Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I see your point, but when a thread discussing the opening time of shops on Lordship Lane becomes a discussion about Nazis I think there's a point. I've already seen one flaw in your law Alan, the Administrator is not there to win debates, he/she's there to sensibly administer the forum where possible and using Godwin's law can just be used as a prop to drive home their point about going off topic.


The TV episodes you mention are not strictly internet discussion boards so they would not be prohibited by this law.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13778
Share on other sites

Just to recap a bit of history, the Nazi party took over Germany via a violent rigged election, then banned all rival political parties. They systematically shut down all voices of opposition, killing journalists, creating Nazi churches, and exiling academics. While gearing up for a war of conquest, they introduced eugenics into their school system, took all rights away from Jews, and brutalized other non-Germans. For dessert they launched a six-year war that killed millions of people, enslaved millions more, and systematically exterminated entire ethnic groups before retreating to a bunker and demanding their citizens commit mass suicide.*


It's down to personal opinion if they want to compare Nazis to traffic wardens but it shouldn't really water down the facts as to what they did.


Anyway you can be assured the law will only be used on extreme cases, mainly to drive the point home that threads go off topic. Like you say what matters here is East Dulwich and the local people, hence the Lounge for discussion about other things non-East Dulwich.



*(reason magazine)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13789
Share on other sites

apologies if you mis-read that, I wasn't aiming it at you, it was directed at the people in the pub you mention who use the term Nazi lightly. Got a bit heavy there didn't I.


To be honest GL will probably not be used again on this site, but I'm sure that Alan Dale's Law will one day find a use.


[edited once]

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13795
Share on other sites

A bit over the top there Mr Dale.

Godwin's Law was brought up by me once it had indeed come into effect in an interminable thread about women only sessions that had really died a natural death weeks before but had been ressurected.


I used it in a humourous fashion but was glad when the Administrator saw it as the last call, after many others, to bury the thread once and for all. I think that was it's only application as far as I know.


Shouldn't this be in About This Forum anyway, the lounge is supposed to be fun. Or are you just having fun Alan ;-p

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13806
Share on other sites

*holds hands up*


I stated that It was the shopkeepers who elected hitler so I am the one who provoked this Godwins law stuff I presume - post now deleted - obviously they were not the only ones who voted for him,, but their "class" were the ones who embraced the new regime after being kicked about during Weimar and the inlationary period of the previous decade.There . ve said my piece.


anyway...........

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13875
Share on other sites

Ok fair enough.


I think Godwin's Law has it's place as many forums are less than reasonable places and often frequented by younguns without a decent sense of perspective or americans, or both which is of course the worst of all possible worlds.


I left the thisislondon forums a long long time ago for the above reasons, mind you they were mostly adults and British and should have known better frankly.


This place is infinitely more reasonable and is anyway not really prone to the sort of left vs right type arguments that end up in ridiculous claims, comparisons etc. It only ever seems to be between salt o'the earth v ponces & chavs v reasonable people & originals v blowins & Nero v starbucks varieties, none of which lend themselves particularly to Nazi comparisons.


I'm fine with no Godwin (not that it's my decision) as I only brought it in humourously (I *do* think it's funny) but maybe it can be reassessed if the dynamic of the forum changes significantly at some point.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13914
Share on other sites

Godwin's Law is a manifestation of the concept of 'reductio ad absurdum' - the fact that extending a logical argument to the point that it delivers an 'absurd' conclusion renders the original argument invalid.


In this example perhaps (I didn't see the original exchange) comparing shopkeepers with Hitler was absurd.


Godwin's Law doesn't assume that every mention of Hitler is absurd, it just challenges the absence of rational thought that could draw such hyperbolic conclusions in inappropriate debates.


Hence in principle it's not something that's imposed from the outside in, it's a humiliation that the debater heaps upon him/herself.


Hence to hate Godwin's Law is strictly speaking to hate making a fool of yourself - nobody likes that, but most of us have the presence of mind not to blame someone else for it. Except me of course :))


Indeed we should be thanking administrators worldwide for covering up the moments of madness that would otherwise live in perpetuity to soil our reputations! I, for one, thank my lucky stars we have such a philanthropic bunch... ;-)

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13941
Share on other sites

Ooh, fisking....light the blue touch paper Mr Dale.


Of course if i was going to start fisking too I could posit that you lost the argument and brought in Godwins law with:


>>I could call the administrator a 'plantation overseer' but not a 'death camp guard'.


in order to challenge that Godwin's law is there to stop absurd use of metaphor/simile, but I'm not going to do that, don't worry ;-P

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13957
Share on other sites

Huguenot is well up there with you for banning this one, proposed it, but got neighed.

As a response format it used by a lot of usenetty type people long before fisking as a concept. So no go there.


I occasionally fisk on my political circular but am deeply ashamed everytime i do it, sadly sometimes it's very difficult not to.


Don't give up hope Mr Dale!!

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13968
Share on other sites

Mockers, me ol' china, you kno fule well that I believe that there are significant benefits in fisking for those for whom entering "rational debate or building a coherent argument" can be a challenge.


Not really ;-)


What's disappointing about fisking is that it's essentially parasitic. In its execution it dismembers constructive and considered discourse into broken phrases stripped of meaning and context. It rarely contributes to debate. I remember when Louisiana last did it to me she complained that she couldn't make sense of my argument - well she certainly wouldn't after fisking it into something resembling rabbit pellets.


It's the literary equivalent of telling everyone else their plans for the Christmas Party are shit, whilst deiberately avoiding punting up any ideas yourself. ::o


It looks clever, but underneath it everyone knows...

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13976
Share on other sites

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

>

> What's disappointing about fisking is that it's

> essentially parasitic.


That's your opinion and you're entitled to it


> In its execution it

> dismembers constructive and considered discourse

> into broken phrases stripped of meaning and

> context.


of course this depends on which side you're batting for


> It rarely contributes to debate.


Again, that's your opinion and you're entitled to it


>I remember when Louisiana last did it to me she

> complained that she couldn't make sense of my

> argument - well she certainly wouldn't after

> fisking it into something resembling rabbit

> pellets.


need I say more when you reduce the debate to rabbit pellets


> It's the literary equivalent of telling everyone

> else their plans for the Christmas Party are shit,

> whilst deliberately avoiding punting up any ideas

> yourself. ::o


What do you expect? It's not one's job's to organise but to discuss and if required to criticise (should that be necessary for the greater good of myself)


> It looks clever, but underneath it everyone

> knows...


you're the one

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-13994
Share on other sites

Gentlemen. Might I suggest you follow the example of the needlewomen of this parish and set up your own society. Perhaps the ED Union where you can dress up as 18th C gentlemen and debate in style. You might wish to contact the English Speaking Union who will, I'm sure, be happy to advise on your initial meeting, administrative posts etc.
Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/594-godwins-law/#findComment-14000
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Hey Sue, I was wrong - I don't think it would just be for foreign tourists. So yeah I assume that, if someone lives in Lewisham and wants to say the night in southwark, they'd pay a levy.  The hotels wouldn't need to vet anyone's address or passports - the levy is automatically added on top of the bill by every hotel / BnB / hostel and passed on to Southwark. So basically, you're paying an extra two quid a night, or whatever, to stay in this borough.  It's a great way to drive footfall... to the other London boroughs.  https://www.ukpropertyaccountants.co.uk/uk-tourist-tax-exploring-the-rise-of-visitor-levies-and-foreign-property-charges/
    • Pretty much, Sue, yeah. It's the perennial, knotty problem of imposing a tax and balancing that with the cost of collecting it.  The famous one was the dog licence - I think it was 37 1/2 pence when it was abolished, but the revenue didn't' come close to covering the administration costs. As much I'd love to have a Stasi patrolling the South Bank, looking for mullet haircuts, unshaven armpits, overly expressive hand movements and red Kicker shoes, I'm afraid your modern Continental is almost indistinguishable from your modern Londoner. That's Schengen for you. So you couldn't justify it from an ROI point of view, really. This scheme seems a pretty good idea, overall. It's not perfect, but it's cheap to implement and takes some tax burden off Southwark residents.   'The Man' has got wise to this. It's got bad juju now. If you're looking to rinse medium to large amounts of small denomination notes, there are far better ways. Please drop me a direct message if you'd like to discuss this matter further.   Kind Regards  Dave
    • "What's worse is that the perceived 20 billion black hole has increased to 30 billion in a year. Is there a risk that after 5 years it could be as high as 70 billion ???" Why is it perceived, Reeves is responsible for doubling the "black hole" to £20b through the public sector pay increases. You can't live beyond your means and when you try you go bankrupt pdq. In 4 yrs time if this Govt survives that long and the country doesn't go bust before then, in 2029 I dread to think the state the country will be in.  At least Sunak and co had inflation back to 2% with unemployment being stable and not rising.   
    • He seemed to me to be fully immersed in the Jeremy Corbyn ethos of the Labour Party. I dint think that (and self describing as a Marxist) would have helped much when Labour was changed under Starmer. There was a purge of people as far left as him that he was lucky to survive once in my opinion.   Stuff like this heavy endorsement of Momentum and Corbyn. It doesn't wash with a party that is in actual government.   https://labourlist.org/2020/04/forward-momentum-weve-launched-to-change-it-from-the-bottom-up/
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...