Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Explain please this "wider phallic manoeuvre". It's not in my edition (which admittedly is not quite up-to-date) and is obviously the only reason why Canada Water could be illegal. FL clearly agrees. Please explain in suitable MC detail why you can claim to have won.

Ah but its quite elementary my dear David. If memory serves me correct it was first used during by Liberated Mornington Crescent Society during the 3rd Glastonbury Festival (it was fringe gathering only reported in the local press). It was considered far too risqu? and puerile until its revival and inclusion in the mainstream game by the Royal Society in 1993.


The easiest way to explain would be for me to take you through the moves we have seen above:


Cockfoster's -> Nelson's Column -> St John's Wood


Successful execution usually leads to victory within 6 moves.

Quite - never can put things in simple terms! One minute they're accusing the winner of trickery and calling for an enquiry (I concede by the way), the next they're defending them using the most arcane rules of them all. Game in 6? Pah! We had same in 3 predicted before and that never happened.


But (grudgingly) - well done Peckhamgatecrasher. Let's play again sometime, though I'll need to review a more recent rulebook with this sort of competition!

Peckhamgatecrasher Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Sorry all. I did crib - I bought a Humphrey

> Littleton Memorial Pamphlet at auction recently:

> someone had scribbled the moves on the inside

> cover.


Sorry but I Haven't A Clue why nobody else hasn't objected to this reference to Humphrey.


Mis-spelling of that fine fellow Humphrey LYttleton surely disqualifies PGC's thread-winning move?


Referee(!)(?)

I am an independent adjudicator from The Royal Society. This game was called to my attention by one of the players. I've put the moves through the Society's Analyser and technically none are illegal. There have been some churlish and rather silly, wicked and confusifying moves (e.g. the game could have been brought to an end after the move to Nelson's Column [via Monument obviously]).


I have no choice but to reset it to VICTORIA (get it)?!!


Enjoy the rest of the game (shouldn't be too far off now).


TMCA

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Having enjoyed a day with Sayce HolmesLewis, I understand what you’re saying.  I appreciate your courage responding on here. 
    • Thank you to everyone who has already shared their thoughts on this. Dawson Heights Estate in the 1980s, while not as infamous as some other estates, did have its share of anti-social behaviour and petty crime. My brother often used the estate as a shortcut when coming home from his girlfriend’s house, despite my parents warning him many times to avoid it. Policing during that era had a distinctly “tough on crime” approach. Teenagers, particularly those from working-class areas or minority communities, were routinely stopped, questioned, and in some cases, physically handled for minor infractions like loitering, skateboarding, or underage drinking. Respect for authority wasn’t just expected—it was demanded. Talking back to a police officer could escalate a situation very quickly, often with harsh consequences. This was a very different time. There were no body cameras, dash cams, or social media to hold anyone accountable or to provide a record of encounters. Policing was far more physical and immediate, with few technological safeguards to check officer behaviour. My brother wasn’t known to the police. He held a full-time job at the Army and Navy store in Lewisham and had recently been accepted into the army. Yet, on that night, he ran—not because he was guilty of anything—but because he knew exactly what would happen if he were caught on an estate late at night with a group of other boys. He was scared, and rightfully so.
    • I'm sure many people would look to see if someone needed help, and if so would do something about it, and at least phone the police if necessary if they didn't feel confident helping directly. At least I hope so. I'm sorry you don't feel safe, but surely ED isn't any less safe than most places. It's hardly a hotbed of crime, it's just that people don't post on here if nothing has happened! And before that, there were no highwaymen,  or any murders at all .... In what way exactly have we become "a soft apologetic society", whatever that means?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...