Jump to content

Recommended Posts

shorts are fine when wearing jandals , but to wear 3/4 lenghts with shoes of any description is so so wrong.


I have some very sad looking fashionless victims in the pub garden today.


There is, on a good note , a group of young ladies from the language school up the road who have thought nothing of stripping to their bikini top / bra to get a bit of sun.


just about made me choke on my cucumber sandwiches!!!


Im gonna miss this pub garden.

Ahhh ok.

Tit Monday is what I think of as Beep-Beep-Wayhay-Day.


You know, the first warm spring day when males drivers (usually, but not exclusively, white van driver*) just can't resist tooting their horns and shouting at every woman they pass.


*by which I mean drivers of white vans not white drivers, obviously, before anyone starts anything.

Mmmmm, from top to toe indeed - I must say I go weak at the sight of men in sandals.

In fact I think I have in the past dated men precisely on that quality - neglecting to spot the overgrown facial hair at the time, so obsessed was I with their toes.


But then I have kissed many frogs - and little wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear? Open toad sandals of course!

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But then I have kissed many frogs - and little

> wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear?

> Open toad sandals of course!


That's the male frogs BB, the stylish girl frogs won't be seen in anything but Ribbit-O Cavalli.

It's true, I read it in Frogue.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh come on 3/4 lengths at least are much better

> than ankle swingers (for those who don't

> understand that concept - ill-fitting trousers

> that ride above the ankle displaying sock, skin,

> hair and shoe). That is just WRONG!


Accidental ankle swingers are no shame, they and their owner just can't help it.

They are blameless innocents such as geaography teachers or urchins and should be viewed with benign tolerance.

The wearer of 3/4 length trousers sets out with malice aforethought to offend and spread dismay.

He is the worst sort of poltroon and should be cut by the county.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • I'd be tempted to put up some sort of fence  to delineate the area and see what happens. Probably nothing.
    • Poundland have been there just over two years. 
    • Has anybody here bought some land from the council to become part of their garden? There are helpful guidelines on the Southwark website here including a PDF with associated costs, however the "valuation" element has absolutely no guidelines. It could be £500 or £50,000. You will already have spent £1000 on the process before finding out what they will charge you for the land - which would certainly be frustrating if it's not affordable for you. The land in question is a tiny patch immediately attached to the front of my property, approx 4 meters wide x 1 meter long. Would like to put a fence there to separate from the pavement and allow some privacy, keep the bins more tidy. The land is of no value to anybody else and is neglected currently - the council seems to have to stopped maintaining this area between the pavement and the houses on our street.
    • I suppose wind could have blown rubbish out of bins down into the pond. But I also counted three footballs and some smaller balls. Regrettably, there is also what seems to be a large dead carp or waterfowl, hard to tell at distance. I just hope the water quality is okay. I am not clear to what extent the pond is managed.
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...