Jump to content

Recommended Posts

the-e-dealer Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> sO IF YOU WANT TO READ SOMETHING YOU DONT HAVE TO

> HUNT FOR YOUR GLASSES

Tis okies no need for the large print im wearing my own (as opposed to anyone elses) glasses now ta.

My point being ppl who walk around like i said look stoopid. Just get that string thingamy or wear them on ya head when not using them... u know it makes sense ;-)


In other news... nearly empty yet not quite enuff of a squeeze toof paste tubes

People with their headphones on who are totally unaware of what is going on around them, so can't hear you when you politely say excuse me when trying to get past them as they amble along , and then look affronted when you are left with no choice but to barge past having said excuse me 3 times (the last time bellowing at them). Not sure that one is so irrational, but it really annoys me.

If you put them on your head they get tangled in your hair and the arms get stretched and then they are loose.

If you get the string things they are hanging down and can get damaged.

The idea is to get small frames and keep them on all the time and then put them on the edge of your nose peer over them when not reading.

Also ,people who need specs for reading are a certain age when they could not care less (if they ever did) if people think they look stupid. What's the problem KK?


I wish people would distinguish between a BRAKE (on a car) and a BREAK (in the sun or of a bone)

When I read 'put your breaks on..' for example, I think they have misspelled 'breeks'

Pubs that allow 'reserving' of tables/areas of said pub. Now pubs that you can only get a Sunday roast in if you have 'reserved' a table. They're pubs, not restaurants. Get there earlier people and claim your table/area and spend money on drinks!

OMG, have we met? Didn't realise I'd upset you. Sorry.



Vik Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> People who don't have their reading glasses (My

> M-I-L mainly) so can't look at what you're showing

> them.

> If you can't read with without glasses, why not

> carry them with you?

steveo Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> unlurked Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Clouds of flies that disperse en masse from dog

> > sh*t on the pavement as you walk past them,

>

> Yes where do bluebottles go when they aren't doing

> there sh*t thing?


They head straight for peoples sandwiches and get their shitty little feet all over yer warburtons - bloody things - dont see the point of flys

(They lay eggs on and in dead things then the maggots eat the decaying matter. If it wasn't for decay and putrefaction there would be a layer of garbage of all types covering the Earth to a depth of 1 kilometre.)


People who ask you to do something at the last minute when you could have been informed earlier. I think they want you to fail so it makes them look good

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Just go to the park like everyone else who didn’t buy a ticket. 
    • I was lucky enough to go to Japan earlier in the year and late one night ended up having to drunkenly navigate my way back to the hotel using my phone. I was briefly nervous, then realised I was in Japan and they don't really do street crime/phone snatching and all was fine. My point being, I don't spend a lot of time worrying about safety in London, but I wonder if I/we have got so used to being on edge (holding bags/phones close) we don't give it much conscious thought. And yes, as mostly a pedestrian if there was less traffic crime my life would be a lot calmer!
    • There’s an interesting discussion to be had on the need for infrastructure generally and on bottlenecks in specific areas, as noted above. However on new houses specifically, I’ve never understood the infrastructure argument. The people to go in the new houses already exist and are already using infrastructure. Thanks to twenty years of under-building we’ve got millions of adults stuck living with parents, living in house shares, paying a fortune to rent cramped flats etc - that’s what a housing crisis is. They’re presumably all using road/trains, showering and weeing whilst doing so. Building them houses doesn’t necessarily increase the need for infrastructure much, if at all. The Abundance Agenda podcast is a great listen if you’re interested in this stuff.
    • Maurice Hinds did a great job fixing my leaking central heating, rebalancing my radiators, and getting my boiler going. Very nice man, highly recommended. Maurice - +44 7720 648273
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...