Jump to content

Recommended Posts

snorky Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> Yes, effectively forcing people to live their

> lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and

> adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such a

> plus point innit - those papal coffers dont fill

> themselves you know.

>

> Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another

> slur on a noble institution as well

>

> And I wont even make any reference to the Lateran

> pact, cos that will invoke that law about calling

> someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think

> instantly devalues whatever point you may have

> made

>

> And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure

>

>

> OTT ?


but the story isn't about any of the above and i thought that the thread was


i don't know about forcing a billion people to do what they don't want to, i don't know about all these stories that people tell about covering up paedophilia, or about the lateran pact (you didn't do well there in relation to not making a reference, by making a reference) - i really don't so i'm not commenting on them - can you share any FACTS about these? and about the pope being a nazi?

pk Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> snorky Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> >

> > Yes, effectively forcing people to live their

> > lives in abject fear of God and the chuch, and

> > adhering to a dark ages outlook on life is such

> a

> > plus point innit - those papal coffers dont

> fill

> > themselves you know.

> >

> > Hushing up sex abuse cases is probabaly another

> > slur on a noble institution as well

> >

> > And I wont even make any reference to the

> Lateran

> > pact, cos that will invoke that law about

> calling

> > someone a Nazi that some deluded fools think

> > instantly devalues whatever point you may have

> > made

> >

> > And El papa isnt an ex Nazi either Im sure

> >

> >

> > OTT ?

>

> but the story isn't about any of the above and i

> thought that the thread was

>

> i don't know about forcing a billion people to do

> what they don't want to, i don't know about all

> these stories that people tell about covering up

> paedophilia, or about the lateran pact (you didn't

> do well there in relation to not making a

> reference, by making a reference) - i really don't

> so i'm not commenting on them - can you share any

> FACTS about these? and about the pope being a

> nazi?


Hitler Jugend innit -his views on the position of women and Gays are not exactly 21st - or even 20th - century


Odd isnt it , how a legion of ( officially ) celibate males are deemed to be so utterly sage like, they can force their antideuvial opinions on something they have no experience of, onto others.


I would hardly go and consult a vegan for advice on the best cuts of meat at William Rose, yet the catholic church is deemed an acceptable opinion on sexuality and its issues.


*puts Crass bullshit detector on the turntable*

mockney piers Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm inclined to agree pk.

>

> It's not unlike Jehova's witnesses who'd rather

> die than have a blood transfusion.

>

> Religious rules aren't there to be broken by

> pathetic little things like compassion, humanity

> or logic, they are hard and fast things that

> result in heaven or hell.

>

> Seen from that point of view it's we heathens who

> are stupid and doomed, and the archibishop who's

> trying to prevent more souls condemned to hell in

> future.

>

> Can't have your cake and eat it you know.

>

> Mind you @#$%& stupid @#$%&!!!!!!



(tu)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Morally they should, but we don't actually vote for parties in our electoral system. We vote for a parliamentary (or council) representative. That candidates group together under party unbrellas is irrelevant. We have a 'representative' democracy, not a party political one (if that makes sense). That's where I am on things at the moment. Reform are knocking on the door of the BNP, and using wedge issues to bait emotional rage. The Greens are knocking on the door of the hard left, sweeping up the Corbynista idealists. But it's worth saying that both are only ascending because of the failures of the two main parties and the successive governments they have led. Large parts of the country have been left in economic decline for decades, while city fat cats became uber wealthy. Young people have been screwed over by student loans. Housing is 40 years of commoditisation, removing affordabilty beyond the reach of too many. Decently paid, secure jobs, seem to be a thing of the past. Which of the main parties can people turn to, to fix any of these things, when the main parties are the reason for the mess that has been allowed to evolve? Reform certainly aren't the answer to those things. The Greens may aspire to do something meaningful about some of them, but where will they find the money to pay for it? None of it's easy.
    • Yes, but the context is important and the reason.
    • That messes up Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland - democracy being based on citizenship not literacy. There's intentionally no one language that campaign materials have to be in. 
    • TBH if people don't see what is sectarian in the materials linked to above when they read about them, then I don't think me going on about it will help. They speak for themselves.  I don't know how the Greens can justify promising to be a strong voice for one particular religion. Will that pledge hold when it comes to campaigning in East Dulwich (which is majority atheist)? https://censusdata.uk/e02000836-east-dulwich/ts030-religion
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...