Jump to content

Recommended Posts

So just found out that Boris Johnson may have a lot to answer for; what did he say to the police that he met just before the protest's how did he say he wanted the situation dealt with, did he make it clear that he had no time for these "crustys" and they should be severely dealt with: 9 years under the last Major numerous protests and no incidents anywhere near on this scale i.e Manslaughter. If you have any doubt that the Conservative party have in noway changed their spots then this death and the manner in which the event was policed under a conservative major of london says everything. Apparently the tory spin machine picked this up on the day and have been in hiding ever since no wonder they want to raise this smear thing and keep it in the headlines, this is a disaster for any would be conservative government. This is Boris Blue Boy Johnson's leading article in the telegrpah a few days before the g20 summit...inflammatory or what ! No wonder the police were so heavy handed.


" the alienated children of the middle classes are planning to subvert the G20 summit. Across the desolate wastes of the Leftie internet, their wrathful campfires are already burning, and when April dawns they will surge like the orcs of Mordor in the general direction of the Bank of England."


What a nob this man is....surely he needs to be called to account, an open and public review is needed, he needs to be questioned.

Re: JetSetWilly's earlier assertion that the police will be shown in a more positive light in time re: Tomlinson


It's not looking that way yet, and getting worse day by day


I've been keeping abreast of this and what's shocking me is the lack of shock on the police side. Lots of policemen saying the coverage is one-sided and biase (and in the context of this story there is a bit of that) but not one of them wants to deal with the repercussions of what this actually means. Instead of addressing the issue head on, and the breakdown of trust that will ensue, they are adopting a seige mentality


Unimpressed

The 'new' still footage in the guardian makes them look, well even better. He's just standing on his own by a tree and some bikes hands in his pockets completely minding his own business when a group of 6 police walk towards him from a fair distance away and well.....beat him till he dies.....


any other footage or is it all in some government building somewhere being erased.

Sean, I'm not at all surprised.


The police have been doing this stuff for years, decades. They are not shocked because that is what quite a few of them have been doing all their lives. I was there for just a very few of them e.g. at a marriage ceremony in Brixton when the first Brixton riots broke out two hundred yards away and witness to just what kind of shit the police got up to then. I've seen things far, far worse than what we are seeing on all this video footage etc. Circa 1981.


The difference now is that just about everyone has a camera or phone with camera or camcorder or whatever. Before, there was never any indisputable evidence. Now there is. That's great. Just a pity that we apparently cannot now legally take pix of the plods. How convenient!


They are perhaps only shocked/surprised that they have been 'found out' in terms of public opinion in 'middle England'. They are not used to being on the front page of the Daily Wail pictured doing their mis-deeds.

Very interesting protest at the 'Den' today - outside the ground with i think some of his relatives and right in in front of the police a man dressed in a funeral directors top hat and tails shouting in town crier fashion


"justice for ian tomlinson, a Millwall supporter killed by the FILTH ! , never let the bastards get you down"


Millwall went on to win 2-0 then the stadium erupted into a slow chant of MURDERERS then a sedate pitch invasion ensued police formed a line across the pitch and there was a momentary face off and still came the chants MURDERERS.

Yes good, positive and helpful I am sure that the Suffragettes had to throw a few stones at parliment to get things changed !


And what dreamy society are you talking about H-0 ? the one that driven by rampant capitalism which has in turn fuelled globalization to fulfill it's own aim's is about to get decimated by wonderful new strains of flu that have developed as a result.


Next time you sentence the guy's behind the website Pirate Bay to Death you will be wearing a oxygen suit to do it ! I am sure however there will only be enough for the society you choose at the time.....much love my friend.

But what caused this acceleration of swine flu evolution? Probably the same thing that has favored the reproduction of avian flu. Virologists have long believed that the intensive agricultural system of southern China--an immensely productive ecology of rice, fish, pigs, and domestic and wild birds--is the principal engine of influenza mutation: both seasonal "drift" and episodic genomic "shift." (More rarely, there may occur a direct leap from birds to pigs and/or humans, as with H5N1 in 1997.) But the corporate industrialization of livestock production has broken China's natural monopoly on influenza evolution. As many writers have pointed out, animal husbandry in recent decades has been transformed into something that more closely resembles the petrochemical industry than the happy family farm depicted in schoolbooks. In 1965, for instance, there were 53 million American hogs on more than 1 million farms; today, 65 million hogs are concentrated in 65,000 facilities--half with more than 5,000 animals. This has been a transition, in essence, from old-fashioned pig pens to vast excremental hells, unprecedented in nature, containing tens, even hundreds of thousands of animals with weakened immune systems, suffocating in heat and manure, while exchanging pathogens at blinding velocity with their fellow inmates and pathetic progenies.


Off Topic or what - another thread maybe !

I think it's population that demands intensive farming, not capitalism. We should really by thanking our lucky stars that capitalism provides the investment and incentive to develop appropriate solutions.


Regardless, I'm rather staggered that anyone would imagine that the best solution for a law and order issue is to riot.

it's not a law and order issue though is it ? thats certainly not a definition of law and order killing a man becuase you fancy bashing some crustys ! Don't be staggered , a brick thrown from a mob will get you staggering !

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • @HeadNun I haven't been through the assessment for mental health issues, god knows they treat you like you have one when you are assessed for motability issues. Therefore I can't comment on what you've read but don't always believe what the media telks you as they often sensationalise things to sell papers and bend the story slightly 😉  All I am doing in this thread is asking people who disagree to the PIP reform in its current format to write to their MP to say so and ask for a well consulted and thought through change. I'm not here to change people's minds but happy to discuss how disability impacts lives.
    • I hate the idea of someone with a genuine disability losing money, it's heart-breaking. I thought the whole idea of these cuts was to get kids with mental health issues, which we used to call 'the human condition', off benefits and into a job. Before anyone says anything, I'm not talking about people with severe autism.  If the tests are so astringent, Spartacus, how come healthy youngsters with anxiety are getting benefits? It's ludicrous.  This from The Times:  Then there is mental health. This is the fastest-growing category of claim; anxiety and depression is now the single biggest reason to claim PIPs, accounting for 16 per cent of spending. Including problems such as autism and ADHD, there are 1.4 million people claiming for “psychiatric disorders”, almost 40 per cent of the total.   NHS figures on Thursday found that 23 per cent of people of working age now have a mental disorder, up from 18 per cent a decade ago, rising to 26 per cent in 16 to 24 year-olds. Young people are most likely to claim benefits for mental health problems and there is growing concern about a generation who may do so for decades. The number of children on disability living allowance, the precursor to PIPs, will reach a million by the end of the decade, double pre-Covid levels. Most of these are for behavioural problems such as ADHD or learning disabilities  
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...