Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Help-Ma-Boab Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Danish Detective programmes (SkandiNoir?)



Yep, agree with this. And the Bake Off, how the hell is that so huge?!?!



But this is getting too general, of course people are saying Big Brother and x factor.


What I'm interested in are those things that your mates / like minded people are all raving about (either now or in the past), which you may even have pretended to enjoy, whilst actually thinking "this is really shit".




DISCLAIMER: I have seen Withnail & I quite a few times, and don't think it's shite, just not as hilarious as everyone else in the room seemed to find it EVERY time.

Fair shout.


I do wonder whether we all look back on it through rose tinted nostalgia goggles.


I had some lovely times in there, but usually during the day when myself and a couple of friends would all be on sickies. Would sometimes go there for a last drink after the pub, but quite often there were some people in there that I really didn't like, and it was too busy to move.


But as you say, it WAS a bit different, and I think that's what people were desperately keen for back then.

After seeing sushi in that list I was going to say seafood. But that wouldn't really be fair, because it's just something I don't like, not don't get.



But then that led me to think of fads in food that I don't get, and hog roasts and pulled pork sprang to mind.


I'll happily eat both, and have nothing against them, but I have no idea why they both became so popular, as neither are anything particularly special.




Pulled pork does get extra points for having an excellent "Carry On-esque" name though.

Almost every subgenre of electronic dance music. A four-bar phrase repeated over and over again, punctuated by various noises or nonsensical words. Rubbish. (With a few rare but notable exceptions).


Olives. They taste disgusting.


Flat Whites. We already have enough combinations of coffee/water/milk, you're just being pretentious.


Shakespeare. The tragedies aren't exactly heartwrenching. The comedies are tragically unfunny. The script format doesn't lend itself to enjoyable/involving reading, and you need a glossary to understand it. On stage it is almost always hammy and over-acted. No thanks!

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Shakespeare. The tragedies aren't exactly heartwrenching. The comedies are tragically

> unfunny. The script format doesn't lend itself to enjoyable/involving reading, and you need a

> glossary to understand it. On stage it is almost always hammy and over-acted. No thanks!


Thank goodness - I thought that one was just me.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I edited my post because I couldn't be sure we were talking about politicians and I couldn't be bothered to read it all back. But it was off the back of a thread discussing labour councillors, so it went without saying really and I should have left it.  What I said was 'There's something very aggressive about language like that - it's not big and it's not clever. Some of the angry energy that comes from the far left is pretty self-defeating.' (In relation to a labour councillor rather immaturely, in my view, wearing a jumper that read 'fuck the Tories').  But I don't recall saying that "violent rhetoric" is exclusively the domain of the left wing. So I do think you're taking a bit of a bit of leap here. 
    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...