Jump to content

To the woman in a brown coat and black trousers walking two dogs on Underhill at 2.15pm today

fortified

By fortified
in General ED Issues / Gossip

 Share

Recommended Posts

KidKruger

KidKruger

Posted
Posted

If your dog shits outside your home, bag it and find somewhere to safely/sensibly dispose of the bag.

Convenience doesn't come in to it FFS.

Nor 'the law'.


Weather baing cold as it has been lately you'd think dog owners would appreciate the free hand warmer that a nice hot shit in a bag inevitably can be. No vision, these dog walkery people.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

At no point did I suggest it was ok not to bin the mess. However, you do not know or appreciate this individuals circumstances, and if confronted they may have apologised and held their hands up. She had the common courtesy to bag it, she just forgot to bin it, so suggesting she is in the wrong is totally ludicrous. I don't see the point in bagging it if you're not gonna bin it, so she must have had good reason, that's all I'm saying. Some people clearly have nothing better to do than stare out the window shaking their heads and not confronting the problem head on.


I'd much rather confront a bagged turd on the kerb than a couple of posho mothers blocking the street with their prams whilst holding Nero/Starbucks take out coffees. Call me old fashioned.


Louisa.

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted
Holding a coffee in public is unarguably disgraceful. I am with you there 100%. No one in their right mind would suggest that dumping a bag o shit in the street is on the same level as brazen drink holding.
Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted
OMG!!! I just re-read your post Louisa, I missed the bit about having a baby...In a pram! A PRAM! Lazy, entitled, bloody 1 year olds. Fecking poshos, with their babies and DRINKS! I bet they do their poos in a TOILET! Probably even flush their decadent, bourgeois stools. Bastards.
Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

rahrahrah yes I agree with you here. Public coffee consumption is a relatively recent phenomenon which is unquestionably patronising and often done by a certain demographic, probably to make the rest of us enviable of where they choose to buy their latte from (usually one or two certain chains locally). I've made my objections for the public consumption of food very clear in the past on this forum and that still stands. Particularly in a confined public arena.


Louisa.

Earl Aelfheah

Earl Aelfheah

Posted
Posted
Agreed. The patronising consumption of liquids makes my want to puke... In a plastic bag, which I then hurl into the street... of course. Not a bin, like some lefty, pinko, fascist from The seventh circle of Clapham.
Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

Oh for goodness sakes. Just because one person can't find a bin on one ocassion (for all we know), she is vilified and condemned on a public forum totally unnecessarily which I find rather distasteful to be frank. Disgraceful behaviour, this poor woman even bagged the offending turd but no, not on the EDF, we can't let that one go can we? But when it comes to posh mothers owning walkways not a mention. Bang out of line.


Louisa.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

rahrahrah I thought we were on the same page for once then the miss marple in me picked up on the dubious one liners contained within that codified response about pink lefty fascists from Clapham and I realised it was all a rouse to drag me kicking and screaming into a false sense of security.


Louisa.

prunellabutterworth

prunellabutterworth

Posted
Posted

Unfortunately a few dog owners are lazy and just dump their dogs excrement anywhere, worse still, they allow their dogs to excrement wherever and never pick it up!


One should really have confronted the dog owner in question and reprimanded them.

fortified

fortified

Posted
  • Author
Posted

DaveR, that was too funny. I laughed so loud I woke the ba... Oh, never mind.



Back on topic (sort of) littering is a criminal offence, is it not? So this woman with her plastic-wrapped faecal matter was, at the very least, committing shittering.



To be honest, I'm gutted to have been dissed by Louisa, particularly where I'd have bet money she'd agree with me. Contrary is right.

Louisa

Louisa

Posted
Posted

Bring on the bagged turds. I'm used to dealing with sh1t on this forum so a bag of shit can be dealt with eyes closed and head held high.


Fortified i am rarely contrary, I just prefer to bring people to justice for the right reasons and not the wrong ones. Blocking pavements and ramming bystanders into the road is offensive. The dumping of bagged crap by a pensioner is hardly a crime wave in progress, this poor defenceless lady was just struggling to find a bin.


I'm on the merlot tonight so anything could happen.


Louisa.

robbin

robbin

Posted
Posted

She's a teenager - trolling from her bedroom.


Get to school Louisa!


Btw what is the "rouse" you mentioned - not come across that term before (in that context). Maybe if you spent more time in school, your spelling might improve?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      It’s a 4 year old on a bike do you really think he is going 15mph. Grown adults complaining about a child who probably isn’t able to string a few sentences together says a lot about the people in this forum. If this member was hit from behind the father was probably walking behind the bike so I don’t get the point of stretching out an overreaction from a child in Nursery bumping into you. Grow up Obviously a four year old should be cycling on the pavement.
    • Sue
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Sue · Posted

      Malumbu,  if none of us were there, does that mean that nobody should post anything on here unless they have witnesses from the EDF? Why would someone post something like this if it  wasn't true? This is not about whether children should or should not be cycling on the pavement. There are specific issues. a) the child was out of sight of the person supposed to be caring for him b) he appears to have been  either not looking where he was going or was out of control of the bike c) if he did see that he was about to hit someone  he apparently did not give them any kind of warning  d)  a person was unexpectedly hit from behind whilst just walking along, which in my view makes him a victim e) does the title of the thread really matter as the issue was described in the first post?  f) nobody is blaming the child, they are blaming the person who should have been watching him g) do you really think it was acceptable for that person to find the situation funny? The OP was not complaining about the 4 year old. They were complaining about an adult's lack of supervision of a 4 year old who was not capable of riding a bike and who hit someone from behind with no warning. Also, apart from reading the OP more carefully, perhaps also choose your words more carefully. Jobless? Lunatic? Charming.
    • Dave 3
      Be careful on the pavements...

      By Dave 3 · Posted

      Completely jobless and lunatic behaviour coming on a forum and complaining about a 4 year old and the child’s bike riding skills. Honestly grow up
    • Loutwo
      Franklins is being sold

      By Loutwo · Posted

      I have to say, I too am upset about the passing of DulwichFox. He was a real local character, who unlike me, managed to stick with ED despite all of the nauseous yuppification of the last three decades. R.I.P to foxy    Louisa. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...