Jump to content

Recommended Posts

so.. can I be Minnie the Minx and Bonnie (in the lovely strong arms of Clyde of course)


*scurries to wardrobe to try and find unusual mix of black and red striped top, plus elegant long black skirt... hhhmm... could create a rather fetching Parisian look, she thinks*

oh yes Quids... thank you so much for your patience on Friday... us girls got into a deep political discussion in the loo

(well not actually in it as such, that would have been rather messy) and time just flew by...


hhhmmm... not sure it was very deep, really... think we were all a bit p*ssed>:D<




and I think you look quite strong enough to pick me up like that.... are you saying I look heavy Quids... how very rude, I might just take offence and tell you off for being so cliquey and talking to me in a perfectly friendly and normal way even though you don't really know me from Adam

(who is Adam anyway? is that his forum name or real name?)

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> (who is Adam anyway? is that his forum name or

> real name?)


He hung around the EDF for a while, but he got the Eveho.

See he kept starting threads on the ED Issues and Gossip section about this large fruiting plant he had in the administrative centre and county city of Norfolk.

It was all Tree Of Norwich this and Tree Of Norwich that. Then this 'Eve' character joined in and kept encouraging him.

Admin warned them nuff times, ya know, but they insisted it was their Tree Of Norwich and they could do as they blimmin' liked, what with this being a democracy and all.

Well Admin showed them democracy, all right.

He waxed wrath and great was his displeasure. Any way the upshot was he banished them both east of ED.

So Camberwell or thereabouts I reckon, though my compass is a bit shonky so I could be wrong.

Shame really I quite liked Eve, though she soon learned you can only rib Admin so much.

at this time of night the above thread seems to be blurring Admin and Adam into one (in my head anyway) so I'll leave it till the morning...


nice to see you at The Mag tonight HB... good food, good backgammon too

nightie nite all

xxcc


ps no wonder she fancied Adam (or is it Admin)

just look at his wonderful ****

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_H-XnFgVGDeo/R4mevvIalCI/AAAAAAAAABs/VYGanWYgAWk/s400/Frank+Eugene.+Adam+and+Eve.jpg

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> nice to see you at The Mag tonight HB... good

> food, good backgammon too

> nightie nite all

> xxcc


I was at the Mag tonight? I've learned to play backgammon?

So I wonder who it was round at mine, half watching CSI, then Late Live and reading The Wrong Boy?

Either my evil twin was impersonating me at home or the Mag. Either way he's in trouble.

oh I must have been mistaken... oh no... look! you were there, I took a pic with my mobile... you've even got your dog with you, and look there's brendan too... and me peeping out from behind...


http://creativedundee.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/2008/07/21/beanocharacters_2.gif


ps... I am ashamed to say I got you muddled up with Sean... who had gone to see In Bruge at the Mag,

ops... so sorry, there's still some confusion in my head with the forum monikers and the real names and all that...

am I forgiven?

xxcc

charliecharlie Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh I must have been mistaken... oh no... look! you

> were there, I took a pic with my mobile... you've

> even got your dog with you, and look there's

> brendan too... and me peeping out from behind...

>

> http://creativedundee.typepad.com/photos/uncategor

> ized/2008/07/21/beanocharacters_2.gif

>

> ps... I am ashamed to say I got you muddled up

> with Sean... who had gone to see In Bruge at the

> Mag,

> ops... so sorry, there's still some confusion in

> my head with the forum monikers and the real names

> and all that...

> am I forgiven?

> xxcc


Of course you're forgiven Charlies, by me at least.

I wouldn't be sanguine about Sean's response to being mistaken for me though.

It may require all your powers of diplomacy to mend the fences on this one.

Mind it's a relief to know my evil twin isn't back in town.

There are still several places I can't show my face after the last time.

And Dennis The Menace, I wish!

no, no HB, don't worry, Sean PMed me and said "how cool" to be mistaken for you!

Oh lord (to keep up with the current themes), hope I haven't broken some unspoken forum rule of confidence on PM's:-$


ps Brendan said he's Denis the Menace... so I guess that means you are either the little chap on the left or the goofy one... but I'm sure you aren't a bit like either of them though...



thanks for the above...

xxcc

All I can say Charlies is how cool SM thought that it was cool to be mistaken for me.

Quite made my day that has.

I think the rule about pm confidentiality is that if by disclosing the contents of a pm you make someones day then no tort or malfeasance is committed. It's an unwritten rule, mind.

The little chap on the left? Roger The Dodger? I wish.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hi - I posted a request for some help with a stuck door and possible leaky roof. I had responses from Lukasz at Look_as.com and Pawel at Sublime Builders. I don't see any/many reviews - has anyone used either person?  Could use a recommendation rather then just being contact by the tradespeople... Many Thanks 
    • I'm a bit worried by your sudden involvement on this Forum.  The former Prince Andrew is now Andrew Mountbatten Windsor Mountbatten in an anglicisation of Von Battenburg adopted by that branch of our Royal Family in 1917 due to anti-German sentiment. Another anglicisation could be simply Battenburg as in the checker board cake.  So I surmise that your are Andrew Battenburg, aka Andrew Mountbatten Windsor and that you have infiltrated social media so that the country can put the emphasis on Mandelson rather than yourself.  Bit of a failure. I don't expect an answer from police custody.  
    • We had John fit our PLYKEA kitchen (IKEA cabinets with custom doors) and would happily recommend him and Gabi to anyone. Gabi handled all communication and was brilliant throughout — responsive and happy to answer questions however detailed. John is meticulous, cares about the small details, and was a pleasure to have in the house. The carpentry required for the custom doors was done to a high standard, and he even refinished the plumbing under the sink to sit better with the new cabinets — a small touch that made a real difference. They were happy to return and tie up a few things that couldn't be finished in the time, which we appreciated. No hesitations recommending them.
    • Not sure about that. Rockets seems to have (rightly in my view) identified two key motivating elements in Mcash's defection: anger at his previous (arguably shabby) treatment and a (linked) desire to trash the Labour party, nationally and locally. The defection, timed for maximum damage, combined with the invective and moral exhibitionism of his statement counts as rather more than a "hissy fit".  I would add a third motivation of political ambition: it's not inconceivable that he has his eye on the Dulwich & West Norwood seat which is predicted to go Green.  James Barber was indulging in typical LibDem sleight of hand, claiming that Blair introduced austerity to *councils* before the coalition. This is a kind of sixth form debating point. From 1997-1999 Labour broadly stuck to Tory spending totals, meaning there was limited growth in departmental spending, including local govt grants. However local government funding rose substantially in the Noughties, especially in education and social care. It is a matter of record that real-terms local authority spending increased in the Blair / Brown years overall. So he's manifestly wrong (or only right if the focus is on 1997-1999, which would be a bizarre focus and one he didn't include in his claim) but he wasn't claiming Blair introduced austerity more widely. 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...