let in-fighting be caused by groups who really just wish to push their manifestos at leftie forums we won't even be in a position to 'split The Left' in the way Sephiroth suggests.  I have been a union member for 22 years, helped organise a unique strike of Lambeth College Unison workers in 2016, voted twice for Jeremy Corbyn as Labour Party leader, and canvassed for him in 2024 in Islington North. Yes; mostly I've lived under Tory governments and seen the welfare state eroded, but I will always resist cynicism and defeatism.  Last night's meeting reminded me that there are decent people out there willing to try to improve society, rather than accept this Labour government as 'the best we can do'.  Peace and love.   
    • a - you said you were done interacting with me, remember b - " police, judge, jury, prosecution and executioner"  - the not very bright person's response on any public forum when someone point out the idiocy of anything. I haven't prosecuted anyone, executed anyone, or taken part in any trial or jury.    I have judged tho but then so do you and so did the OP - so what? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...