Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh it's not for me! My sister is moving house and wants to live in Cheam because it's easy access to her work in Guildford, but she doesnt want to move too far out of London. I drove via Streatham, Mitcham, Sutton (ish) to get there and only saw houses and no shops. Wondered if anyone had info on shops, public transport etc


Louisa.

If that's the house you went to see with your sister, then I'd be a "no" if you are canvassing local opinion. She could do better, even if she is a more easy going person than you Louisa, she would get stressed with all the customers, and the late night drop box would keep her awake, for sure.

Ok. Relax people. Help is at hand.


I was born and grew up in cheam till I moved to ED aged 25 so, for possibly the first timeever on the forum, I can speak with knowledge and authority.


Cheam is divided into two. Cheam Village based around a cross roads is quite pleasant. Decent, varied housing stock and some good shops. It lacks any real high quality restaurants but has pizza express and other generic Italian, Chinese and thai joints. The truly beautiful and enormous nonsuch park is on your doorstep. Decent pubs.


North Cheam (where your picture is of) is much more down market. Housing tends to be 1930s identikit. Shops are more generic cheap and cheerful. The place is blighted by a giant sainsburys and the victoria house office block due to be pulled down but currently derelict along with the units underneath. Grim pubs.


If schools are a consideration then Sutton is one of the remaining boroughs with grammars and some of the comps are decent.


Transport links are pretty good with Sutton station being a fairly good hub and west Sutton or cheam also nearby but smaller.


In general it's all very daily mail country. White flight to the suburbs and not the friendliest of places. But in pockets some of the area is very nice. Do you know what roads your sister is looking at louisa?


As a comparison it has the same changes of demographic and environment that you would experience between Dulwich village, nunhead, east Dulwich and bits of Peckham in a similar sized area. It's hard to be more exact.


Hope that helps.

david_carnell, that is extremely helpful, she will be glad to know i've researched it for her as it is a place I had never been to before and I knew little or nothing of it. Apparantly Worcester Park has an M&S? Not sure how true that is.


The property we viewed was on Salisbury Avenue, and although I was not keen she loved it and is persuing it so good luck to her. I saw a park which did look rather nice on route, and I get what you mean about the whole 1930's everything is the same architecture.


Louisa.

Salisbury avenue? Ah, so she's just off the bypassbut very close to cheam village and the station. I don't know the road but it's a handy location and in the "right bit" of cheam.


In terms of other shops in that bit, off the top of my head, there's a butcher, baker, greengrocer, offie, whsmiths, boots, and then the usual odds and sods.


What sort of stuff does she want or need? If you or her have any queries drop me a PM.


Hope she's happy there.


David.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's in Surrey, and Surrey just edges out

> Hertfordshire as being the most boring of the home

> counties (which is saying something)


You know Ware (in Herts) was once known for having the most number of pubs in a square mile...


Louisa - I spoke to a very strange man at work yesterday who travelled in from Cheam for the day. DON'T LET YOUR SISTER DO IT!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony my love u get on a train at sevensisters

> heading towards Hertford East... :p


Fair enough but I did almost wonder Ware it was....


p.s ...and if you don't get my lil joke the second time, I'm never gonna call you "Kelstar" again Babes:))

Got it the first time round mister.


Funny, the dude at the train station thought I didnt get it too... several times round and couldn't understand why I werent getting a return "where ya going and y aint u coming back from where ever it is you're going?" Terrible chat up line...

I grew up near Cheam and went to school in Sutton so know it pretty well. It's a pretty good place to live if you like suburbia. Really nice pub called the Red Lion which is tucked away up a side street, OK high street, goodish choice of restaurants, good transport links, good schools, typical suburbia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
    • Yes, all this. Totally Sephiroth. The electorate wants to see transformation overnight. That's not possible. But what is possible is leading with the right comms strategy, which isn't cutting through. As I've said before, messaging matters more now than policy, that's the only way to bring the electorate with you. And I worry that that's how Reform's going to get into power.  And the media LOVES Reform. 
    • “There was an excellent discussion on Newscast last night between the BBC Political Editor, the director of the IFS and the director of More In Common - all highly intelligent people with no party political agenda ” I would call this “generous”   Labour should never have made that tax promise because, as with - duh - Brexit, it’s pretending the real world doesn’t exist now. I blame Labour in no small part for this delusion. But the electorate need to cop on as well.  They think they can have everything they want without responsibilities, costs or attachments. The media encourage this  Labour do need to raise taxes. The country needs it.  Now, exactly how it’s done remains to be seen. But if people are just going to go around going “la la laffer curve. Liars! String em up! Vote someone else” then they just aren’t serious people reckoning with the problem yes Labour are more than a year into their term, but after 14 years of what the Tories  did? Whoever takes over, has a major problem 
    • Messaging, messaging, messaging. That's all it boils down to. There are only so many fiscal policies out there, and they're there for the taking, no matter which party you're in. I hate to say it, but Farage gets it right every time. Even when Reform reneges on fiscal policy, it does it with enough confidence and candidness that no one is wringing their hands. Instead, they're quietly admired for their pragmatism. Strangely, it's exactly the same as Labour has done, with its manifesto reverse on income tax, but it's going to bomb.  Blaming the Tories / Brexit / Covid / Putin ... none of it washes with the public anymore  - it wants to be sold a vision of the future, not reminded of the disasters of the past. Labour put itself on the back foot with its 'the tories fucked it all up' stance right at the beginning of its tenure.  All Lammy had to do (as with Reeves and Raynor etc) was say 'mea culpa. We've made a mistake, we'll fix it. Sorry guys, we're on it'. But instead it's 'nothing to see here / it's someone else's fault / I was buying a suit / hadn't been briefed yet'.  And, of course, the press smells blood, which never helps.  Oh! And Reeve's speech on Wednesday was so drab and predictable that even the journalists at the press conference couldn't really be arsed to come up with any challenging questions. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...