Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Oh it's not for me! My sister is moving house and wants to live in Cheam because it's easy access to her work in Guildford, but she doesnt want to move too far out of London. I drove via Streatham, Mitcham, Sutton (ish) to get there and only saw houses and no shops. Wondered if anyone had info on shops, public transport etc


Louisa.

If that's the house you went to see with your sister, then I'd be a "no" if you are canvassing local opinion. She could do better, even if she is a more easy going person than you Louisa, she would get stressed with all the customers, and the late night drop box would keep her awake, for sure.

Ok. Relax people. Help is at hand.


I was born and grew up in cheam till I moved to ED aged 25 so, for possibly the first timeever on the forum, I can speak with knowledge and authority.


Cheam is divided into two. Cheam Village based around a cross roads is quite pleasant. Decent, varied housing stock and some good shops. It lacks any real high quality restaurants but has pizza express and other generic Italian, Chinese and thai joints. The truly beautiful and enormous nonsuch park is on your doorstep. Decent pubs.


North Cheam (where your picture is of) is much more down market. Housing tends to be 1930s identikit. Shops are more generic cheap and cheerful. The place is blighted by a giant sainsburys and the victoria house office block due to be pulled down but currently derelict along with the units underneath. Grim pubs.


If schools are a consideration then Sutton is one of the remaining boroughs with grammars and some of the comps are decent.


Transport links are pretty good with Sutton station being a fairly good hub and west Sutton or cheam also nearby but smaller.


In general it's all very daily mail country. White flight to the suburbs and not the friendliest of places. But in pockets some of the area is very nice. Do you know what roads your sister is looking at louisa?


As a comparison it has the same changes of demographic and environment that you would experience between Dulwich village, nunhead, east Dulwich and bits of Peckham in a similar sized area. It's hard to be more exact.


Hope that helps.

david_carnell, that is extremely helpful, she will be glad to know i've researched it for her as it is a place I had never been to before and I knew little or nothing of it. Apparantly Worcester Park has an M&S? Not sure how true that is.


The property we viewed was on Salisbury Avenue, and although I was not keen she loved it and is persuing it so good luck to her. I saw a park which did look rather nice on route, and I get what you mean about the whole 1930's everything is the same architecture.


Louisa.

Salisbury avenue? Ah, so she's just off the bypassbut very close to cheam village and the station. I don't know the road but it's a handy location and in the "right bit" of cheam.


In terms of other shops in that bit, off the top of my head, there's a butcher, baker, greengrocer, offie, whsmiths, boots, and then the usual odds and sods.


What sort of stuff does she want or need? If you or her have any queries drop me a PM.


Hope she's happy there.


David.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> It's in Surrey, and Surrey just edges out

> Hertfordshire as being the most boring of the home

> counties (which is saying something)


You know Ware (in Herts) was once known for having the most number of pubs in a square mile...


Louisa - I spoke to a very strange man at work yesterday who travelled in from Cheam for the day. DON'T LET YOUR SISTER DO IT!

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Tony my love u get on a train at sevensisters

> heading towards Hertford East... :p


Fair enough but I did almost wonder Ware it was....


p.s ...and if you don't get my lil joke the second time, I'm never gonna call you "Kelstar" again Babes:))

Got it the first time round mister.


Funny, the dude at the train station thought I didnt get it too... several times round and couldn't understand why I werent getting a return "where ya going and y aint u coming back from where ever it is you're going?" Terrible chat up line...

I grew up near Cheam and went to school in Sutton so know it pretty well. It's a pretty good place to live if you like suburbia. Really nice pub called the Red Lion which is tucked away up a side street, OK high street, goodish choice of restaurants, good transport links, good schools, typical suburbia.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do none of you go abroad.  Tourist taxes are really common in continental Europe and do vary a lot city by city. They are collected by the hotels/rental apartments. They are usually a  tiny part of your holiday costs.  In Narbonne recently we paid €1.30 per person per night.  The next town we went to charge 80 cents per person per night. By comparison Cologne is 5% of your accomodation.
    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...