Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I've only gone and joined the 21st century and got an all singing all dancing smart phone, and would you believe it or not you can actually use it as a phone as well! I'm even using it now to post this message!!


Problem is I'm a bit of a clutz and am prone to dropping things, especially phones - you know the deal - child in one hand, car keys in the other, phone rings, quick fumble around and hey presto phone ends up on the floor!!


So I was wandering what people's experience was with phone insurance. Is it worth paying for a current account which gives you "free" phone insurance - what are people's experiences with the various banks when it comes to claiming?


Any help / advise would be greatly appreciated in this bamboozling industry 😃

I can't answer your questions, but going off at a slight tangent, what I do is get a protective film for the screen and a gel back or cover for the back (which is on permanently). These have so far prevented damage even when I drop the phone.

When I got my first smart phone (ages ago), I remember looking at the option my bank offered but decided not to go with it. Instead I went with my network (O2) and paid about ?7 per month. If you have a contract and lose or break the phone, you still have to pay for it for the next one/two years until it expires so I think it's important to be covered.


Last year I upgraded to my latest smart phone only to find that O2 and most of the other networks only offer insurance against loss but not against the phone going wrong or getting broken anymore. I posted on here for recommendations.

In the end I spent hours on-line looking at all the different mobile phone insurance companies and what they offered. The majority didn't give new for new or cover loss.


Luckily I found one that does both. I've not needed to claim but it's peace of mind, knowing I'm covered. The phone would be really expensive to replace if anything happens to it before it's paid for in 18 months.

I can't remember the company's name off hand but it costs ?7.99 per month.


I also use a screen protector and gel case which are very good to have.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...