Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Had an argument tonight with the bar staff at the Rose pub close to Vauxhall Bridge. Nay my good barman, you have keyed in a pint rather than a half. No dear sur, this really is ?9.80 a pint. "You should have consulted the menu and you would have seen this" It was for a blonde beer on tap. My regular readers will understand that I don't go for all this new-fangled beer but even some of the 'craft' (whatever that means) beer sold at your trendy places wont reach these prices. I left without paying, telling them by law they had to have prices prominantly displayed. Sadly I found out that these regs have been watered down so no moaning to Southwark Trading Standards for me.


Can anyone beat ?9.80 for a beer on tap? I think that you pay these sort of prices in basement bars in Soho, but a hostess (or host) is usually thrown in. In the UK please, although even in Norway I imagine that you would be pushed to pay so much.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/54342-most-expensive-pint-ever/
Share on other sites

Yes - at The Cask in Pimlico, Tap East at Stratford and a few others that sell craft beers, I've seen beers at over ?12 a pint. They tend to be really high ABV brews so are intended to be drunk in 1/3s or 1/2s. The bar staff are generally pretty good at advising pre-pouring though. The opposite also tends to be true though - that lighter session beers tend to be cheaper.

Never paid that much, but I think I was charged around ?7 for a pint of normal strength pale ale type stuff at The Rake. And a similar amount for a limited edition Sierra Nevada beer at the Flying Pig.


Always happy to pay a little bit extra for a nice craft beer or belgian beer, but once you get to ?6ish, I start to wonder whether I'd still be enjoying myself just as much with a pint of something cheaper in my hand.

Re. David_carnel


1 Imperial pint = 568.261485 millilitres


1 millilitre = 0.00175975326 Imperial pints


330mL = 0.58 pints


0.58 pint = 6.00


58 = 600


1 Pint = ?10.34


Cheaper than ?14.00 but still expensive...


I think the Draft House had beers dearer than that...


DulwichFox

The term "Craft beer" makes me want to hit something.


Nothing against the actual products, just the name.


I wouldn't spend over ?6 on a pint, and if I did spend ?6 I'd expect that pint to be pretty bloody special.


Beer revolution is cheaper than your average pub, and their beers are great. It's about honest pricing.

The good stuff doesn't have to be expensive... Late Knights/Beer Rebellion is not expensive, Stormbird in Camberwell has reasonable prices, as does The Ivy House. I can see why the imported American beers could work out expensive, but surely regular strength domestic beers shouldn't really be over ?5 a pint.

This from Late Knights most recent blog (which was written new years eve)


"The next pub we will be doing is the Alexandra in Penge. We get lots of people begging us for news about this pub, and the repeated line from us has always been 'we are waiting for planning permission to come through' That is the case.


Hopefully is we get it granted in early Jan we will be 3 months away from opening. There is a lot of work to do here and we are silly excited by it. We will be doing lots of amazing food and selling bucket loads of our own beer, it really will be a Penge pub for a Penge brewery!"




Make it so!!!

@jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are not careful! These days they tend to tell you if it's going to make your eyes water before they start pouring.


I bought my most expensive beer ever at the weekend, the Horizon Tokyo Black. ?16 for a 25cl bottle. Best imperial russian stout I've ever had though, possibly the best beer. That works out at ?48 for a wine bottle size!

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Re. David_carnel

>

> 1 Imperial pint = 568.261485 millilitres

>

> 1 millilitre = 0.00175975326 Imperial pints

>

> 330mL = 0.58 pints

>

> 0.58 pint = 6.00

>

> 58 = 600

>

> 1 Pint = ?10.34

>

> Cheaper than ?14.00 but still expensive...

>

> I think the Draft House had beers dearer than

> that...

>

> DulwichFox


Yeah....thanks for that.

rodneybewes Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> @jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are not careful!


Afterwards had a couple of pints of cask ale... an Oakham and a Thornbridge I think... for a very reasonable price, so it balanced out. But.... I just prefer keg beer. Don't know why it seems to be so much more expensive.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rodneybewes Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > @jeremy The Rake can catch you out if you are

> not careful!

>

> Afterwards had a couple of pints of cask ale... an

> Oakham and a Thornbridge I think... for a very

> reasonable price, so it balanced out. But.... I

> just prefer keg beer. Don't know why it seems to

> be so much more expensive.



Agreed. That's the joy of The Rake. You can admire the super-beers from around the world but you always have a reasonably priced session ale to fall back on.

I understand that there can be a premium on beer, wine or any commodity. Or that upmarket placers charge more


On the odd occasion the Rake expecting to be shafted I am pleasantly surprised that the have a reasonably priced ale on.


In my pub we have that fizzy cold nonsense that the hipsters drink but we have the prices properly displayed, I have told the management we have too many beers on.


I was just stunned that a 'normal' looking tap would have such a high price tag. Anyway some good postings

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • While it is good that GALA have withdrawn their application for a second weekend, local people and councillors will likely have the same fight on their hands for next year's event. In reading the consultation report, I noted the Council were putting the GALA event in the same light as all the other events that use the park, like the Circus, the Fair and even the FOPR fete. ALL of those events use the common, not the park, and cause nothing like the level of noise and/or disruption of the GALA event. Even the two day Irish Festival (for those that remember that one) was never as noisy as GALA. So there is some disingenuity and hypocrisy from the Council on this, something I wll point out in my response to the report. The other point to note was that in past years branches were cut back for the fencing. Last year the council promised no trees would be cut after pushback, but they seem to now be reverting to a position of 'only in agreement with the council's arbourist'. Is this more hypocrisy from 'green' Southwark who seem to once again be ok with defacing trees for a fence that is up for just days? The people who now own GALA don't live in this area. GALA as an event began in Brockwell Park. It then lost its place there to bigger events (that pesumably could pay Lambeth Council more). One of the then company directors lived on the Rye Hill Estate next to the park and that is likely how Peckham Rye came to be the new choice for the event. That person is no longer involved. Today's GALA company is not the same as the 'We Are the Fair' company that held that first event, not the same in scope, aim or culture. And therein lies the problem. It's not a local community led enterprise, but a commercial one, underwritten by a venture capital company. The same company co-run the Rally Event each year in Southwark Park, which btw is licensed as a one day event only. That does seem to be truer to the original 'We Are the Fair' vision, but how much of that is down to GALA as opoosed to 'Bird on the Wire' (the other group organising it) is hard to say.  For local people, it's three days of not being able to open windows, As someone said above, if a resident set up a PA in their back garden and subjected the neighbours to 10 hours of hard dance music every day for three days, the Council would take action. Do not underestimate how distressing that is for many local residents, many of whom are elderly, frail, young, vulnerable. They deserve more respect than is being shown by those who think it's no big deal. And just to be clear, GALA and the council do not consider there to be a breach of db level if the level is corrected within 15 minutes of the breach. In other words, while db levels are set as part of the noise management plan, there is an acknowledgement that a breach is ok if corrected within 15 minutes. That is just not good enough. Local councillors objected to the proposed extension. 75% of those that responded to the consultation locally did not want GALA 26 to take place at all. For me personally, any goodwill that had been built up through the various consultations over recent years was erased with that application for a second weekend, and especially given that when asked if there were plans for that in post 2025 event feedback meetings (following rumours), GALA lied and said there were no plans to expand. I have come to the conclusion that all the effort to appease on some things is merely an exercise in show, to get past the council's threshold for the events licence. They couldn't give a hoot in reality for local people, and people that genuinely care about parkland, don't litter it with noisy festivals either.   
    • Aria is my go to plumber. Fixed a toilet leak for me at short notice. Reasonably priced and very professional. 
    • Anyone has a storage or a display rack for Albums LPs drop me a message thanks
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...