Jump to content

When good neighbours become good friends - the Nunhead way. (Jacqui Smith) (Lounged)


Recommended Posts

Apparently there were paparazzi outside their home at about 7.00 this morning. My daughter came running in with this news. Jacqui must have still been in her pyjamas and eating her Coco Pops :))

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snorky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

>

> > If JS had rented a place for say ?1K a month

> for

> > 12 years, then it would be a bit more than the

> "

> > possibly up to ?200,000 " amassed since she

> > decamped to London in 1997

>

> No. ?1000 * 12 * 12 = ?144,000

>

> I'm not saying that the amount she claimed is

> unreasonable, but I would say that she's abusing

> her expenses buy renting a cheap room in London,

> then getting her family home subsidised. OK so

> most people who have ever worked for a large

> company have fiddled their expenses at some point,

> but as a politician, she should realise that her

> actions will be scrutinised in the public eye.





>

> But still, I have no time for this Taplin person,

> or the Daily Mail, or this so-called "news

> article".


Bugger - my mafs aint wot it used to be - you are correct- so lets say ?2K a month for a reasonable MP worthy centrally located pad.Dolphin Square starts at about 300 a week for a studio upwards, so my ?1K was a bit on the low side.

Yep, her 1k would have only got her a 2 bed pied-a-terre in desirable "Nunhead Village".


btw - I'd had never even heard of Dolphin Square until a looked it up just now... but it's not really a part of London I frequent.

dannevirke

I hate to say it, but these days I almost take it as given that a politician will attempt to line his or her own pockets (no doubt keeping within the letter of the law, but perhaps not the spirit).

Looking back, I certainly didn't feel that way 15 years ago... Perhaps I was naive.


A couple of years ago, I asked a friend of mine who has spent a fair amount of time with many MPs over the years, which MPs he would trust (following the departure of an MP we both felt was one of the good guys). He gave me one name.

gawd, as the more astute have pointed out, but many people STILL seem to have completley missesd, the wonderful irony of a Home Secretary in a governemnt that has done more than any other since the war to erode our right to privacy and intrude in our lives for *security* being snitched on by her neighbours** is delicious...


**twice a week during term time neighbours

One of the more powerful aspects of state surveillance in both East Germany and Franco's Spain was the official snitch living on virtually every street. You knew not who was in the pay of the 'social police', so in effect nobody could be trusted. The word of the snitch to the authorities was enough to land you in police custody; and your private life investigated in depth. Though in Spain, attention could be temporarily diverted with small offerings of cash.

City of Westminster Licensing Sub Ctee


3.29 Mr. Taplin had been connected with Legends for 16 years, 12 as licensee, and for most of this time, there had been no problems. He knows he will be monitored and that he will be visited often. He insists that he is a fit and proper person and that what happened at Legends should not be held against him.


This Guy is Famous!

And So is she !!- all in favour of working mums apparently!



Jessica Taplin, The One I Want.com


?I just wanted to say how delighted I am with the amount of enquiries I have had regarding the wedding manager roles-most exciting! Working Mums is such an inspired idea and a truly super way of utilising all those immensely skilled mummy?s out there whilst enabling them to build up a new career which is flexible enough to fit around their parenting role.?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • What a ridiculous plan. If this is to stop traffic "cutting through" where do they think it is now going to "cut through" via? Has the council produced any data on the scale of the problem on Ryedale - anything to back up their hypothesis? You cannot do these things in isolation as all it does is displaces traffic elsewhere. Dunstans is going to become awful - I feel for the residents there. Councils should not be allowed to implement these experimental TMOs, they are clearly using them to circumvent proper planning and engagement. Has anyone contacted the local councillors about this? The laughable thing was the local ward councillors were concerned about displacement from the wider Dulwich LTNs on their ward so is this an indirect acknowledgement that they are being impacted?  Ridiculous.  
    • I would never leave my dog tied up outside a shop nowadays. A large proportion of ‘dogs stolen’ notices feature dogs nicked from outside shops- fancy dogs, old dogs, mongrels , all sorts. Stolen on a whim, for mischief, for profit or as a bait dog to train fighters. A thief might abandon them shortly afterwards, but the heartbreak and confusion is already done and a reunion not guaranteed.
    • It's a terrible idea, will damage trade in Forest Hill Road and is just creating a nice private road for someone to enjoy. Congestion in the road is caused mainly by delivery vans, well, let's help stamp out those scourges. And an 18 month trial is at least a year too long if you are just interested in judging impact. And there has been no consultation at all, save, perhaps, with the privileged Rydale-ers. I live a block away in Underhill and I've heard only via social media. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...