Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, has said he believes in the "freedom to hunt" and wants fox hunting legalised.


He has said he has "always been a strong supporter of country sports" and that "it is [his] firm belief that people should have the freedom to hunt".


After their majority win in the election on 7th May 2015, the Conservatives will very likely hold a parliamentary vote on repealing the fox hunting ban.


This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but a chance to express any apposing views and sign the petition.


eOizvTZttfGAxoX-800x450-noPad.jpg


https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-mp-keep-the-ban-on-fox-hunting-2


DulwichFox Protecting our precious wild life.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but a

> chance to express any apposing views and sign the petition.


Not that I really care one way or the other about the subject, but you don't have the right to define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but

> a

> > chance to express any apposing views and sign

> the petition.

>

> Not that I really care one way or the other about

> the subject, but you don't have the right to

> define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.


This subject has been discussed to death. If you want to Resurrect an old thread or start a new one

please feel to do so.


This thread has been raised to raise awareness of the current Petition to the Government.


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

>

> Not that I really care one way or the other about

> the subject, but you don't have the right to

> define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.



Regardless of what can/can't be added to the thread, I'm so intrigued about something, I'm asking anyway:


Loz, WHY don't you care?

Don't personally understand how anyone in the 21st century can seriously be pro anything that involves murdering an innocent animal for the fun of it, then spending most of your time complaining about your human rights when you've been banned from partaking in this so called "sport". This shouldn't been be on the agenda for reconsideration, it was abolished for a reason.


Louisa.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Regardless of what can/can't be added to the thread, I'm so intrigued about something, I'm asking anyway:

>

> Loz, WHY don't you care?


Because it is argument packed with complete losers on both sides. One side, some well meaning animals types who are far outnumbered by idiotic class warriors. The other, some well meaning traditional country types who are far outnumbered by a different type of idiotic class warriors.


A pox on both their houses, frankly.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clever answer Loz, but just wondering which side you would be on.

> The victimised fox or the murderous sicko's?


> Or the no idea, don't have a clue, sitting on the fencers?


I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I care on the subject. As I said, I find too many morons on both side of the argument to want to take sides.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Clever answer Loz, but just wondering which side

> you would be on.

> > The victimised fox or the murderous sicko's?

>

> > Or the no idea, don't have a clue, sitting on

> the fencers?

>

> I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> morons on both side of the argument to want to

> take sides.


If you do not care one way or the other then why don't you look for another thread to hi-jack.

It's something you seem to be very good at.


Like I said this thread is to bring attention to a petition for people who do care to be able to participate.


and that's all it is....


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> ---------------------

>

> I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> morons on both side of the argument to want to

> take sides.



It's not about moron people, it's about the FOX!


If you care about them being ripped to shreds, or if you don't.


If you really don't care, have a think about it from the fox's side. How can you not care? Unbelievable.


Do you have pets? Dogs, cats, foxes, all feel you know.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > aquarius moon Wrote:

> > ---------------------

> >

> > I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> > care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> > morons on both side of the argument to want to

> > take sides.

>

>

> It's not about moron people, it's about the FOX!

>

> If you care about them being ripped to shreds, or if you don't.

>

> If you really don't care, have a think about it

> from the fox's side. How can you not care?

> Unbelievable.

>

> Do you have pets? Dogs, cats, foxes, all feel you know.


I've seen rabbits with myxomatosis (highly unpleasant) and foxes that were not taken out with a clean shot and almost certainly died in much pain. Other ways of animal control like snares are even worse. Rat poison causes them to bleed internally until they die.


So why only fox hunting with dogs? This is the crux of what I don't get. This is why I feel that it's just a class issue, hijacking an animal issue. And if it's just a class issue, then, yes, I don't care.

It's not a class issue though is it?


And you know how I feel. Snares, rat poison, any blood sport (fox/deer hunting, hare coursing, shooting) turns my stomach.


I would ban it all but this thread is about fox hunting.


I'd even ban mouse traps. But a living creature being chased, terrifed, then torn into bits while still alive and screaming in pain?


Think about it.

Loz I am in shock at your sheer splitting of hairs over this issue. Any form of cruelty is wrong surely? we are all animals, we all feel pain. You seem to be bypassing the cruelty aspect and refering to some bizarre class issue.


That reminds me, as an aside, hands off greedy that's historically my beef.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Counterpoint: there was zero misrepresentation of truth    never mind the bbc or the uk (for now)-  his own country and government impeached him for trying to overturn an election.  What happened was unforgivable. Trump adding a few “non violent”’ legally wise words absolves him of nothing  but back to bbc and uk.  They were correct and now we have Trump threatening to sue for a billion have English people lost all self-respect (that question was answers 9 years ago and is repeated almost daily) 
    • Point is.. top two have quit.. BBC is now what? From being well respected world wide.. not only for news, programs, no idea about pod casts.. Only thing we as a country do well currently is broadcast remembrance service…. Lets face it.. only country that I know of who can release wrong people from jail.. one gave himself up if news is to believed and the other is where? Only country I know of who actually pay people to leave, flights etc and they are back in country .. all heard via Radio 4…  
    • It doesn't matter what channel it was on, how pernicious the subject is and when it happened. Mis-representing the truth in broadcast is not only morally wrong, it's against the OFCOM code of ethics.  Everyone in the industry is trained in how not to do it, most are made to take the BBC's own 'Safeguarding the Trust' course, even if they aren't making BBC programmes.  There wasn't much fuss at the time, because no one knew about it.  "Unless you hate Britain, hate liberals, hate the BBC, want a divided country, support the most powerful person in the world despite his many failings". What the programme makers personally think or feel should never affect how they tell a story; to do so is deeply unprofessional and a sackable offence.  It's the job of the BBC and of all programming to inform viewers of the facts and let them make up their own minds. Even in campaigning documentaries.   
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...