Jump to content

Recommended Posts

I wasn't present but I've just been speaking to a friend of mine who yesterday in Downham witnessed something sick. he was walking his dog who's a fully grown male German shepherd in Forster park in Downham when a group of lttle shits set their Staff/Bulldog/extention of their dick on his dog Jess. His two sons Bill and Louis were present and thankfully Jess killed his opponent. When the police arrived they were naturally suspicious that an organised dog fight had been arranged but after talking to witnesses it had become apparent that something sinister but becomeing more common had happened. Basically, for a laugh these 'people' take a dangerous dog to the park and find a more or less equal opponent. Place bets on which dog is most likely to win or how long their dog will take to kill it's innocent opponents and if theirs looses just walk off! They film the footage on mobile phones and post the footage on underground internet sites for others to 'enjoy'.


Beware.

Link to comment
https://www.eastdulwichforum.co.uk/topic/5980-this-really-is-the-limit/
Share on other sites

Some people are incapable of owning a pet, my sister has a staff cross and I can categorically say that the dog is a wonderful pet there is no malice in him whatsoever hes a bit of a pest because he is so affectionate and wont leave me alone when I visit, hes a good dog it's the owners who ill treat the dogs and make them vicious. I personally would have punched the feckers into the middle of next week, they should be banned from owning any animals.

You will be surprised how many South Londoners from Grove Park/Hither Green/Ladywell walk their dogs in Footscray/Crayford/Oxleas Woods for this very reason.


Alsations are wonderful dogs and I feel so sorry for the victim having these scum for owners.


Like the Guy mentioned in The South London Press, who took his maimed, weak Pit-Bull and pushed it off the nearest tower block accompanied by his leering m8's and then put the remnants in the nearest trash can.


I don't know who I despise the most ..the perpetrators or the Members of The General Public who, effectively, condone this behaviour by doing f+++ all about it....

Most days in the various Parks that I walk with my 4 West Highland Terriers I will speak to 10 different owners about their dogs and almost, unanimously, these owners love their Dogs for the wonderful characters they are and to think these Guys can do this to someones beloved pet sickens me.


I found my mind constantly thinking of this while watching The Chelsea/Liverpool game and I'm so sad that certain members of our Society behave like this...it was never like this b4..never....

Good ol' days eh, TLS? ;-)


The only reason I don't subscribe to capital punishment is because it's not possible to get it right all the time. However, I think that people who would wilfully train a dog to set it on a stranger's pet are demonstrating such a lack of respect for society that they don't deserve to be part of it.

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I think that peoplewho would wilfully train a dog to set it on a

> stranger's pet are demonstrating such a lack of

> respect for society that they don't deserve to be

> part of it.



absolutely . but what do you do with them ?

Huguenot Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Good ol' days eh, TLS? ;-)...:)

>

> The only reason I don't subscribe to capital

> punishment is because it's not possible to get it

> right all the time. However, I think that people

> who would wilfully train a dog to set it on a

> stranger's pet are demonstrating such a lack of

> respect for society that they don't deserve to be

> part of it.


Absolutely H.


These Guys actually get a kick out of it in the same way as some Muggers actually enjoy inflicting violence long after the robbery has occurred.


Its as if the situation has got to deterioriate to a new nadir b4 something is done and deterrents are just that.

???? Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> mmmmmmmmmmmm...........so the police aren't aware

> yet it's common. Forgive my slight cyncism BBW

> but a friend etc....



Right Quids since you had difficulty reading/understanding what I posted I'll try my upmost to make it as clear as possible.


I wasn't there and didn't make the call to the authorities but I imagined when they were told a nasty fight between two fully grown/powerful dogs was happening in a public park with small children present they wanted to prevent a human tragedy as swiftly as possible as I'm sure until the full facts were made available everyone present thought that an out of control dog was making to attack to small boys but had been stopped in it's tracks by their dog.


Your comment, 'They weren't aware'. Aware of what?


What I think you're refering to is that a specific type of fight was taking place. Only after talking to witnesses who said that the deceased dog had a group of suspicious looking owners (without uttering the cha...... word I hope you can picture them) that walked/ran off after it had become apparent that their dog was onto a loser they abandoned him whilst my friend and owner of the Alsation stayed put and spoke to the Police. I imagine since this type of sport is in it's infancy so to speak I don't think it would be too critical of the cops to say it temporarily sliped under their radar. After talking to several people present they explained the plausible explaination as to what happened. I think that the owners ran off speaks volumes in this case.


I never said it's common. I said from a second hand source that it's 'becomeing common'.


Please get you facts straight before letting cynicism take over.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • Our 10 month old kitten has been missing since this morning from Nutbrook street. I know that's  not that long but he's not well and on medication for diarrhea, vomiting, and eating very little. He only ever goes out back and today he got out the front door, an area he's never been before. He's very good about coming home when you call him but no sign.  Answers to Jeffrey or Jeff.  Please get in touch in you see him as I think he will be very dehydrated very soon. 
    • A Google search brought up eleven Chango  branches, although they don't all seem to be listed on their website. In the order they came up: East Dulwich, Clapham Common, Mayfair, Wandsworth, City of London, Wimbledon,  Parsons Green, Kensington, Highgate, Richmond, Hampstead. I think it is the positioning of this new branch that has mostly got to me. I accept that they would have to go for where a space became vacant, but Lordship Lane is pretty long, even just the part with shops in,  and choosing to  open a stone's throw away from Chacarero seems mean, to say the least. I wonder if they have made contact with Chacarero. It would be nice to think they had (in a friendly way, obviously!) As regards the apparent  marketing spiel, at least one of the online reviewers also refers to a Chango branch (the Parsons Green one in this case) as a "gem". Probably just coincidence and a word in common use to describe such places. I wouldn't know. I'm ancient 🤣
    • I like empanadas. I don't think Chango is a massive chain - it's got a few stores all in London I believe (stand to be corrected if I've got that wrong). I don't see a problem with them opening on the Lane personally. I really like Chacarero, but that doesn't mean that they should be immune from competition - if they're successful and open a couple more stores, are we then meant to stop supporting them for being a 'chain'?  That opening post does sound a lot like marketing spiel though. Is the OP perhaps connected to the new business I wonder?
    • According to what I can see online, Dynamic Vines and Cave de Bruno sell totally different kinds of wine to each other.  Dynamic Vines  "work with independent winemakers who produce outstanding wine using sustainable practices in the vineyard and minimal intervention in the cellar".  Cave de Bruno specialises in French wines and spirits from small independent producers. So two different USPs, and no doubt two different but overlapping customer bases who can afford these wines. Probably different again to the people mainly  shopping for wine at Majestic or the Co op. On the other hand, the two empanada shops appear on the face of it to be selling virtually identical products. But time will tell, won't it? Let's see how they are both doing in - say - a couple of years' time. Impossible, of course, to compare that with how they would have done if there had been only one of them. I just feel more  sorry for the original one than for  the one which can apparently already afford to have a number of shops in places like Mayfair and Highgate. I'm tempted to buy something there every week, and I don't even like that kind of pastry 🤣
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...