Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Sillywoman, for information, those scholarships were funded by the old ILEA, and they ceased in 1970 when that authority (which ran all the schools in the inner London boroughs) decided not to pay for places at non-state schools.

There were at least 30 of those free places in any one year I think.

Similarly, others could attend the school (until the direct grant was abolished in 1976) and only needed to pay what they could afford, based on their parents' incomes/outgoings. This covered the rest of the pupils in any one year. So the "only" thing that applicants had to do was to pass the entrance exam. If their income was low, they'd pay no fees at all. The government funded these costs by the direct grant.

After these free places ceased, the school had little choice but to go Independent from 1976.

As far as I am aware, Alleyn's had no desire to become a fully fee-paying school. It was forced to do this effectively by the Labour government in 1976. That was when the school also decided to become co-educational, which has made it today probably the top fully co-ed school in the country. Quite a credit to good old ED really!

Sillywoman, your snide comment reminds me why I rarely read or post on this forum.


My boyfriend was born in 1976 and went to Alleyn's in the early 90s, long after any local ILEA scholarships ceased as the previous poster has noted. He stayed friends with around ten of his classmates there, many still live in the area and in fact he's working on projects with two of them at the moment.


Everyone's experiences are different, and I meant to strike a note of positivity here. Your negative echoing/mocking of my comment is not appreciated.


Signing off, sayonara forum.

sillywoman Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> My husband born and bred in Camberwell was given a

> scholarship to Alleyns on academic merit and says

> it was pretty horrible always being the poor boy.


Can your husband remember the school doing anything for East Dulwich when he was part of "The Experiment"?

>>JaneAusten asked: If the field opposite the school is under-used by both Alleyn's and local state schools, why isn't a corner of it turned into a coach park so they don't clog up Townley Road? Just a thought...


Southwark Planners wouldn't allow it as it's MOL Metropolitan Open Land.

Michael Croft, the person after whom the theatre is named was an extraordinary person whose theatrical work at Alleyns had impact well beyond the school


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Croft


Which is to say I can see exactly why the school felt that a really very good theatre named after him was a good idea. Would be good to see something of his spirit extended to its use however ...

Yes, you are right. A remarkable man:

"Even more vaguely, I hoped that the Youth Theatre, as I was already calling it in my mind, would develop a real sense of community by bringing together young people from diverse backgrounds to work in a group where even the humblest mattered. I hoped too that the work would encourage them to look upon the theatre as being as much part of their lives as football or dancing, instead of something reserved for the precious or privileged few."


And now part of his legacy is an eponymous theatre...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Link to petition if anyone would like to object: Londis Off-License Petition https://chng.it/9X4DwTDRdW
    • The lady is called Janet 
    • He did mention it's share of freehold, I’d be very cautious with that. It can turn into a nightmare if relationships with neighbours break down. My brother had a share of freehold in a flat in West Hampstead, and when he needed to sell, the neighbour refused to sign the transfer of the freehold. What followed was over two years of legal battles, spiralling costs and constant stress. He lost several potential buyers, and the whole sale fell through just as he got a job offer in another city. It was a complete disaster. The neighbour was stubborn and uncooperative, doing everything they could to delay the process. It ended in legal deadlock, and there was very little anyone could do without their cooperation. At that point, the TA6 form becomes the least of your worries; it’s the TR1 form that matters. Without the other freeholder’s signature on that, you’re stuck. After seeing what my brother went through, I’d never touch a share of freehold again. When things go wrong, they can go really wrong. If you have a share of freehold, you need a respectful and reasonable relationship with the others involved; otherwise, it can be costly, stressful and exhausting. Sounds like these neighbours can’t be reasoned with. There’s really no coming back from something like this unless they genuinely apologise and replace the trees and plants they ruined. One small consolation is that people who behave like this are usually miserable behind closed doors. If they were truly happy, they’d just get on with their lives instead of trying to make other people’s lives difficult. And the irony is, they’re being incredibly short-sighted. This kind of behaviour almost always backfires.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...