Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I purposely put "obtain" rather than "paying".


Yes if you're paying for it then you're actively funding the abuse, and I suspect you'd have to pay for this sort of thing anyway.


But anyone watching this stuff (except investigators that have to) is encouraging the practice and shares responsibility. That is what I was trying to say.


But personally I'd still separate that from actively carrying out the abuse.

This is getting silly. I don't claim to be the moral Guardian of the world, we all have our moral compasses.


So for ME, all the people watching are taking part in the abuse, but the most.guilty person is still the person that can cross that line and physically carry out the abuse.


Lots of (twisted) people get off on rape fantasies, but most of them probably wouldn't be able to cross that line and rape someone themselves. To me it's a similar line.


Still guilty and deserving of punishment, but it's a different crime to committing the abuse.

Paying certainly shows intent.


But still unsure of Operation Ore unless there's other evidence (other than

the database - I think there was in this case)


I don't know the outcome of the concerns - Landslide seemed to have many

websites and paying for one gave access to them all - whether you knew it or

not


http://www.duncancampbell.org/content/operation-ore

As far as we know from what has been reported publicly, the material was of child nudity in "athletic and recreational scenes, but not explicit sexual acts". For sure, that's a nasty perversion of the images in question, exploiting them for thrills. I'm just saying though... all this talk on here about complicity in assault, and supporting the origination of sexually abusive images, is probably bollocks. I have no problem with us all being appalled - I'm appalled - but there's no reason to embellish what has been reported with what else you think might maybe also have happened, but have zero evidence for.


In Germany, there are politicians who downloaded from the same site. We don't even know who they are, because German law does not classify non-sexual images as illegal. Meanwhile in England, a local vicar has taken his own life.


I'm not saying he shouldn't have been ashamed: his actions exploited children, shamefully. I am saying that there is a massive lack of perspective here, both in a man preferring suicide over shame and punishment, and in the way that all the undoubtedly good things he accomplished in most of his life have now been entirely negated by a few hours of furtive onanism whilst somewhere in the Bundestag, reputations remain intact despite exactly the same actions.

Good post Peckham Ryu (how is Peckham Ken? ;-)) I was commenting on a more general point, and hadn't read every post on the thread, so wasn't commenting too specifically.


It is very interesting what you say about Germany. I wonder what public opinion would be there...

Hi to the person who thinks I am a fraud. I can assure you that I am indeed Charlie's cousin, my father was Charlie's mum were brother and sister & he spent a lot of time with us, so yes I would say I know him very well.& am entitled to my opinions just as you are to yours, however I would prefer it if you would get your facts straight first.

I said


Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Finally, whether or not the poster claiming to be

> his cousin is actually his cousin, I take with a

> pinch of salt their claim that he had a lovely

> happy childhood, because you don't even

> necessarily know that if you're living in the same

> home as an abused sibling. A cousin wouldn't

> know.



I never called you a fraud or said you were not entitled to an opinion. And indeed your opinion on the man is probably better informed than most.


But I stand by my point. Even a sibling living under the same roof as an abused child may not know what's going on, so a cousin, even a close one, wouldn't necessarily know what was happening. That is a fair comment.


But either way I am sorry for your family's loss and all the added stuff that has come with it.

Defo with Jeremy on this. If there was no demand there would be no incentive for people to create these videos. Whether he paid or not is a red herring, he is very much part of the overall crime.


And to be in a position of trust with children is very worrying.


Personally I don't put my children in contact with anyone who is trusted because he is the public face of a church or religion. All too respectful and often without justification as can be evidenced here and I countless other cases over the decades.

..

But you did indeed doubt that I am Charlie's cousin & I quote "I doubt the poster calling herself his cousin is actually his cousin, I take with a pinch of salt". again I never said he wasn't abused I simply stated that he had a very happy childhood along with his other 2 sisters and 2 brothers.

You have just made that up, what I said can be seen by anyone who wants to scroll up.


I said "whether or not the poster claiming to be his cousin is actually his cousin" I didn't say I thought you were or were not.


Anyway, wish I'd never clicked on this grim thread yesterday, I was happier knowing nothing about the whole sorry affair.

peckham_ryu Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> As far as we know from what has been reported

> publicly, the material was of child nudity in

> "athletic and recreational scenes, but not

> explicit sexual acts". For sure, that's a nasty

> perversion of the images in question, exploiting

> them for thrills. I'm just saying though... all

> this talk on here about complicity in assault, and

> supporting the origination of sexually abusive

> images, is probably bollocks. I have no problem

> with us all being appalled - I'm appalled - but

> there's no reason to embellish what has been

> reported with what else you think might maybe also

> have happened, but have zero evidence for.

>


Where was this reported peckham ryu, thats not what

was reported here.


http://www.southwarknews.co.uk/news/east-dulwich-child-porn-vicar-took-his-own-life-inquest-told/

Hadn't seen that story. The Operation Spade material which triggered the police investigation was the low level stuff (see the Wikipedia links and sources linked earlier in this thread, or type Operation Spade into a search engine for the reports). It is because it was so low level that the UK authorities did not get around to dealing with it for 2 years, which I suspect says something about all the really sick stuff they have to prioritise.


If the anonymous quotation in the Southwark News is reliable, then that does make matters as bad as can be really. I guess when an offender does himself in and thus prevents the criminal justice system from determining what he did, then he leaves himself open to being judged by others based on hearsay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Where did I say he did a good job? Yup and Corbyn was very close to Len McCluskey and funded by Unite wasn't he...they're all as bad as each other... Labour have to purge their party of the far-left - they're a disaster. Allan Johnson summed it up so well on election night in 2019....  
    • Thank you for the detailed advise @trinidad It is definitely damage we are concerned about. I don’t think Evri would agree to pay the bill to fix our gate or letter box if they were to be damaged as a result of their delivery drivers helper. Our doorbell can be heard from outside when rung so we don’t quite believe the aggressive simultaneous door/letter box banging is necessary. It can be quite a shock it is done very aggressively.  I’ll definitely action the steps you’ve kindly provided along with a phone call tomorrow. I do sympathise with the role drivers have and how busy they are, which is why we tried communicating directly with her but sadly we haven’t succeeded 
    • What outcome would you like? Disciplinary action? Not to have the driver back? Retraining? I know there is alot of pressure on drivers to deliver within a set day. if he slams the gate, is it evidence he is causing damage, or is the noise a irritant to yourself? You could put a sign up or buy a signing asking to close the gate gentle???? can you hear the door bell from the door? he might be ringing, not hearing and therefore knocking. In trhe notes section of the be livery page, there is a note section, although there is not 100 per cent these notes would be read as these drivers are constantly rushing.  I did a google search for you, i found this and you can try the envri website Contact Us | Evri   To complain to Evri, you can follow these steps: Contact Customer Service: Call Evri's customer service at 0330 808 5456 for assistance with your complaint.    1 Write a Letter: Address your complaint to Capitol House, 1 Capitol Close, Morley, Leeds, West Yorkshire, LS27 0WH.    1 Use the Official Website: Visit the Evri complaints page on their official website for detailed instructions on how to submit a complaint.    2 Email or Call for Specific Issues: For issues like missing or damaged parcels, you can email or call 0800 988 8888, which is free to call.    1 These methods will help you effectively communicate your concerns to Evri.   My driver is called anthony, he is brilliant to be honest. I cant fault him.
    • When I have more time and energy, I will look up the actual number of votes cast for each party in that election, rather than the number of seats won. I'm interested to see that you apparently  think that  Boris Johnson did a good job of "leading the country through Covid." Is your memory really that short? I won't stoop to calling Johnson and his cronies names in the way that you seem to think is appropriate for left wing politicians. At least the left wing politicians have some semblance of morals and a concern for people who aren't in some over privileged inner circle and/or raking in money for themselves on the back of an epidemic. I'm not going to open a can of worms on here  by commenting on the disgraceful so called "purge". 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...