Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Administrator Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> karter Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Can't be BBW, ADMIN would have terminated his

> IP

> > addy him by now.

>

> Not necessarily, even though Alan Brady and



> bigbadwolf are the same people, s/he has not tried

> to do anything wrong other than start a joke

> thread.



Shit.

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Or you could always do the same as Honaloochie.

> Because I've had a long day and I'm not feeling

> particularly bright, so be gentle with me!


You could of course BBW.

Though quite what developing a devotion to Mott The Hoople, an above average waist size and a completetely inappropriate fixation on Sarah out of Girls Aloud has to do with anything I'm not sure.

But of course, be my guest.

HonaloochieB Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Kells Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Or you could always do the same as Honaloochie.

>

> > Because I've had a long day and I'm not feeling

> > particularly bright, so be gentle with me!

>

> You could of course BBW.

> Though quite what developing a devotion to Mott

> The Hoople, an above average waist size and a

> completetely inappropriate fixation on Sarah out

> of Girls Aloud has to do with anything I'm not

> sure.

> But of course, be my guest.


I meant start your very own "I'm in love with...." thread

Ohh Foxy.....


Standin' there naked with everyone one pointing at you........mocking your vanity.....ah ha ha


(...oh maybe the guilt is part of the pleasure...mmm.)





ohh lastly....please Sir can I have some more.......of this ritual humiliation.....ahh haa hhaa hha


Woof

Kells Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> HonaloochieB Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Kells Wrote:

> >

> --------------------------------------------------

>

> > -----

> > > Or you could always do the same as

> Honaloochie.

> >

>

> I meant start your very own "I'm in love with...."

> thread


Sorry to veer OT but Kells I won't have LuluToo's tender feelings and motives besmirched.

She started the thread as an act of genuine devotion and to suggest it was a tawdry act of what I suppose you would describe as self-gratification on my part is to belittle her unrequited longing.

Not to mention the other chicks who jumped on the bandwagon. Or for that matter Tony London Suburbs.

For myself I ask nothing, but please think of the others when making groundless accusations.

Thank you.


Sorry BBW et al, as you were.

See Kells, you've scalded the feelings of the leading bandwagon chick now (that's strictly entre nous Giggi, don't want rancour among the BCs).

Now Kells I'm no pyschologist but maybe there are some sublimated feelings here.

Don't bottle them up, they can lead to all sorts of mind complications in later life.

The thread you seek is on page 6. Fifth one down.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Actually I don't think so. What caused the problem was the ban on councils using the revenues from sales to build more houses. Had councils been able to reinvest in more housing then we would have had a boom in building. And councils would have been relieved, through the sales, of the cost of maintaining old housing stock. Thatcher believed that council tenants didn't vote Conservative, and home owners did. Which may have been, at the time a correct assumption. But it was the ban on councils building more from the sales revenues which was the real killer here. Not the sales themselves. 
    • I agree with Jenjenjen. Guarantees are provided for works and services actually carried out; they are not an insurance policy for leaks anywhere else on the roof. Assuming that the rendering at the chimney stopped the leak that you asked the roofer to repair, then the guarantee will cover that rendering work. Indeed, if at some time in the future it leaked again at that exact same spot but by another cause, that would not be covered. Failure of rendering around a chimney is pretty common so, if re-rendering did resolve that leak, there is no particular reason to link it to the holes in the felt elsewhere across the roof. 
    • Hey, I am on the first floor and I am directly impacted if roof leaks. We got a roofing company to do repair work which was supposed to be guaranteed. However, when it started leaking again, we were informed that the guarantee is just for a new roof and not repair work. Each time the company that did the repair work came out again over the next few years, we had to pay additional amounts. The roof continues to leak, so I have just organised another company to fix the roof instead, as the guarantee doesn't mean anything. 
    • Fernando came and sorted out our very overgrown garden.  He is a very friendly chap, works meticulously and charges very fair prices.   We’ve been using his Services for many years now and will continue to do so.    Here are his contact details if you have any gardening questions: Fernando - 07946 757938       
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...