Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Mikecg Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> You see *Bob* the things you describe are the

> things I love about this place, it's a playground

> on many levels, and lots of the longterm posters

> are as guilty as the newcomers.



But Mike, you don't understand. This used to be a receptacle of serious debate. The key issues of the day were put to the sword - the sword of truth. Men listened, argued and then shook hands - whilst women looked-on and swooned. And now? Now it's nothing but the gutter-talk of the masses. It used to be Question Time with a Pinot Noir. Now it's Yates's Wine Lodge with a rum and Coke.

Tony.London Suburbs Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> ???? Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > I am *bob*...if we go there quickly we can start

> a

> > clique

>

> Do you wanna join my gang Quids? (it can be your

> gang if you want, I'm easy either way)..


Didn't want a bleedin' Hammer in my clique anywayz, I was just being civil..


Invitation Withdrawn..:X

For the record Annaj I never thought you were one of those complaining but recently admin made clear one specific reason for complaints against my postings and I agree with their upset. Concerning your 'pub' I fear and suspect I was one of the posters that drove you away. Looking through the opinions of my posts I suppose my critisizing of 'knee jerk' complaining is actually hypocritical since my reactions to intellectually superior responses to my posts can be as Mikecg put it a 'right hook followed by an upper cut' which in all honesty reflects my intellectual inadequacies. However when I'm cornered I bite back viciously so I condone upset in this circumstance.


For those of you who think I've gone soft concerning my last post to Annaj, BEHAVE!

I'm glad someone brought up the quiet room earlier, as that was going to be my point. Started very funny, if a bit surreal. Then just turned in to a really odd little flirt between a couple of forumites, and became a thread I just stopped clicking on. Things role on, maybe some have had their time, deal with it.

Sorry, been asleep all day.

Mike, I can honestly say I've never been ridiculed on this forum. I explained why I'd edited, because I always do, because when I see an edit in someone else's post I always wonder why.


BBW, interesting post. Don't worry, as I tried to say earlier I don't consider myself to have been driven away, more drifting.


As far as cliquey-ness goes, I'm probably guilty sometimes of what Rosie is talking about. I don't think I get into cycles of praise or insults, but I do make references to things that have happened out in the real world when posting, which I can see might seem cliquey. But on the other hand, when I first joined it was exactly that sort of thing in other peoples' post that appealed to me, because it made me think these aren't just people posting on the internet, these are people who have really met and socialised.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Do they require a direct debit?
    • There seems to be a change in the reception staff - did not recognise a couple of them when I last visited.  Not sure whether one of the long term staff has retired as not seen her for a while.  Used on line facility as my podiatrist recommended antibiotics for a toe infection and also took photo of my toe which I attached yo my request. Got a message back within a day to say medication ordered from chemist. 
    • Alternatively, here's the whole caboodle. Reference    25/AP/1351 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new ATM with associated security camera and light. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference    25/AP/1352 Application Received    Wed 07 May 2025 Application Validated    Wed 14 May 2025 Address    29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Proposal    Installation of a new louvre. Status    Granted Decision    Minor - GRANTED Decision Issued Date    Fri 13 Jun 2025 Reference   25/AP/1353 Display of 1 no. new non-illuminated box fascia with vinyl lettering, 1 no. new box fascia with internally illuminated acrylic lettering, 2 no. new non-illuminated box fascia, 2 no. new internally illuminated projecting signs and 1 no. new vinyl to be applied around ATM. 29 - 35 Lordship Lane London Southwark SE22 8EW Advertisement Consent-GRANTED  Decided Mon 07 Jul 2025 The only Lordship Lane item I could find as granted in w/b 13 October was to do with replacement of Dulwich Library's heating system by an air heat pump. 
    • Oh give it a break.  We have an MP who makes racist comments, yet our media (and what seems like this Forum) that generally hate Labour (and loved Johnson) are just out looking for the dirt. It's a move on, nothing to see here.  Particularly if she used a letting agency.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...