Jump to content

Recommended Posts

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Yes, effectively forcing people to live their

> lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and

> adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such a

> plus point innit - those papal coffers dont fill

> themselves you know.

>

> Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another

> slur on a noble institution as well

>

> And I wont even make any reference to the Lateran

> pact, cos that will invoke that law about calling

> someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think

> instantly devalues whatever point you may have

> made

>

> And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure

>

>

> OTT ?


but the story isn't about any of the above and i thought that the thread was


i don't know about forcing a billion people to do what they don't want to, i don't know about all these stories that people tell about covering up paedophilia, or about the lateran pact (you didn't do well there in relation to not making a reference, by making a reference) - i really don't so i'm not commenting on them - can you share any FACTS about these? and about the pope being a nazi?

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snorky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Yes, effectively forcing people to live their

> > lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and

> > adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such

> a

> > plus point innit - those papal coffers dont

> fill

> > themselves you know.

> >

> > Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another

> > slur on a noble institution as well

> >

> > And I wont even make any reference to the

> Lateran

> > pact, cos that will invoke that law about

> calling

> > someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think

> > instantly devalues whatever point you may have

> > made

> >

> > And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure

> >

> >

> > OTT ?

>

> but the story isn't about any of the above and i

> thought that the thread was

>

> i don't know about forcing a billion people to do

> what they don't want to, i don't know about all

> these stories that people tell about covering up

> paedophilia, or about the lateran pact (you didn't

> do well there in relation to not making a

> reference, by making a reference) - i really don't

> so i'm not commenting on them - can you share any

> FACTS about these? and about the pope being a

> nazi?


Hitler Jugend innit -his views on the position of women and Gays are not exactly 21st - or even 20th - century


Odd isnt it , how a legion of ( officially ) celibate males are deemed to be so utterly sage like, they can force their antideuvial opinions on something they have no experience of, onto others.


I would hardly go and consult a vegan for advice on the best cuts of meat at William Rose, yet the catholic church is deemed an acceptable opinion on sexuality and its issues.


*puts Crass bullshit detector on the turntable*

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm inclined to agree pk.

>

> It's not unlike Jehova's witnesses who'd rather

> die than have a blood transfusion.

>

> Religious rules aren't there to be broken by

> pathetic little things like compassion, humanity

> or logic, they are hard and fast things that

> result in heaven or hell.

>

> Seen from that point of view it's we heathens who

> are stupid and doomed, and the archibishop who's

> trying to prevent more souls condemned to hell in

> future.

>

> Can't have your cake and eat it you know.

>

> Mind you @#$%& stupid @#$%&!!!!!!



(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • that is one cliche-ridden post headnun    it doesn’t mean a sack of beans in the real world  “old fashioned voters” meaning the ones dragging the country down this last 15 years just to laugh at the libs tears. Well done all  I’m not looking back at all. This is not a post Europe world in any sense. There are forces bigger than Europe but uk would be better aligning with Europe against, say, china, the pretending we live in some post Europe world.    and in case you hadn’t noticed, whoever you vote for, there are a LOT of ignorant racists feeling very happy with their resurgence - I would fight against them if I were you 
    • No they aren't. You're coming across as a smug, superior liberal, and that's what old fashioned voters (labour, Cons and now Reform) hate. That 'the deplorables' 'they're all ignorant racists' line is what's driving people away from the traditional parties and towards Reform.  You're as guilty of looking back as Labour. This is a new, post-europe world and we all need to come to terms with that, make do with what we have, and move forward.       
    • I have sympathy with any voter, anyone, who having witnessed the last 14 years and then Labour in the last year and wonders just how can things be this bad  unless a) they voted for brexit b) voted Tory after 2010 c) is thinking of voting reform  because anyone who thinks reform won’t make things a thousand times worse after voting for the previous?  It is they who are the problem.  They are the reason the country is in the doldrums with an embarrassingly-timid Labour government  Specifically Chris mason - a not very bright right leaning stooge - large part of why bbc news has become grok-level slop  
    • In what way? Maybe it just felt more intelligent and considered coming directly after Question Time, which was a barely watchable bun fight.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...