Jump to content

Recommended Posts

shorts are fine when wearing jandals , but to wear 3/4 lenghts with shoes of any description is so so wrong.


I have some very sad looking fashionless victims in the pub garden today.


There is, on a good note , a group of young ladies from the language school up the road who have thought nothing of stripping to their bikini top / bra to get a bit of sun.


just about made me choke on my cucumber sandwiches!!!


Im gonna miss this pub garden.

Ahhh ok.

Tit Monday is what I think of as Beep-Beep-Wayhay-Day.


You know, the first warm spring day when males drivers (usually, but not exclusively, white van driver*) just can't resist tooting their horns and shouting at every woman they pass.


*by which I mean drivers of white vans not white drivers, obviously, before anyone starts anything.

Mmmmm, from top to toe indeed - I must say I go weak at the sight of men in sandals.

In fact I think I have in the past dated men precisely on that quality - neglecting to spot the overgrown facial hair at the time, so obsessed was I with their toes.


But then I have kissed many frogs - and little wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear? Open toad sandals of course!

Bellenden Belle Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> But then I have kissed many frogs - and little

> wonder since what type of shoes do frogs wear?

> Open toad sandals of course!


That's the male frogs BB, the stylish girl frogs won't be seen in anything but Ribbit-O Cavalli.

It's true, I read it in Frogue.

KalamityKel Wrote:

-------------------------------------------------------

> oh come on 3/4 lengths at least are much better

> than ankle swingers (for those who don't

> understand that concept - ill-fitting trousers

> that ride above the ankle displaying sock, skin,

> hair and shoe). That is just WRONG!


Accidental ankle swingers are no shame, they and their owner just can't help it.

They are blameless innocents such as geaography teachers or urchins and should be viewed with benign tolerance.

The wearer of 3/4 length trousers sets out with malice aforethought to offend and spread dismay.

He is the worst sort of poltroon and should be cut by the county.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Latest Discussions

    • He’s on the tree trunk outside the groundspeople’s yard - near the car park
    • I agree that I enjoy seeing the variety of wild flowers growing naturally in the streets and would much prefer that they were not destroyed. (The South London Botanical Institute actually conduct wildflower identification walks on street wild flowers.) However, as the council consider themselves to be responsible for removing these plants, it's better that they now dig them out rather than spraying them with toxic herbicide, as they used to do - a step in the right direction.
    • It's interesting how local businesses and the people that own / work in them are not considered part of the "community". The dictionary says "a group of people living in the same place" as the principal definition. Why are we forced to accept a secondary definition where those who don't live in social housing, the vast majority of people in East Dulwich, are told to shut up?
Home
Events
Sign In

Sign In



Or sign in with one of these services

Search
×
    Search In
×
×
  • Create New...