Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I quite regularly see a male cyclist going past Alleyn's school with a toddler seated on the back (in correct safety seat) but she has no helmet and the main concern is that Dad also has 2 dogs in tow who run along the road on their leads which Dad holds whilst attempting to steer. It looks like a disaster waiting to happen. Does anyone know them? One of the hounds is quite big and it surely wouldn't take much for it to either get spooked or see a cat/squirrel and pull the bike over. Thoughts?
To see them wobbling along Townley Road pretty regularly makes me feel uneasy. As a mother myself, I worry about what could happen in most eventualities where a child is concerned. Would it be rude to pull over and talk to the guy? I guess not. It is the most bizarre sight.
If its a usual time he passes with this selfish behaviour then get some police advice and see if they can do something. Quite often people, although parents can be quite nasty when told about something their doing wrong. Better to do something than nothing, else guilt is pretty awful to live with.

Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at the rear of their bicycle

and a second seated on what appeared to be another seat on the cross-bar.


I simple could not believe it.


Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering the lives of your kids.


DulwichFox

Pugwash Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> The cross bar and rear seats are common sight in

> Holland where I lived for a few months, with

> adults carrying 2 children


Cycling in Holland is a lot safer with purpose built Cycle lanes and a history of using bicycles.


Cycling here in the UK is different with inexperienced riders buying bicycles with no road experience

perhaps not even having been a car driver with road awareness and knowledge of road signs.


DulwichFox


See also those bloody carriages people attach to the backs of their bikes and pull kids along in. Bloody dangerous!



Not at all a fan of those myself - Bakfiets cargo bikes are enormously better for all sorts of reasons - but if you think it's the bike that's dangerous, you *may* be looking in the wrong place. I'm not playing semantics - it's quite uncommon in my experience for inanimate tarmac to leap off the ground and smack you about the head.


Best contraption I've seen around here is a chap cycling up Camberwell Grove on a stretch tandem with THREE smallish children all in a long line pedaling away.


And biggest idiot? Another fellow cycling along the A202, no handed, juggling. At least the balls were glow-in-the-dark for visibility though :o)

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at

> the rear of their bicycle

> and a second seated on what appeared to be

> another seat on the cross-bar.

>

> I simple could not believe it.

>

> Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering

> the lives of your kids.

>

> DulwichFox


1/10

Some friends of mine used to take their baby boy out in a carriage behind their tandem bike (I think they might still do it with their youngest). They're good people and of course I respect their right to do whatever they think best, but whenever I saw them on this contraption I was absolutely terrified.


It's all very well to say "the bikes aren't the problem, it's the cars/trucks/buses".. and you'd be right... but at the same time, when it comes to personal safety you just have to realise that the roads are FULL of bad, selfish, aggressive drivers.

Otta Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> rahrahrah Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Children transported by bike shocker.

>

>

> No one is saying children shouldn't be transported

> by bike.


I think you'll find they are....

Bunch of busybodies!


Should you "have a word with him"? No. Mind your own bloody business. He's not breaking any laws. I see a guy going up and down Crystal Palace Rd on a bike with his young son (aged 5 or 6) on a small bike in front of him. I think how wonderful that he's teaching his son road skills and drive appropriately in the circumstances.


This is why the new 20mph limit is such a good idea. It will make the roads safer for cyclists and encourage more children onto the roads.


We have an obesity epidemic in thsi country - we should encourage children on bikes at all times.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Bunch of busybodies!

>

> Should you "have a word with him"? No. Mind your

> own bloody business. He's not breaking any laws. I

> see a guy going up and down Crystal Palace Rd on a

> bike with his young son (aged 5 or 6) on a small

> bike in front of him. I think how wonderful that

> he's teaching his son road skills.


Totally agree.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Well I recently saw some 'idiot' with a child at

> the rear of their bicycle

> and a second seated on what appeared to be

> another seat on the cross-bar.

>

> I simple could not believe it.

>

> Bicycles are dangerous enough without endangering

> the lives of your kids.

>

> DulwichFox




Hmm, interesting view.


I used to regularly take my two kids on the bike that way, which they loved. The seat on the cross bar was a 'Weeride' (very comfortable and protective for the child), which makes the bike very stable as it centres the child's weight with that of the rider, counterbalancing the weight of the child at the back. This included going up and down Dog Kennel Hill on the nursery run.


I do not consider myself an idiot, nor would I do anything to endanger my kids. Even my wife, despite being terrified of cycling in London herself, felt confident that I could keep them safe.


You seem to have a very strong opinion there. What's your experience of cycling , Foxy?

From the OP: "I quite regularly see a male cyclist going past Alleyn's school with a toddler seated on the back (in correct safety seat) but she has no helmet and the main concern is that Dad also has 2 dogs in tow who run along the road on their leads which Dad holds whilst attempting to steer. It looks like a disaster waiting to happen......To see them wobbling along Townley Road pretty regularly makes me feel uneasy. "



Short of any statistics to show that riding with dogs has actually increased the chance of falling over when compared to riding alone, any judgement over the inevitability of disaster, which is what the OP asserted, can at best be a very subjective guess. The intuitive assumption that the dogs will pullthe bike over must be analysed further. The likelihood of that is conditioned very much on the combined weight of the bike and the two people, and also on the degree of anticipation of the rider. Would the OP have overlooked these factors in her estimate that the Dad wobbled along Townley road ?


The degree of danger exposed to the rider must also be considered in relation to the route. Townley road is not a highway as Pugwash put it. There are traffic in the morning, but it is not heavy and the cars are slow. I have actually observed that on average about 3 to 4 cars pass in 1 minute at a speed of around 10 miles per hour. An average rider would have completed that stretch of road in around 1.5 minutes. His average danger would be proportional to that of 5 cars going pass. This does not sounds excessive. One could make a reasonable comment that 1 car is enough to cause accident. This is tautological. An accident is indeed the occurrence of an unlikely event. 1 car is also enough to knock down a bike rider which is not carrying a child and 2 dogs running next to it.


So - this is my analysis, and I reach the logical conclusion that it is best to leave the judgement of safety to the dad.

actuarygi Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Townley road is not a highway as Pugwash put it.


Can you explain that statement. A highway in my dictionary is " a public road on which all have the right to go"


I thought I had the right to go down Townley road, at least last time I was there I did. Are you suggesting that Townley road is excempt from the highway code?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Ahh, the old "it's only three days" chestnut.  I do hope you realise the big metal walls, stages, tents, toilets, lighting, sound equipment, refreshments, concessions etc don't just magically appear & disappear overnight? You know it all has to be transported in & erected, constructed? And that when stuff is constructed, like on a construction site, it's quite noisy & distracting? Banging, crashing, shouting, heavy plant moving around - beep beep beep reversing signals, engines revving - pneumatic tools? For 8 to 10 hours a day, every day? And that it tends to go on for two or three weeks before an event, and a week after when they take it all down again? I'm sure my boys' GCSE prep won't be affected by any of that, especially if we close the windows (before someone suggests that as a resolution). I'm sure it won't affect anyone at the Harris schools either, actually taking their exams with that background noise.
    • Thanks for the good discussion, this should be re-titled as a general thread about feeding the birds. @Penguin not really sure why you posted, most are aware that virtually all land in this country is managed, and has been for 100s of years, but there are many organisations, local and national government, that manage large areas of land that create appropriate habitats for British nature, including rewilding and reintroductions.  We can all do our bit even if this is not cutting your lawn, and certainly by not concreting over it.  (or plastic grass, urgh).   I have simply been stating that garden birds are semi domesticated, as perhaps the deer herds in Richmond Park, New Forest ponies, and even some foxes where we feed them.  Whoever it was who tried to get a cheap jibe in about Southwark and the Gala festival.  Why?  There is a whole thread on Gala for you to moan on.  Lots going on in Southwark https://www.southwark.gov.uk/culture-and-sport/parks-and-open-spaces/ecology-and-wildlife I've talked about green sqwaky things before, if it was legal I'd happily use an air riffle, and I don't eat meat.  And grey squirrels too where I am encourage to dispatch them. Once a small group of starlings also got into the garden I constructed my own cage using starling proof netting, it worked for a year although I had to make a gap for the great spotted woodpecker to get in.  The squirrels got at it in the summer but sqwaky things still haven't come back, starlings recently returned.  I have a large batch of rubbish suet pellets so will let them eat them before reordering and replacing the netting. Didn't find an appropriately sized cage, the gaps in the mesh have to be large enough for finches etc, and the commercial ones were £££ The issue with bird feeders isn't just dirty ones, and I try to keep mine clean, but that sick birds congregate in close proximity with healthy birds.  The cataclysmic obliteration of the greenfinch population was mainly due to dirty feeders and birds feeding close to each other.  
    • Another recommendation for Niko - fitted me in the next day, simple fix rather than trying to upsell and a nice guy as well. Will use again
    • Looks great! but could it be possible to pinch the frames a bit tighter with some long nose pliers and add more struts to stop the tree rats getting inside? Also, the only issue with a mesh base is that it could attract rats towards your property.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...