Jump to content

Recommended Posts

The Prime Minister, David Cameron, has said he believes in the "freedom to hunt" and wants fox hunting legalised.


He has said he has "always been a strong supporter of country sports" and that "it is [his] firm belief that people should have the freedom to hunt".


After their majority win in the election on 7th May 2015, the Conservatives will very likely hold a parliamentary vote on repealing the fox hunting ban.


This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but a chance to express any apposing views and sign the petition.


eOizvTZttfGAxoX-800x450-noPad.jpg


https://www.change.org/p/david-cameron-mp-keep-the-ban-on-fox-hunting-2


DulwichFox Protecting our precious wild life.

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but a

> chance to express any apposing views and sign the petition.


Not that I really care one way or the other about the subject, but you don't have the right to define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> DulwichFox Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > This is not a thread to discuss Fox Hunting but

> a

> > chance to express any apposing views and sign

> the petition.

>

> Not that I really care one way or the other about

> the subject, but you don't have the right to

> define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.


This subject has been discussed to death. If you want to Resurrect an old thread or start a new one

please feel to do so.


This thread has been raised to raise awareness of the current Petition to the Government.


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-----------------------------------------------------

>

> Not that I really care one way or the other about

> the subject, but you don't have the right to

> define who can and can't add to the thread, Foxy.



Regardless of what can/can't be added to the thread, I'm so intrigued about something, I'm asking anyway:


Loz, WHY don't you care?

Don't personally understand how anyone in the 21st century can seriously be pro anything that involves murdering an innocent animal for the fun of it, then spending most of your time complaining about your human rights when you've been banned from partaking in this so called "sport". This shouldn't been be on the agenda for reconsideration, it was abolished for a reason.


Louisa.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------


> Regardless of what can/can't be added to the thread, I'm so intrigued about something, I'm asking anyway:

>

> Loz, WHY don't you care?


Because it is argument packed with complete losers on both sides. One side, some well meaning animals types who are far outnumbered by idiotic class warriors. The other, some well meaning traditional country types who are far outnumbered by a different type of idiotic class warriors.


A pox on both their houses, frankly.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Clever answer Loz, but just wondering which side you would be on.

> The victimised fox or the murderous sicko's?


> Or the no idea, don't have a clue, sitting on the fencers?


I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I care on the subject. As I said, I find too many morons on both side of the argument to want to take sides.

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > Clever answer Loz, but just wondering which side

> you would be on.

> > The victimised fox or the murderous sicko's?

>

> > Or the no idea, don't have a clue, sitting on

> the fencers?

>

> I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> morons on both side of the argument to want to

> take sides.


If you do not care one way or the other then why don't you look for another thread to hi-jack.

It's something you seem to be very good at.


Like I said this thread is to bring attention to a petition for people who do care to be able to participate.


and that's all it is....


DulwichFox

Loz Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> aquarius moon Wrote:

> ---------------------

>

> I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> morons on both side of the argument to want to

> take sides.



It's not about moron people, it's about the FOX!


If you care about them being ripped to shreds, or if you don't.


If you really don't care, have a think about it from the fox's side. How can you not care? Unbelievable.


Do you have pets? Dogs, cats, foxes, all feel you know.

aquarius moon Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Loz Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > aquarius moon Wrote:

> > ---------------------

> >

> > I'm not sure you are really grasping how little I

> > care on the subject. As I said, I find too many

> > morons on both side of the argument to want to

> > take sides.

>

>

> It's not about moron people, it's about the FOX!

>

> If you care about them being ripped to shreds, or if you don't.

>

> If you really don't care, have a think about it

> from the fox's side. How can you not care?

> Unbelievable.

>

> Do you have pets? Dogs, cats, foxes, all feel you know.


I've seen rabbits with myxomatosis (highly unpleasant) and foxes that were not taken out with a clean shot and almost certainly died in much pain. Other ways of animal control like snares are even worse. Rat poison causes them to bleed internally until they die.


So why only fox hunting with dogs? This is the crux of what I don't get. This is why I feel that it's just a class issue, hijacking an animal issue. And if it's just a class issue, then, yes, I don't care.

It's not a class issue though is it?


And you know how I feel. Snares, rat poison, any blood sport (fox/deer hunting, hare coursing, shooting) turns my stomach.


I would ban it all but this thread is about fox hunting.


I'd even ban mouse traps. But a living creature being chased, terrifed, then torn into bits while still alive and screaming in pain?


Think about it.

Loz I am in shock at your sheer splitting of hairs over this issue. Any form of cruelty is wrong surely? we are all animals, we all feel pain. You seem to be bypassing the cruelty aspect and refering to some bizarre class issue.


That reminds me, as an aside, hands off greedy that's historically my beef.


Louisa.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • That's the milquetoast triangulation that's delivered so much electoral success to the Lib Dems locally and nationally! 🤣
    • Amazing. Now could you cut and paste an AI summary of the defence case for Andrew M-W? 
    • I would like to understand this promise by the Greens in greater detail and how it applies locally? Presumably road/pavement upkeep and renewal is as important for cyclists and pedestrians as motorists? I am not aware of plans to build new roads locally but there has been plenty of money spent on converting roads into pedestrian only areas. On the face of it this feels a slightly empty statement, when applied at local level. I'd love to know the Greens stance in hiring out parks for private use (given impact on park environment), I'd also like to understand their stance on fireworks- I will look to see if I can find anything. I don't know if a manifesto exists under the documents section of Southwark Greens, but you can only access that bit by signing in- which is disappointing. If anyone has a manifesto that reflects local priorities- could they post a link?
    • You are most likely correct in thinking that  Kinnock, Blair, Brown, Starmer et all knew it.  But they obviously thought that his skills, abilities and usefulness far outweighed the negatives. Here is a summary of the positives lifted from elsewhere:-   1. Strategic Architect: He was a primary architect of "New Labour," rebranding the party and shifting its core ideology to win the 1997 general election. 2 Master of Communication: Often called the original "spin doctor," he revolutionised how political parties manage the media. He famously created the "grid" system to coordinate government messaging. 3 Networking and Charm: Known as "Silvertongue," he possesses a peerless ability to charm and network with high-level global figures, including business leaders and heads of state. 4. Governance and Trade Expertise: Beyond strategy, he was considered a highly efficient minister, serving as European Commissioner for Trade and Secretary of State across multiple departments, including Business and Northern Ireland.  5. Reinvention: His capacity to adapt to changing political climates and rebuild relationships reflects personal resilience and strategic flexibility. With his skill and abilities, he delivered results for all his bosses. In the short time in Washington, he found a way to get on the right side of Trump - despite him  being critical of Trump in previous years. That said he is complex personality.  He can be simultaneously brilliant and arrogant, thick-skinned yet sensitive, and selfless for his party while appearing narcissistic in his personal dealings.  My OP asked if he would be accepted over the pond. It turned out he was because he got on famously with trump. He worked out the correct strategy to get on the good side of Trump and secured a better trade deal than the EU and other nations.    
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...