Jump to content

Recommended Posts

It's cheered me up that he's not presenting it any more.


I think if (IF) I sat and watched all (fifty-eight hours) of it and put a pound in a jar every time I genuinely laughed, a fiver would more than cover it.

Unfortunately I wouldn't get past the first three minutes. As soon as I hear a mention of an upcoming comedy 'spectacular' featuring the cast of Eastenders and BBC newsreaders I'll be off to put my head in the oven. And my oven's electric, so that's going to HURT.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't you find Lenny Henry funny, Bob?


He really is hilarious isn't he? That wonderful advert he is in for that hotel chain. I cry with laughter every time I see it - 'I've found something small time - THE BILL'. Unfortunately Lenny its your career that is small time now.

Also, there is the whole tricky issue of them withdrawing funding from good developing world sexual health charities that offer termination, among other services, under pressure from the catholic church and faith schools.


I'm never comfortable with charities that have religious affiliations, even less so with one that claims to be independent, but then bows to pressure.

I just see it as pointless.


Why not raise money to put a stop to foreign companies and governments exploiting Africa. And then send a few men with guns around to the various corrupt despots that pass for leadership on the continent and tell them to run their fucking countries properly and provide their people with the services they need.

I am just going to bury my head in the sand today and wait for Charities like "Help a London Child" (Capital Radio at Easter) or that ilk that I support


Good job that I am planning on staying in with a stack of DVD's and Jack (Bottle off) in an attempt to clear my head from the night before last.


Sad but true, I think I am actually getting Charity Fatigue now as there are so many rattling their tins at me (either in the street, on the radio or on TV) ::o

Sorry, can I just do a complete u-turn on my last post.

I've just checked with my sister, who works in sexual health and is up to date on all this stuff, and apparently now comic relief are funding charities that support contraception and termination, depsite the objections of the catholic church and faith schools. A few years ago they pulled funding from a few charities and offered catholic organisations a deal to guarantee that none of their money would go to causes they didn't agree with, but apprently now they've stopped all that and many catholic organisations are boycotting comic relief as a result.

Which, as far as I can see, is a good reason to support them!

I would much rather give money for someone to do nothing. Take off that silly wig, those ridiculous leggings, stop jogging round the park with a wheelbarrow or crazily pouring custard over your wacky best friend. You don't have to demean yourself. Just have an hoest whip round and I'll chip in.

I hate being made to feel guilty for not getting involved.

I am so glad I do not work for a big corporation where it was "expected" you join in.

You just know that any negative reaction will go on record somewhere and you'd be marked against it in the assessments.


I also cringe when I hear the Radio 4 presenters talk about having joined in - oh how funny that they did. You can tell they cringed too.


It's all too big and corporate. Should have all stopped after the first Live Aid in '84.

Whinge whinge

People give charity in different ways..."real charity is private"....what a load of cobblers.


If charity was not "public" there would be far less good work done in this world. If persons choose to raise money by acting a t1t and through media then so be it.


The Marathon is a road race but is in effect, a very public display of charity giving, by hundreds of thousands of people....there are thousands of these type of events each year and long may it continue.


personally I don't really like Comic relief and choose to give through DD's each month, but I wouldn't begrudge anyone who is involved or gives to the cause.....so yes sorry I think you are a curmudgeon :(

What did they 'do' last year? ?40m?


What if everyone promises to pledge double their usual amount tonight, on the condition that they skip the bloody thing next year? Or just put something - and not wishing to be contraversial here - put something funny on?


Now that would be a relief.


Because as it stands there are more laughs in The Deer Hunter.

I think Red Nose Day is every two years but yes it does seem to come round a lot sooner. At the end of the day it does raise a lot of money which can't be a bad thing. However I confess I am becoming somewhat of a curmudgeon myself when celebs like Lenny Henry suddenly take centre stage. I am also a little suspect about Robbie Williams . I suppose for the celebrities involved they might say. " I'm damned if I do and I'm damned if I don't." To answer the OP, yes it grates.

Yeah, I'm with Snorky, I think you're all a miserable bunch of b*****ds.


It's not on that often, you don't have to watch it, you're not obliged to bathe in baked beans, you don't have to donate AND you get to see red-caped crusaders riding on choppers through Peckham Rye. 40 million quid to good causes - what's not to love?


Frankly while I'm not a fan of general zaniness, and it might be the hangover I'm still nursing, but I'm finding the films rather emotional. Enough to tolerate the very bad suit the very delicious David Tennant was wearing. I'm unconvinced this money would be raised any other way - do people really buy lottery tickets as a way of giving to charity? I think moving them to donate through rubbish comedy and harrowing documentary footage gets the job done and as such is no bad thing.

Do any of you complainers give to any good cause, whether time or money? You don't have to watch comic relief, there's other channels on the telly box. If it helps anyone out of poverty or provides opportuniy, who cares if a minor celebrity gets a plug in return? You have the choice to give and the choice to watch.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Rant ahead: You're not one of them but unfortunately, there's a substrate of posters here that do very little except moan and come up with weird conspiracy theories. They're immediately highly critical of just about any change, and their initial assumption is that everyone else is a total fucking contemptible idiot. For example: don't you think that the people who run the libraries will have considered the impact of timing of reconstruction on library users? (In fact, we know they have - because they've made arrangements at other libraries to attempt to mitigate the disruption). After all, these are the people that spend their whole working week thinking about libraries and dealing with library users (and the kids especially). You don't go into the library game for the chicks and fame - so it's fair to assume that librarians are committed to public service and public access to libraries, including by kids. Likewise the built environment people (engineers, architects, construction managers, project managers, construction contractors, subcontractors or whoever is on this job) are told to minimise disruption on every job they do. The thing that occurs to us as amateurs within 30 seconds of us seeing something is probably not something a full time professional hasn't thought about! Southwark Council, the NHS, TfL, Dulwich Estate, Thames Water, Openreach - they're not SPECTRE factories filled with malevolent chaosmongers trying to persecute anyone. They're mostly filled with people who understand their job and try to do their best with what they've been given - just like all of us. Nobody is perfect or immune from challenge, and that's fair enough, but why not at least start from the assumption that there's a good reason why things have been done the way they have? Any normal person would be pleased that their busy, pretty, lively local library is getting refurbished, and will have more space and facilities for kids and teens, and will be more efficient to run and warmer in winter. But no, EDT_Forumite_752 had kids who did an exam 20 years ago, and this makes them an expert on library refurbishment who can see it's all just stuff and nonsense for the green agenda and why can't it all be put off... 😡😡😡
    • I completely misread the previous post, sorry. For some reason I thought the mini cooper was also a police vehicle, DUH.
    • This has given me ideas for the ginger wine I love, that no one else likes!      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...