Jump to content

Recommended Posts

shorts are fine when wearing jandals , but to wear 3/4 lenghts with shoes of any description is so so wrong.


I have some very sad looking fashionless victims in the pub garden today.


There is, on a good note , a group of young ladies from the language school up the road who have thought nothing of stripping to their bikini top / bra to get a bit of sun.


just about made me choke on my cucumber sandwiches!!!


Im gonna miss this pub garden.

Ahhh ok.

Tit Monday is what I think of as Beep-Beep-Wayhay-Day.


You know, the first warm spring day when males drivers (usually, but not exclusively, white van driver*) just can't resist tooting their horns and shouting at every woman they pass.


*by which I mean drivers of white vans not white drivers, obviously, before anyone starts anything.

Mmmmm, from top to toe indeed - I must say I go weak at the sight of men in sandals.

In fact I think I have in the past dated men precisely on that quality - neglecting to spot the overgrown facial hair at the time, so obsessed was I with their toes.


But then I have kissed many frogs - and little wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear? Open toad sandals of course!

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But then I have kissed many frogs - and little

> wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear?

> Open toad sandals of course!


That's the male frogs BB, the stylish girl frogs won't be seen in anything but Ribbit-O Cavalli.

It's true, I read it in Frogue.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh come on 3/4 lengths at least are much better

> than ankle swingers (for those who don't

> understand that concept - ill-fitting trousers

> that ride above the ankle displaying sock, skin,

> hair and shoe). That is just WRONG!


Accidental ankle swingers are no shame, they and their owner just can't help it.

They are blameless innocents such as geaography teachers or urchins and should be viewed with benign tolerance.

The wearer of 3/4 length trousers sets out with malice aforethought to offend and spread dismay.

He is the worst sort of poltroon and should be cut by the county.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • You literally just edited your earlier reply to remove the point you made about it being “politicians”.  Then you call me pathetic.    I’m  not trying to say you approve any of the ugly right wing nonsense.  But I AM Saying your earlier post suggesting  violent rhetoric being “left wing” was one-sided and incorrect 
    • I never said that. Saying I don’t like some of the rhetoric coming from the left doesn’t mean I approve of Farage et al saying that Afghans being brought here to protect their lives and thank them for their service means there is an incalculable threat to women.    Anything to score a cheap point. It’s pretty pathetic. 
    • To be fair we are as hosed as the majority of other countries post-Covid. The problem is Labour promised way too much and leant in on the we need change and we will deliver it and it was clear to anyone with a modicum of sense that no change was going to happen quickly and actually taking the reigns may have been a massive poison- chalice. As Labour are finding to their cost - there are no easy answers.  A wealth tax seems straightforward but look how Labour have U-turned on elements of non-dom - why? Because the super rich started leaving the country in their droves and whilst we all may want them to pay more tax they already pay a big chunk already and the government saw there was a problem.
    • You don’t think there are right-wing politicians fanning this with rhetoric? Really? 
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...