Jump to content

Recommended Posts

red devil Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQm, don't you think it might have been locked

> because it was only a matter of time before it

> ended up as Debating, disagreeing, arguing,

> swearing, falling out, calling names, nasty,

> nasty, nastier.?...



And? Aren't we allowed to then? They are all allowed to do it on the general election thread, house buying threads, cycling threads etc etc, but we are banned from doing so on this one?

I'm getting so sick of this forum. Most of the threads are of no interest to me, then something is, and I'm not allowed to speak.

Past caring really. I was going to post on the predictor thread earlier but am so used to talking to myself on there, I didn't bother.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox hunting".

>

> The Fox's wish has been granted.


I think *Bob* is onto something here. It was such a strange thing for DC to do, maybe, just maybe, Foxy asked for it.

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any

> debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox

> hunting".

>

> The Fox's wish has been granted.


Again *Bob* you are wrong . WRONG.


I did not say I only wanted supporting views.. I wasn't looking for ANY views. I said no debate.


Again.. It was just a link to a petition for people who wanted to sign it.


I could not of made it easier to understand.


The thread was in the LOUNGE. Where all the 'Bad' guys are sent. It should not of been closed.


It was closed because of some ones personal political view.


Like anyone who respects and supports Animal Liberty /rights has to be some kind of Radical 'Lefty' Anarchist.


DulwichFox

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If that is the case foxy then it really does

> confirm my opinion about the direction of this

> forum.

>

> Louisa.



Me too.

I knew that Foxy wouldn't have done that.

I have an idea who it might have been.

And like I said in an earlier post, if I'm not allowed to have an opinion on the very few threads that I have an opinion on, I just won't bother posting anymore.

I was bundled into the lounge for having an opinion too. Admin claimed it was because they wish to create a friendly atmosphere with no negativity. But from what I see of a large chunk of General Issues is a semi permanent home for a cluster of middle class nut jobs living in ivory towers. Hardly friendly is it? Oh unless you're part of the club.


ED circa 2015.


Louisa.

david_carnell Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> *Bob* Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> > AQ Foxy specifically said he didn't want any

> > debate on the thread, only supporting views. I

> > quote "this is not a thread to discuss fox

> > hunting".

> >

> > The Fox's wish has been granted.

>

> This



Sorry DC. I don't buy that. Foxy didn't ask for it, someone else obviously did.

I don't care now anyway. If I'm not allowed an opinion, I'll keep you all happy and shut up.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • https://www.standard.co.uk/news/crime/police-hunt-attack-south-london-b1247389.html Apologies if already posted on here - did look, couldn't find anything... 'The Metropolitan Police have appealed for help to find a man after a woman was seriously injured in an unprovoked attack in south London. The woman, in her 20s, was assaulted on Lordship Lane in East Dulwich at around 4.45pm on Monday August 25. She was treated by paramedics for injuries to her face and her jaw was broken in the attack. The victim was then taken to hospital and she continues to be supported by specialist officers. Officers are now searching for the suspect and are urging members of the public to come forward if they have information. He is described as a black man in his 30s or 40s with balding hair. He was wearing dark clothing during the attack. He is said to have approached the woman while she was by herself before swearing at her and then hitting her in the face. Detective constable Charlotte Kerr, who is leading the investigation, said: “We are working hard to find the person we believe is responsible for this senseless and unprovoked attack. “While we continue our enquiries, we hope our increased neighbourhood police presence will offer some reassurance to women and girls throughout the local area. “If you saw anything on Monday, 25 August – particularly between the junction of Lordship Lane and Chesterfield Grove at around 16:45hrs - do not hesitate to get in touch with us. “No matter how small you think your information is, it may be the key that unlocks our investigation.” Any witnesses or anyone who can help identify the suspect is asked to please contact the Met via 101, quoting 5018/25AUG or 01/7897951/25. Those who wish to share information anonymously can contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111.'
    • I think, with schools, you really have to find the one that suits your child, rather than moving to a school catchment and then hoping it works. Mine both went to a high ranking and covetable school and had very different experiences - one loved it and the other was bullied and traumatised, and hated it. WE actually moved away because she couldn't walk around the area (yes - Dulwich area, so one of the local schools).
    • We live a little further down, on Pymers Mead. Traffic is terrible (always has been, but worse since the introduction of the Southwark LTNs). It's mainly the school drop -- traffic is noticeably lighter once the private schools break up  Have a few friends who live on that side of CR backing on to the train line. None has had any major complaints and the gardens on that stretch are fairly long, so you're not right on the line. Some have kids who go to Charter North -- its catchment defintely extends to Croxted Road. Other state secondaries nearby are Elmgreen and, of course, Kingsdale, although that doesn't have a catchment -- pure lottery
    • Hi. Does anyone know of a silver making jewellery workshop. I am trying to find something nice for my daughter’s 18th birthday.l for her and some friends but everything I find online is too pricey or can’t accommodate 10 girls. Thanks 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...