Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh Moos sweetie, you are too nice! Mikecg, don't take it as a sign of love, take it as a sign we are family (you are a poor financially strapped little brother, and I am a fabulously wealthy and super attractive and successful older sibling!).


Mr Wolf darling


(I just wanted to call you darling then... I can't really explain why).


Michael dear, stop talking about your scars - they will all want one!

dulwichmum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> All this testosterone in one place - OHMYGOD... I

> adore a good ruck!



Dear DM


Luckily for you (in this case) the 'R' key is next to the 'F' key on the keyboard. Otherwise you could have gotten into deep shig with Admin.

brum Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> dulwichmum Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Brum darling!

> >

> > Do I need to remind you that I am a married

> lady?

> >

>

> Whenever you say this, an image of David Walliams

> in Little Britain jumps into my head. Please don't

> say it any more as is quite upsets me.


xxxxxx


:))

No not at all DM.... I love to think of you resplendent in all your fabulosity and yet - dare I say it - incredibly sexy too. I understand completely that marital decorum forbids me to venture further - indeed, the old adage 'you can look, but you can't touch' I find to be quite irresistible. Besides, there's room on this forum for just one retired brickie from Penge - me! ;-)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...