Jump to content

Recommended Posts

There was a Ray who drank in the Palmie who was commonly known as Razors, not, I think because he was handy with a cut throat but because he rarely shaved. He was also referred to sometimes as the 'old man'. I would on occasion score a bit of puff off him. Nice fella.

Fox - nobody is bullying you.


It's simple. You and Louisa have it all in your power* to bring more to this forum than the constant repetition of veiled gentrification critique that so many (old ED residents and new) have had enough of.


*anything else at all would be welcome and would make things more readable for all.


You have both failed to acknowledge my earlier offer and so I will double it - ?200 split between charities of your choice if you can both resist any more gentrification change related topics /trolling for at least the next 6 months...

DulwichFox Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> I'm beginning to feel not for the first time

> That Louisa and myself are the only 2 people

> Here on EDF that really remember what

> E.D was really like.

> I have clear memories of most if not All pubs in

> The area going back 35 years

>

> Foxy


No, you're not.

MrBen are you suggesting we just brush gentrification under the carpet? If it's a crucial issue which determines so much about our neighborhood how can we just ignore its effects? I do not only talk about this topic, I've got form talking about other interests such as spiritualism, history, alcohol consumption, to name but a few. I even suggested yesterday that some of the new things have been good for the area (eg more pedestrian crossings and cleaner streets, tidy front gardens).


What more can I physically do?


Louisa.

Jeremy Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Forresters was better than the Bishop cos you

> could use the pool cues to bash your mates over

> the head. Them was the days.



It was better than The Bishop because The Bishop is shit.


And that's not anti gentrification, that's just me thinking the Bishop is shit. Basically all fur coat and no knickers. Scratch the surface and it's the foresters with higher prices.

I like the Bishop. There, I've said it...mostly there from lunch till 6 on a Saturday though (Later I dont think I'd like it). I like sitting outside when the suns out, watching the world go by. I've moved away so not there as often as once was, but its my starting point when i'm back through. Then head toward Peckham..

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> If you genuinely believe I link pizza to the

> serious issue of gentrification then I'm not the

> only one who's barking round these here parts!


Then why do you go on about it all the time!


To have a bit of a laugh and wind a few people up?


Exactly..

Louisa Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Don't you personally think it's a shame Otta, that

> when you're back down this end, you can't go to

> old haunts because they've changed so drastically?

> The CPT had so many characters over the years and

> the Great Exhibition just feels soulless.

>

> Louisa.




I don't know that "shame" is the right word. I do know what you're saying, and I do miss the great times that I had in the CPT, but the fact is that the people are gone (either moved away or dead), so if the CPT was back tomorrow there would be no one in there.


But yeah, TGE is not my bag, but they seem to have found enough people that want to eat their Sunday lunch with some jazz, so good luck to them. (bunch of wrong'uns)

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even The Palace of Peace has gone. Were you ever

> in there Louisa or DF? Would have made a change

> from a pub fight.


I went in there once. They thought I was one of the chosen ones. I quickly got out of there before a cult formed around me.

Doesn't this just translate to:

1. From my memory I reckon I had a great time back in the day.

2. You lot who haven't lived round here as long as me will never understand that.

3. Only I can really appreciate the way things were, once, according to my memory.

4. No matter how much you like ED at the moment, my memory tells me that it was better back in my day, according to my memory, regardless of who you are and what you know.

5. The best time has gone and all that's left is shit.

6. I am unable to move on, times have changed, but I cannot and will not adapt to it.

7. I can blurt-out whatever I like to talk-up the past / put-down the present, but you can't challenge my view, because you're not me and only I know the truth.

8. You're all wrong and I'm all right.

9. If you challenge me then you're a bully and part of a clique.

10 If you challenge me have no grounds to do so because you're not me.

11. Back to 1. And Repeat. Ad Infinitum.

Alan Medic Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Even The Palace of Peace has gone. Were you ever

> in there Louisa or DF? Would have made a change

> from a pub fight.


The Palace of Peace ?? Oh yes .. I gave the guy running it all my worldly goods and life savings

in exchange for a Spiritual Cleansing.. Eternal Devine Thoughts (EDT) and some free joss sticks.


MMhhhm (EDT) So that's where the name came from...


Devine Fox. Sounds Good.

Palace of Peace...


It was a scam. Guy (Guru) was a fraudster...


Way back in 1974 when London had the highest premie population of any city in the world the word got down to Oztralia that Utopia had already manifested there by the Grace of Prem Pal Singh Rawat.


Unfortunately when Rawat sent David Lovejoy to England to enjoy that utopia he found there was very little love and joy and a mountain of debt.


So he fired everbody that could be fired and sold everything that could be sold and then he saw the light, moved back to Australia and never practiced Knowledge again. Some of you may have been in that blissful utopia.


http://prem-rawat-talk.org/cgi-bin/anyboard.cgi/forum?cmd=iYz&aK=57652&iZz=57652&gV=0&kQz=&aO=1&iWz=0



Foxy

*Bob* Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> Otta Wrote:

> --------------------------------------------------

> -----

> Basically all fur coat and no knickers.

>

>

> I've never really understood this phrase. What's

> wrong with a fur coat and no knickers? Sounds like

> a winning combo to me.



Haha, it's one of the phrases (along with "have a word with yourself" that I've inherited from the wife.


Personally I prefer no coat and fur knickers. Keeps things snug.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • bizarre responses from everyone but Cancerian 🤷🏾‍♀️ As an LL resident surely a perfectly normal enquiry in that one might wish to know who to look out for if lawless/feral kids are wreaking havoc? any distinguishing marks on the perpetrators? presumably the objection is that a physical description might reveal the alleged culprits as non-white? (nothing else makes sense with this bourgeois over-sensitivity). same botched thinking that causes police descriptions of suspects on the loose to omit this info  (top way to protect the public / solve the crime) FYI i'm a mixed-race female and interested in THE TRUTH. hence, i want to protect myself & my family against criminals. so please DESCRIBE the physical appearance of criminals or suspected criminals to help to keep us safe. thankyou.  "underlying agenda... strange" 😂😂😂 strange agenda to wish to be safe in my community. well played 🤯   working the nightshift here & getting mildly obsessed/infuriated with the peculiar responses. someone please explain how wishing to be able to attempt to identify, physically, the perpetrator(s) of an alleged local assault is "strange", with an "agenda"? God help us. (wait... "God"? must be a far-right religious maniac) "Unless there were distinctive features such as unusual clothing, how is that going to identify them"... green & purple mohican with accompanying buffalo 🦬 horns through the nose might do it; or simply hairstyle, skin colour, sartorial outfit... 🤔 "and even if it did, what would be the point, without photographic evidence that they had done anything wrong?" eyewitness reports? 😏    
    • Unless they were wearing school uniform with name tags otherwise children do change their clothes you know. 
    • I'd also recommend Silvano for anyone in the area looking to learn automatic, having just passed first time with 5 minors. He's a very patient teacher and ensured I learned how to drive safely above all. 
    • You don't need to do the research. I had to know the numbers as a TV buyer. I analysed the potential advertising revenue and Channel Four didn't cover their costs. They had some nice 'Channel Four' signs when someone hit the ropes but, In all honesty, a lot a potential revenue was lost because most old knackers were pissed off because they couldn't perve at Carol Vorderman on 'Countdown'.       Sorry, cross-post. I was replying to Malumbu. Give me a minute, if you will. I listened to the first two sessions (today) on TMS and popped down to the pub for the evening one.   I do miss the days of Peter West, Richie Benaud and Tom Graveney on BBC2.   But, the BBC are at least putting on 'Today At The Test' on at around 7pm instead of after midnight.   And it was on the 10pm news.      
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...