Jump to content

Recommended Posts

http://www.standard.co.uk/news/london/thousands-set-to-attend-reclaim-brixton-rally-as-campaigners-protest-against-gentrification-10158208.html


Not totally sure how I feel about this.


On one hand the negative side of gentrification is obvious, people feeling disengaged/disenfranchised from the community, renters and businesses being priced out of the area, etc. I appreciate the history of the area... but on the other hand, places change, people move around. It happens.


From a more self-centred angle... the area has lost a lot of its edginess which made it a destination for me and my mates back in the late 90s/early 2000s, but I'm not 21 any more, and I personally quite like the way the area has developed.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/56470-reclaim-brixton/
Share on other sites

I was reading about this yesterday. I totally sympathise with those that feel they're being alienated from their home, and I definitely am against the development around the arches.


But there are plenty of comments from people (including young people) who say they grew up there and much prefer it now.


I think with gentrification there is always a line where it goes too far.


What I really don't like it gentrification on a large scale involving developers. That's when people start to feel like social cleansing is at play.


But stopping an area feeling dangerous after dark is never a bad thing.

The area feels a lot safer now, that's for sure. Being hassled for cash was part and parcel of a night out in Brixton in 98. And of course you could buy drugs quite openly.. which seemed great at the time, but probably not so desirable if you live round the corner.


I really like what's happened in the market - but I can understand locals feeling that it's not really catering to them (see Jay Rayner's scathing review of the hipster fried chicken place).


As for redeveloping the arches, it seems rather unnecessary, and opportunisitic money grabbing by Network Rail. (and looks like the same might be happening in Peckham). Nobody likes seeing local businesses being booted out.

My dad worked in the market for years, and whilst it was a bit grimey, it was great, so many cool little shops. I do think that's a loss. But hey, lots of other people would have thought it was a shit hole and will prefer their little bars and stuff.


At the end of the day whatever makes the most money will win out.

It is indeed a tricky one... when you have a city with lots of affluent young-ish people, but nevertheless the traditionally "nice" areas are out of reach for them... gentrification of working class neighbourhoods is inevitable. But at the same time, it isn't right that long term residents and shop keepers are booted out.
I think the gentrification argument has probably been had in all corners of London.. from Notting Hill to Islington to Hackney to Clapham. But I think to some extent Brixton is seen as a special case, in that it's sometimes regarded as the de-facto home of black London (even black Britain).
I smiled when I saw the 'Yuppies Out' graffiti a few months ago in Brixton. Just shows you the age and attitude of those objecting to gentrification, as no-one apart from an 80s post-punk class warrior would use such a phrase. And I wonder what the locals thought when the post-punk class warriors moved in in the first place...

Ethnic cleansing.


Look at the change in demographics. It's happened around here.


Elephant will be next.


It was quite exciting when I lived just up the road from Loughborough Junction (still a well dodgy area).


PS you can all clear off back to Clapham/Shoreditch. I'll let you judge whether I am saying this in jest (not sure myself).

brezzo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Squatters, anarchists, alternative life stylists

> are often the harbingers of gentrification, but

> they are usually loath to acknowledge it.



That's because they're ashamed that lots of really dull people have moved in trying to bask in their cool light.


ED had a different gentrification, it was never really cool.

Otta Wrote:

------------------------------------------------------

> That's because they're ashamed that lots of really

> dull people have moved in trying to bask in their cool light.


TBH most of the squatters and "anarchists" from the 80s/90s have probably become dull, boring conformists themselves.


But yeah a lot of the people who were into Brixton because of it's "edginess" have probably paved the way for its gentrification in some way.


> ED had a different gentrification, it was never really cool.


ED never had nightlife, it was never really a magnet for cool 20-somethings... it was just a reasonably pleasant, affordable neighbourhood in zone 2, and it sprang from there.

miga Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I like the idea of a 50+ squatter spray painting

> 80s slogans on walls, but the scenario of that 50+

> person being a marketing executive enjoying a fine

> wine in a nicely renovated Victorian property

> seems more likely somehow.



:)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Why is the name a big of a red flag? Blighty is a common name for the UK whatever people might think.
    • The only election which counts is the General Election.  There is still strong resentment for fourteen year's of Conservative rule. They squeezed the working class's way to hard, then they squeezed the middle class, but somehow the upper class never got touched, funny that.   There is also new resentment for Labour because of the utter balls up they've made of things since coming to power nine months ago. The majority of the population (or at least those with an ounce of common sense) want these clowns out of office ASAP because they see the damage they are doing to UK plc. They squeezed the pensioners, then the farmers and then business. They made and broke promise after promise, or just didn't tell the truth or say what they where going to do, otherwise known as merely lying to get elected. Inflation may be falling but the cost of things in the shops and utility bills keep on rising, the direct opposite of what they promised. They will never be trusted once they are ousted from power in about four and a half years time.   Everything they do and touch causes further harm, led by three stooges, Rayner, Reeves and balls'less Starmer, who couldn't fight his way out of a paper bag. He still thinks he's a solicitor at the DPP. Rather than spending week upon week getting involved in international politics he needs to be sorting out the UK's issues, sadly he's not up to the job and nor are his Cabinet.  Society needs a mix of people with different skills to prosper, not more and more graduates who can't get jobs in what they studied in.   Reform is the current anti establishment party, which will hopefully wither away back to where it came from.  The Liberals and Greens, well what can you say apart from using them as another alternative vote of dissatisfaction, but neither will come to power.  The country seriously needs stability and a Government that stands up for and represents it's people, not what MP's want but what the constituencies want and need.  Government needs to become far more open and transparent, it needs to be seen to be doing its job, doing what MP's are elected to do,  working for the people in the constituencies, getting back to basic principles and rebuilding the trust which has been lost by successive party's immaterial of them being, red, blue, light blue, yellow, green or some other colour.     
    • That’s very insulting! You are basically calling 17 million people that voted to leave the EU ‘thick’.        Brexit happened Sue.  Boring graphs!  Calling Nigel Farage a plastic patriot is also very insulting seeing as he and the Reform Party have had a landslide victory all over England.
    • These charity collectors are often classed as chuggers.  It can be scandalous that the charity/admin may keep a huge percentage of your donations and a tiny percentage is  actually given to the charity.   I can not speak for individual collectors - but it common practice.  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...