Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Yes, apparently, according to the tedious and predictable Carole Cadwalladr, East Dulwich (SE22) is in Peckham (SE15).


She has to use this argument as she never bothered to get out of bed and doorstep those shabby neighbours of Jacqui's on Ivydale Rd. She consequently needed some way of using EDF comments to represent what 'the neighbours' might say, as it were. Ha ha.


Since when has quoting ED Forum anon. comments been a legitimate placeholder for actually talking to anybody? This is vaguely acceptable on a local rag with few resources (South London Stress...), but not on a national newspaper. Unless you're The Sun.


And then they, 'journalists', and the mainstream press, go on about how bloggers 'don't do research' etc. etc., and are so unreliable.


I do wish so-called journalists would get off their fat arses and get back to actually finding out something most people don't already know; from primary sources.


In contrast, I was quite impressed by the amount of actual local leg-work that went into the first edition of Southwark News - Dulwich & Herne Hill Edition.

What snotty comments from Carole Cadwalladr indeed.


I can't think of two neighbours who are nearly as geographically, economically, culturally and postally as different as ED and Peckham. Historically, apart from proximity there's little that links the two towns.


I'm sure than many Peckham residents will be disturbed to be associated with such a den of iniquity.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> What snotty comments from Carole Cadwalladr

> indeed.

>

> I can't think of two neighbours who are nearly as

> geographically, economically, culturally and

> postally as different as ED and Peckham.

> Historically, apart from proximity there's little

> that links the two towns.

>

> I'm sure than many Peckham residents will be

> disturbed to be associated with such a den of

> iniquity.


There is a tongue so firmly in its cheek here, huge-nut

Get real people, she's a journalist, they tend to be lazy and write crap...albeit sometimes eloquently. I can't help giggling at the outrage at this piece, just because it's saying SE22 is SE15 compared to lack of comment on the acres of newsprint everyday that are wrong, bad and often dangerous......

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Get real people, she's a journalist, they tend to

> be lazy and write crap...albeit sometimes

> eloquently. I can't help giggling at the outrage

> at this piece, just because it's saying SE22 is

> SE15


No, because she doesn't get off her actual arse to do any actual journalism. That was my point. The SE15/SE22 thing was merely a by-product of her general laziness.



compared to lack of comment on the acres of

> newsprint everyday that are wrong, bad and often

> dangerous......


Oh, don't get me going. I've done pieces myself that were slaughtered by the so-called night editor (Mr Clueless) that still (years later) have not been corrected online by the relevant - self-same - publication.

andymat Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's disgusting. We pay considerably more to rent

> in SE22 rather than we did in SE15. I can't

> believe it. East Dulwich is certainly no Peckham.

> There's a lot less chicken shops for start


Hilarious, nice one real-andy.

Louisiana - I;ve always been interested in this...I work for a broadcaster and have had occasion to follow up "stories" in the national papers. I recall wasting an entire morning doing just that with a front page piece in the FT - only to discover it was entirely bogus. Facts, dates, everything was wrong. All this despite the boldly emblazened byline and winsome picture of the miscreant journo who had penned this turd. I also have a mate who works at a big national organisation. She found herself quoted extensively in a broadsheet. She has dealings with that particular journo on a regular basis - and had she spoken to him, she would have said pretty much what she was quoted as saying.Only trouble is, she hadnt spoken to himk on that occasion. The Guaradian pulled a similar stunt with another mate of mine.


My question is - is it the night/sub editor who makes this shit up - or is it the actual writer ( not you, obviously!)?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • The current wave of xenophobia is due to powerful/influential people stirring up hatred.  It;'s what happened in the past, think 1930s Germany.  It seems to be even easier now as so many get their information from social media, whether it is right or wrong.  The media seeking so called balance will bring some nutter on, they don't then bring a nutter on to counteract that. They now seem to turn to Reform at the first opportunity. So your life is 'shite', let;s blame someone else.  Whilst sounding a bit like a Tory, taking some ownership/personal responsibility would be a start.  There are some situations where that may be more challenging, in deindustrialised 'left behind' wasteland we can't all get on our bikes and find work.  But I loathe how it is now popular to blame those of us from relatively modest backgrounds, like me, who did see education and knowledge as a way to self improve. Now we are seen by some as smug liberals......  
    • Kwik Fit buggered up an A/C leak diagnosis for me (saying there wasn't one, when there was) and sold a regas. The vehicle had to be taken to an A/C specialist for condensor replacement and a further regas. Not impressed.
    • Yes, these are all good points. I agree with you, that division has led us down dangerous paths in the past. And I deplore any kind of racism (as I think you probably know).  But I feel that a lot of the current wave of xenophobia we're witnessing is actually more about a general malaise and discontent. I know non-white people around here who are surprisingly vocal about immigrants - legal or otherwise. I think this feeling transcends skin colour for a lot of people and isn't as simple as, say, the Jew hatred of the 1930s or the Irish and Black racism that we saw laterally. I think people feel ignored and looked down upon.  What you don't realise, Sephiroth, is that I actually agree with a lot of what you're saying. I just think that looking down on people because of their voting history and opinions is self-defeating. And that's where Labour's getting it wrong and Reform is reaping the rewards.   
    • @Sephiroth you made some interesting points on the economy, on the Lammy thread. Thought it worth broadening the discussion. Reeves (irrespective of her financial competence) clearly was too downbeat on things when Labour came into power. But could there have been more honesty on the liklihood of taxes going up (which they have done, and will do in any case due to the freezing of personal allowances).  It may have been a silly commitment not to do this, but were you damned if you do and damned if you don't?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...