Jump to content

Tit Monday

MrBen

By MrBen
in The Lounge

 Share

Recommended Posts

BigPhil

BigPhil

Posted
Posted

shorts are fine when wearing jandals , but to wear 3/4 lenghts with shoes of any description is so so wrong.


I have some very sad looking fashionless victims in the pub garden today.


There is, on a good note , a group of young ladies from the language school up the road who have thought nothing of stripping to their bikini top / bra to get a bit of sun.


just about made me choke on my cucumber sandwiches!!!


Im gonna miss this pub garden.

annaj

annaj

Posted
Posted

Ahhh ok.

Tit Monday is what I think of as Beep-Beep-Wayhay-Day.


You know, the first warm spring day when males drivers (usually, but not exclusively, white van driver*) just can't resist tooting their horns and shouting at every woman they pass.


*by which I mean drivers of white vans not white drivers, obviously, before anyone starts anything.

Bellenden Belle

Bellenden Belle

Posted
Posted

Mmmmm, from top to toe indeed - I must say I go weak at the sight of men in sandals.

In fact I think I have in the past dated men precisely on that quality - neglecting to spot the overgrown facial hair at the time, so obsessed was I with their toes.


But then I have kissed many frogs - and little wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear? Open toad sandals of course!

HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But then I have kissed many frogs - and little

> wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear?

> Open toad sandals of course!


That's the male frogs BB, the stylish girl frogs won't be seen in anything but Ribbit-O Cavalli.

It's true, I read it in Frogue.

HonaloochieB

HonaloochieB

Posted
Posted

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh come on 3/4 lengths at least are much better

> than ankle swingers (for those who don't

> understand that concept - ill-fitting trousers

> that ride above the ankle displaying sock, skin,

> hair and shoe). That is just WRONG!


Accidental ankle swingers are no shame, they and their owner just can't help it.

They are blameless innocents such as geaography teachers or urchins and should be viewed with benign tolerance.

The wearer of 3/4 length trousers sets out with malice aforethought to offend and spread dismay.

He is the worst sort of poltroon and should be cut by the county.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
  • Advertise Here

  • Latest Discussions

    • HeadNun
      Cyclist visibility

      By HeadNun · Posted

      If the cyclist wasn't wearing lights and hi viz, did it really happen..........?
    • HeadNun
      The Telegraph and the other right wing media, do they hate Britain?

      By HeadNun · Posted

      I don't think anyone here is claiming the Torygraph is the paragon of good reporting, or impartiality. I was referring to media organisations across the spectrum, and I opened it wide up, way beyond the BBC.  But, to your point, if you're making a programme about abortion, say, you're not going to interview the man/woman on the street with a moderate view, you're always going to go to the people at the extreme ends, that's the point of the exercise, right? And most people watching innately know what's objectively right and wrong, because mainly they're decent people who've had the privilege of growing up in a liberal, free-thinking, tolerant democracy.  There have always been despicable people, and there always will be. Things feel worse at the moment because of the immediacy of media, but maybe they aren't. One day, Trump will be a blip in history and everyone will be consumed with the next big problem. Probably a genocidal robot.   
    • Angelina
      Cyclist visibility

      By Angelina · Posted

      If a pedestrian gets hit by a bike, it can be very serious. All it takes is someone not spotting a cyclist coming up at speed.    Clearly, no one wants a collision. so let’s just make it easier to be seen and for everyone to be safe. Bike lights (front and back), helmet lights, reflective strips on your backpack, high visibility clips on the ankles, wrists, lights on your spikes… it’s not hard and it shouldn’t be expensive. I’m just wondering if cyclists haven’t yet adjusted to the darker evenings and don’t actually realise. Perhaps cyclists don’t drive but would benefit from doing so and seeing what it’s like from a drivers point of view.  All cars had lights on.  One of the Boris bikes didn’t, it must have been broken as I thought they were automatic.
    • Blah Blah
      GALA 2026

      By Blah Blah · Posted

      The other thing is that the money the council makes from the festival is not spent in the local area, whereas money made from events in other parks are. Renata Hamvas would have to approve any change to the premises licence before the events team can consider a license for the proposal in the current form. There needs to be an organised local pushback this time, to at least stop that second weekend being granted. I am thinking along the lines of a door to door petition. There are local elections next May. Lot's of opportunity to make this an election issue for impacted wards around the park. Just need to be orgaised. 

East Dulwich Forum

Established in 2006, we are an online community discussion forum for people who live, work in and visit SE22.

Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...